Posts Tagged ‘bankers’
EXPOSING THE FRAUD
In the last few days there have been a number of surprising media reports describing the extent of the banking fraud that has taken place. Surprising because they have appeared on the controlled corrupt mainstream television stations.
Over the last few months there has been a slow build up of coverage on Conservative supporting controlled corrupt media networks like Fox News where shills like Glen Beck feign support for the End the Fed movement and interview Ron Paul. He produces his blackboard charts to explain it while all the time maintaining a partizan line to make it a Democrat and Obama issue so as to maintain the false left right political party paradigm. Glen never delves deep enough to expose the real fraud.
However the latest twist is this (below), a segment from the Liberal supporting controlled corrupt media outlet MSNBC. This is the surprise in that this analysis does not make it party political. It flat out exposes the fraud for what it is, collusion between bankers, Wall Street, the Federal Reserve, and politicians to defraud and continue to defraud the people of the country and the world. No defence of the Democrats as would be expected. Now the question is why, and why now?
We have seen and heard over the last twelve months numerous calls for a global governance. These sentiments were echoed at the G20 summit last year by the obvious New World Order shills like Obama, Brown, Sarkozy and Merkel. However that would never be accepted by the people of the world and so it has been, and is, being implemented department by department. We all experienced the attempt to give the WHO control of the world’s health in the swine flu hoax. Now we are seeing the continuance of the push to give the World Bank control of all nations’ monetary policy
We have heard calls from all the usual suspects above for global financial governance and a global currency. Surprisingly also we have seen the Russian Prime minister and the Chinese echoing these ideas. To date these calls seem to have fallen on deaf ears, until now, when the seemingly deliberate zombifying of the banks, who are withholding any commercial lending, has deepened the economic crisis and stifled recovery from the recession to a point where even countries are going bankrupt. It is at this point that the Sarkozys and Browns in this fraud are calling for a global financial governance again. However more subtly this time by making the reasoniong that we need a global financial regulation because of the international nature of the banking misdeeds and errors.
A subtle way indeed of giving power to the World Bank to control the currency markets and banking systems of the world through “regulation” and to implement a worldwide tax on banking transaction. Brown this week spoke of the need for international regulation as the only way to stop this kind of banking fraud happening again. My estimate would be that they plan to implement this takeover by 2011. Firstly because it takes time to build up a media frenzy to support the idea, and secondly because there is still a lot of money to be screwed out of the people as the orchestrators of the fraud in the largest banks and darkest rooms of government have planned for many years at their co-ordinating meetings like Bilderberg
Jim Tucker, the editor of American Free Press and tireless follower of Bilderberg for 35 years, has this week revealed the date and venue for the next Bilderberg meeting and has also revealed through his sources inside the Bilderberg that the members want to prolong the recession for another year. Remember that Bilderberg is cross party and has a single agenda so whoever you think represents you really only represents them
This revelation correlates with the recent change in the way the media is reporting this fraud now. For the global financial governance by the International Bankers to become acceptable to the people, the media (which they also own) will have to convince the population that the existing banking system and the Federal Reserve (again which they also own) is the cause of this global meltdown. They will have to spend media time developing the populist clamour for action against the banks and the Fed. The need to drum up popular support for this new global regulation.
The mere fact that despite all the outrageous unconstitutional legislation passing through the Houses in Washington, the one seemingly anti-government Bill that remains alive and with massive cross party support is the Audit the Federal Reserve Bill from Ron Paul. True the Bill is stalled at the moment but we need to ask why is it stalled? Are they just waiting for the right moment to release it? Otherwise why does it still exist at all when no other anti-government Bill survives? It seems clear that the Bill after decades of trying has finally been let through thus far for the very reason we are reading here. As a tool to bring down the bankers’ own system so that they can re-emerge as a global banking system. Saviors of the world economy. Phoenix from the ashes, order out of chaos, these are their age old methods and mantras.
The indicators are pointing at another few months of media posturing and witch hunting along with further bailouts and tax rises. There will probably be a G20 announcement this year on June 27th in Canada of a new global regulatory system. We will have to wait and see what Jim Tucker and Daniel Estulin get out of the Bilderberg meeting in July before we find out what the plan for the dollar collapse leading to a new global reserve currency will be but it will probably coincide with around G20 2011. Look out for a numerologically significant date for this announcement as it is a cornerstone of the NWO. It might possibly be September 11th 2011 as this would be the 20th anniversary of Bush’s public proclamation of the NWO
In one respect we might count ourselves lucky because at the Bilderberg 2007, where they decided to pull the plug on the world economy, there was a discussion reported by an insider that two factions in the Bilderberg wanted different length depressions. One faction wanted this short one to two year crash, while the older group wished to see a thirty year depression that would cause global death and mayhem.
