Archive for December, 2008

So why do you think they keep hyping up this jab?

December 30, 2008

This question I will answer in the next blog but first some main stream coverage of the bad science behind it

Flu Jab that costs £115m a year does not cut death rate in elderly

30th August 2008
Having a flu jab does not cut the death rate among the elderly, claim researchers.
They say vaccination has a virtually non-existent effect on the risk of dying prematurely and that previous studies have ‘ exaggerated’ the apparent benefits.
A study of 700 pensioners suffering pneumonia, a complication of flu, suggested those who had taken the jab were indeed less likely to die than those who were unvaccinated.
But closer analysis showed those who were vaccinated were healthier and more likely to look after themselves in the first place – which means they were less at risk of dying from flu-related complications.
The study looked at data on 700 Canadians aged 65 and over. Half had taken the vaccine and half had not, but they were all admitted to hospital for pneumonia.
Researchers from the University of Alberta found 12 per cent of patients died after a hospital stay of eight days on average.
Those who had been vaccinated were half as likely to die as unvaccinatedpatients – a finding consistent-with the benefits shown in previous studies.
However, researchers then examined the patients’ clinical records, and factors including age, sex, smoking, frailty and socioeconomic status.
After these were taken into account, the relative risk of death was reduced by a ‘statistically nonsignificant’ amount, says the study published yesterday in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine.
Dr Dean Eurich, of the university’s school of public health, said it was ‘implausible’ that vaccination was halving the mortality rate among flu victims.
Researchers suggested previous studies had not considered sufficiently that vaccinated patients who survived were probably healthier and better able to combat flulike complications than unvaccinated ones who died.
But it is difficult to prove the so-called ‘healthy-user’ effect, they said. Dr Sumit Majumdar, associate professor in the university’s faculty of medicine and dentistry, said: ‘It is seen in what doctors often refer to as their “good patients”.’ They are well-informed about their health and look after themselves, ‘and quite religiously get vaccinated each year so as to stay healthy’.
He advised those with respiratory or immune diseases to still get vaccinated, along with those taking care of the elderly.
A Department of Health spokesman said: ‘Studies show flu vaccines give about 70 to 80 per cent protection against flu infection. That is why it is recommended to those aged over 65 and those in an at-risk group.’
Dr Majumdar advised people with respiratory or immune diseases to still get vaccinated, along with those taking care of elderly people.
‘But you also need to take care of yourself’ he added ‘because flu vaccine is not as effective as people have been thinking it is.’
The researchers claim that ‘clearly inflated and erroneous’ findings of the benefits of flu jabs from previous studies have done patients a disservice by stifling efforts at finding better vaccines, especially for the elderly.
In November, the jab’s co-inventor Australian biochemist Dr Graeme Laver told the Daily Mail the jab did not guarantee protection.
He said ‘I have never been very impressed with its efficacy.
‘It is better than nothing and I wouldn’t want to advise people not to take it, but you can’t rely on it doing any good.’
A UK Health Protection Agency study also suggested that flu jabs did not reduce hospital admissions from respiratory infections.
Plans to extend the flu jab programme to adults aged 50 to 65 and children under the age of two were given the thumbs down by three-quarters of GPs polled earlier this year.
However, a Department of Health spokesman said: ‘Studies show that flu vaccines give about 70 to 80 per cent protection against flu infection.
‘That is why it is recommended to those aged over 65 and those in an at risk group.
‘In the elderly, protection against infection may be less, but there is good evidence showing that immunisation reduces the incidence of bronchopneumonia, hospital admissions and mortality. Many countries support flu vaccination programmes. Uptake in older people in the UK is relatively high, being close to the 75 per cent target of the World Health Organization.’
So it seems the World Health Organisation is behind the push. Now that doesn’t surprise me as it is a partner of the UN (otherwise known as our soon to be world government).
This will actaully get quite sinister in part 2 of this blog and I direct you towards reading a document published by the UN called Biodiversity Assessment 1996. I am having trouble finding it anymore as it seems to have been removed from the record for good reason. If anyone can find this please advise me.
In this document you will find reference to population reduction
of humans. This will be the start point of a shocking new blog to come

You should be doing this background reading yourselves

December 29, 2008

Here’s something I found quickly regards the spraying because somebody thinks I’m nuts and it isn’t true

Well here is your government documents to prove it is true



§1520 & 1524

Chemical and Biological Warfare

§ 1520. Use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents by Department of Defense; accounting to to congressional committees with respect to experiments and studies; notification of local civilian officials

(a) Not later than thirty days after final approval within the Department of Defense of plans for any experiment or study to be conducted by the Department of Defense, whether directly or under contract, involving the use of human subjects for the testing of chemical or biological agents, the Secretary of Defense shall supply the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and House of Representatives with a full accounting of such plans for such experiment or study, and such experiment or study may then be conducted only after the expiration of the thirty-day period beginning on the date such accounting is received by such committees.

(b)(1) The Secretary of Defense may not conduct any test or experiment involving the use of any chemical or biological agent on civilian populations unless local civilian officials in the area in which the test or experiment is to be conducted are notified in advance of such test or experiment, and such test or experiment may then be conducted only after the expiration of the thirty-day period beginning on the date of such notification.

(2) Paragraph (1) shall apply to tests and experiments conducted by Department of Defense personnel and tests and experiments conducted on behalf of the Department of Defense by contractors.

§1524. Agreements to provide support to vaccination programs of Department of Health and Human Services.

(a) Agreements authorized. The Secretary of Defense may enter into agreements with the Secretary of Health and Human Services to provide support for vaccination programs of the Secretary of Health and Human Services in the United States through use of the excess peacetime biological weapons defense capability of the Department of Defense.

Changes made to title 50 in April, 2000

§1520a. Restrictions on the use of human subjects for testing of chemical or biological agents.

(a) Prohibited activities

The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contract)—

(1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population/ or

(2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects.

(b) Exceptions

Subject to subsections (c),(d), and (e) of this section, the prohibition in subsection (a)

of this section does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes.

(1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity.

(2) Any purpose that is directly related protection against toxic chemicals or biological weapons and agents.

(3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control.


Full text is here on government website

and the government website if you want to find out more


There you see even the 2000 changes have exceptions that make everything still legal.

Also with this code in place you can guarantee the practice went on after it was challenged in the 1970s

Take me seriously now?

Time to come out of denial because only you can stop this

December 27, 2008

Take a look up at your sky and ask yourself “Is this how I remember it?”

Do you think there is something not quite right with those clouds. Something nagging at your mind about the way the sky looks and behaves and changes these days?


The corporate media keep banging on at us that we are changing the climate and that it is all our fault and we are the enemy of earth’s ecosystem. Perhaps we are, but not in the way the media want your to think

For years now they have told us WE caused global warming even though every other planet and moon in the solar system went through the same temperature changes. When that hoax became unsustainable because the sun began to cool as it naturally does in it’s cycle, they renamed the phenomenum “climate change” but somehow even though the planet has started cooling it is still our greenhouse gasses that are doing it. Does that really make any sense?

Well the media tells us we have had a huge increase in freak weather to back up this claim. In fact statistics show that there is no increase in the number of hurricanes or typhoons or earthquakes to any previously measured years, they just tell us there is

There has been some very unseasonably mild winters and wet summers in the last 5 years, but no heatwaves and no severe cold as we used to have when I was growing up. I remember summers where the asphalt in the playground melted, and winters where it was bitter and the ice had to be broken off the pond every day. Now I need a jacket and a brolly all year round just in case, but the gloves and hat are gathering dust., and I cant remember what sunscreen smells like

Well this may be explained simply by looking up

Please watch the short video linked below and I will explain why afyerwards

I chose this video because it shows the comparisons in the same shot and mentions all the current thinking on the issue.

Here is the best evidence put together in one short presentation for you I could find


I think the chemtrail evidence is pretty clear in that video, but what are they for?

I made note to check the sky today and saw a jet coming out of the airport with a normal contrail that never got longer than half a mile and faded as the plane flew within 15 seconds. However I have more often these days seen the trails linger all morning. What are they doing to us? Well whoever is doing it gave us an early Christmas present this year by chemtrailing over the shopping area on Christmas Eve where I was buying toys.. I made a note there and then to carry my camera at all times from now so I can send the evidence to the newspapers and my local representatives. You should too.

So what are they?

Well, when challenged on the issue the government in the US say they have been spraying for the last 10 years simply for “weather manipulation. This is however a worldwide phenomena, so does that mean ALL countries have been manipulating the weather? Well it certainly would explain a few things about how “global warming” suddenly became “climate change”. If nature isn’t playing ball with your “warming tax” agenda and you need to change your story to “climate tax” then that would explain much of this spraying. It certainly coincided with some of the summer flash floods we had here this year that had our weathermen stumped

The spraying (and HAARP) excercise does have the power to exascerbate any type of weather effect from drought to flash flood, or from snow storm to hurricane simply by affecting the heat absorbtion rate from the sun and hence the air pressure and movement. You may theorise that it is then possible to manipulate the strength and direction of a hurricane say for instance Catriona, if you wanted to desensitise the public to expect disasters such as New Orleans in the future and to back up the extreme weather theory

If you still actually believe the global warming lies note a few things and then watch this quick debunking of the theory

Carbon is not the enemy it is the basis of life on the planet

Carbon dioxide it the life giving gas to plantlife

CO2 is only 0.05% of our atmosphere and our input to that is microscopic compared to say plancton.

95% 0f all greenhouse gas is simple water vapour

The planet has cooled as much in the last 12 months as it warmed in the last 100 years

The leaders are calling for world government run by the bankers who screwed us in the first place, and for us to buy carbon credits from and pay carbon tax to those same bankers. What exactly will a tax do to stop a cow farting can anyone tell me? Absolutely nothing but it will make us poorer and our rulers more powerful. What is all this money to be used for?

I could go on but let the outright lie told by the globalist shill Al Gore be exposed here

oh and a few more of his lies here

I think there are enough circumstantials there to point at deliberate adverse weather modification don’t you?