WHY THIS ISN’T SPECULATION
Some people reading might think this is all speculation. It can however be easily shown to be an old trick these same Banksters have successfully used before to pull off similar frauds.
Back in 1913 a small group of Bankers, through the Federal Reserve Act, took over the issuance of money and hence control of the US economy. How could the people of the US possibly support such a crazy idea? Simple. They were persuaded that it was the complete opposite of what those same bankers wanted. How? Even simpler. Two methods were used, the same two methods that are being used today.
The bankers headed by the Warburgs, (who was an agent for Rothschild) along with the main banking houses of the day including names like Rockefeller, JP Morgan etc drew up the Act in a secret meeting on Jeckyl Island. The plan was to get it implemented by the man they would finance into the Presidency in the 1912 election, one Woodrow Wilson. His agreement to enact the Bill was part of the deal. A deal about which he later wrote of his regret that he had handed over control of the country to the banks. Wilson as we know was elected and the Act was passed. But how?
Well prior to this JP Morgan had sent his minions to find out how many of the country’s top newspapers and magazines it would take to control public opinion. He discovered that it would only take 25 of the most popular titles. So JP Morgan bought up these titles and installed an editor in each who would follow specific content policies. This was not only the conduit for the election of Wilson, but it was used to gain support for the Federal Reserve Act. Morgan published article after article in his newly acquired press telling the readers how the bankers were outright against the imposition of the Federal Reserve Act as regulation on their activities after the stock market crash they had orchestrated in 1907 and the Standard Oil scandal of the Rockefellers before that. This was a lie of course as the bankers would own the Fed and wrote the Act in the first place but the public bought it and called on their congressmen to implement the Act which they unwittingly did
So you see filling the bank owned news media with fabricated stories of the banks opposition to new regulation was a smokescreen then and it is a smokescreen now. The media will now persuade the public to call for the system to be dismantled and a world regulatory system put in it’s place. They may even ask for a cashless system with total control of your account transactions if the bankers wish to oppose that too in their media. Both of which of course the bankers want more than anything as they also own and run the World Bank and hence own us.
As much as the bankers owned the press in Morgan’s lifetime, they own the media now. All the main TV, radio and printed news is owned by banking holding companies. Most news outlets no longer even have their own on the ground reporters and rely on news from Reuters and Associated Press from around the world. Both of these “independent” news agencies are however owned by Rothschild Banking house. It is then quite easy to see why the news is reported so obviously skewed these days in many issues from terrorism and war to the economy and Israel.
TIMING THE CHANGE
As above the timing of the banking switch is not yet set in stone. A lot of balls must line up. There is still a lot of money to be made before the economy and the dollar are finally destroyed. Currently many countries around the world are still in the process of bailing out big banking investors with people’s future taxes. There is also the metal markets derivative bubble that is still inflating. There is also the derivatives bubble being inflated now using packaged up pensions policies sold on ad infinitum. If the world economy is going to go through a system change then these bankers will milk it for all it’s worth, in fact for more than it’s worth before they burst all of those bubbles together and bring the whole thing crashing to it’s knees. By the time this happens though they will have bought up everything of value like land, minerals, water, roads, ports, etc etc using your future bail out money and derivative money that never actually existed.
What then? Well in a state of world bankruptcy and all assets in the hands of the few there is but one scenario. Feudal slavery. Much like now under the chapter 11 bankrupt countries we operate in now, but with less choice or even perceived idea that we are free. A world welfare state of a million rules for a few benefits. Roll on the revolution I say.
July 19, 2009
The public humiliation of Mark Sanford following his fight against the U.S. Treasury Dept. and the Federal Reserve banks that control it is part of a clear and disturbing pattern:
Governors who speak out against member banks of the New York Federal Reserve and other major Wall Street institutions tend to be publicly humiliated and taken down through the discretionary leaking of compromising information.
Consider the case of former Gov. Eliot Spitzer of New York. Prior to serving as governor, he had been New York Attorney General, a role in which he made a name for himself by taking on organized crime and securities fraud. Among those he charged in lawsuits was Richard Grasso, former chairman of the New York Stock Exchange. Spitzer also campaigned against stock price inflation by investment houses, predatory practices by mortgage lenders, and mutual fund fraud. He continued to pursue his campaign against corrupt banking practices as governor.
In March 2008, the NewYork Times reported that Spitzer was a client of a prostitution ring then under investigation by the Federal government. Spitzer resigned two days later. Who leaked the information? The New York Times wasn’t saying. Could it have been retaliation for Spitzer’s campaign against Wall Street corruption?
Or consider the case of Rod Blagojevich, former governor of Illinois. He was nabbed by the Feds in December 2008 on a comprehensive catalog of charges, including wire fraud and solicitation of bribery. Many observers thought Blagojevich was simply carrying out business as usual and had simply had the misfortune of being caught.
The public was treated to the entertaining spectacle of politicians across the ideological spectrum—including” Blagojevich’s former allies and supporters—stumbling over one another to express their indignation and moral rectitude. Of course, none of them would do things like solicit bribes and accept kickbacks.
The day prior to his arrest, Blagojevich had declared that the State of Illinois would stop doing business with Bank of America, a member bank of the Federal Reserve. His action came in response to Bank of America’s cutting off a line of credit to a Chicago factory—an incident that had gained wide press coverage in the Chicago area and become a cause célèbre that Blagojevich would have been foolish to ignore.
Early on the morning of Dec. 8, 2008, the day following his declaration that Illinois would no longer deal with Bank of America, Blagojevich was taken away from his home in handcuffs by Federal agents. Interestingly, on the same morning but before the arrest had hit the news wires, Bloomberg.com quoted John Douglas, attorney for Bank of America and former general counsel for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., as describing Blagojevich’s declaration against Bank of America as “dangerous.”
Dangerous for whom? For the banking industry, or for those who dare to resist it? Perhaps for both?
One former governor who has talked openly about the extortion game played against governors by the Federal government and the banks that own it is Jess Ventura, who served as Governor of Minnesota from 1999 to 2003. He ran for and won the governorship as an independent with Libertarian leanings, which placed him outside the political establishment.
Shortly after becoming governor, Ventura says he was summoned to a meeting with numerous people who turned out to be agents of the Central Intelligence Agency. In a television interview, Ventura said:
“I wouldn’t have known a CIA guy if he would’ve came up and bit me. I went to my old friends, my old teammates to try to get advice to pick up why they were questioning me and he was exactly right. He said, ‘They didn’t see you coming.’ They wanted to know if there were more independent governors on the horizon.”
Ventura correctly pointed out to the agents—if indeed that is what they were—that their domestic operation was illegal. He has since concluded that the agents were there to let him know who’s really in charge at the state level, and that it isn’t the state governors and legislatures.
A holder of public office needn’t be a governor to feel the nip of the wringer after criticizing member banks of the Federal Reserve. Just ask Sen. Richard Durbin of Illinois.
Never one to conceal what he really thinks, Sen. Durbin appeared on a Chicago radio talk show near the end of April 2009 and said, “And the banks—hard to believe in a time when we’re facing a banking crisis that many of the banks created—are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place.”
A month and a half later, Durbin was blindsided by accusations that he had sold more than $115,000 worth of stock after being tipped off to the severity of the financial crisis during a closed meeting with Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke in Sept. 2008.
The Chicago Sun-Times, which broke the “story,” reported that Durbin had bought about $43,000 worth of Berkshire Hathaway stock the same day he had liquidated his mutual funds and eventually invested a total of about $98,000 with the Oracle of Omaha’s fund.
A Durbin spokesman correctly pointed out that “Durbin was doing what a lot of other people were doing, taking a look at their savings” and seeing it “start to tank and trying to preserve some level of wealth by getting out of the market.”
This non-scandal has since gone nowhere, and in fact the original story has disappeared from the Sun-Times’ archives. But perhaps Durbin has gotten the message: If you’re a high-profile holder of public office, you don’t question or resist the banks.
As corrupt or immoral as many of them may be, governors and members of Congress probably deserve more pity than scorn. After all, most private citizens are subjected merely to passive surveillance—our telephone conversations and e-mails are filtered through facilities run by the National Security Agency in partnership with AT&T and other telecommunications companies that search out “hot” keywords. Our communications aren’t examined by a human being unless they’re flagged as containing something “suspicious.”
Governors and members of Congress, on the other hand, are far more likely to be placed under active surveillance—their communications are routinely eavesdropped upon by security personal working for the advancement of the takeover of the Federal government by Federal Reserve and its member banks, both domestic and foreign.
So before becoming too outraged at the next story about a corrupt governor or member of Congress, remember that we’re all living under the same tyranny. High-profile politicians are simply more likely to be humiliated when successfully nailed for refusing to go along with the program. In any story involving the humiliation of one of them, always look for the banking connection. You’ll usually find one.