However let’s examine further

What concerns me most is what is in these chemtrails. This short news real shows the test results. Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium, Chromium, Lead, Selerium and Silver particles all found in these chemtrails, all these heavy metals. The very things that cause chronic ilnesses and negatively affect the brain functions. What on earth are these things doing falling from our skies onto us?

Well remember the recent articles in mainstream press showing Britsh kids are now 2 years less intelligent than the kids of the 1970s and the US has slipped from top of the education league to outside the top 30 in the world in the same time. Could it be true what many say that this is all by design? The deliberate “dumbing down” of the population by any means.?

Well it certainly fits the pattern when you consider other sources of chemicals affecting us that lessen our brain and health functions. For example

Fluoride (which is infact pure rat poison) in water that increases the brain absorbtion of aluminium, known to be a cause of altzhiemers and linked to autismm, bone cancer, kidney damage and fluorosis of teeth

Aspartame in 6000 foodstuffs as a sweetener when it is proven to cause tumors, liver damage, heart disease, and because when heated it breaks down into formaldihide (embalming fluid) and methanol which are highly poisonous, it causes brain damage and blindness

Codex Alimentarius, the UN group are trying to ban all natural health suppliments including herbs, unless prescribed by a doctor

Our vaccines, let
alone containing other live viruses (supposedly inactivated), when injected in multiple shots, are held in a mercury solution as a presevative. You don’t need me to tell you what mercury does to the human body.

On top of this we also now have genetically modified food that is causing sterility, asthma, excema, to name a couple of many

Yes it all fits together if you can believe that an elite group would set about controlling or even reducing the world population by these means as well of course using wars to order, famine, or the release of pathogens. Yes it does all fit. It all fits with their own published or leaked documents too. You need only google search “UN or Club of Rome or CIA, or Iron Mountain, and many more regards population reduction and it is there for you to read.

“AH NO ! That’s impossible, they would never do that !”

Well that’s not really true is it. If you look you will find a wealth of declassified documents in the UK and the US detailing the fact that they have been spraying entire areas of the population in the 1950s, 60s and 70s (at least), with everything from nerve agents and bacterial agents to radioactive material. We have been human guinea pigs

There is a case in Norfolk now based on this declassified information about the causing of leukemia in the Norwich area by the MoD using this spraying testing in the 1970s.. I won’t even go into what they did to children in orphanages here but I urge you to read it yourself.

Here is an updated concern group opinion on the fact that the US looks like officially returning to the practice. It should be noted though that this probably means it never stopped in the 1980s and 1990s when you consider that this week the US government quietly slipped through a law enabling them to take DNA from every child born and “back dated it 35 years” because they were doing it anyway.

This is a double edged sword. An excercise in completing the greatest con the world ever saw by taxing our very breath; while at the same time poisoning us so that we are too dumb, too lethargic, too ill, and too busy to do anything about it.

Even if you could organise, could you have a voice when the media will no let dissent be heard? You have the internet only for now but that is being attacked and sold off to the media companies as we speak by the same leaders who want to sell us to the bankers.

How dare they spray you and your children with heavy metals, radiation, germs, and nerve gas !

How dare they poison our water and food and modify it’s genes and sterilize us!

How dare they inject mercury into our kids and tell us it’s ok !

People you need to go and research this now and WAKE UP before you become a slave to their system. They are moving on their world governance. What are you going to do about it slave?

NWO Assassinate US top WW2 General

December 22, 2008

General George S. Patton was assassinated to silence his criticism of allied war leaders claims new book

George S. Patton, America’s greatest combat general of the Second World War, was assassinated after the conflict with the connivance of US leaders, according to a new book.

By Tim Shipman i

n Washington
Last Updated: 5:09PM GMT 21 Dec 2008

General George S. Patton was assassinated to silence his criticism of allied war leaders claims new book

Sunday, Dec 21, 2008

George S. Patton, America’s greatest combat general of the Second World War, was assassinated after the conflict with the connivance of US leaders, according to a new book.

The newly unearthed diaries of a colourful assassin for the wartime Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the forerunner of the CIA, reveal that American spy chiefs wanted Patton dead because he was threatening to expose allied collusion with the Russians that cost American lives.

The death of General Patton in December 1945, is one of the enduring mysteries of the war era. Although he had suffered serious injuries in a car crash in Manheim, he was thought to be recovering and was on the verge of flying home.

But after a decade-long investigation, military historian Robert Wilcox claims that OSS head General “Wild Bill” Donovan ordered a highly decorated marksman called Douglas Bazata to silence Patton, who gloried in the nickname “Old Blood and Guts”.

His book, “Target Patton”, contains interviews with Mr Bazata, who died in 1999, and extracts from his diaries, detailing how he staged the car crash by getting a troop truck to plough into Patton’s Cadillac and then shot the general with a low-velocity projectile, which broke his neck while his fellow passengers escaped without a scratch.

Mr Bazata also suggested that when Patton began to recover from his injuries, US officials turned a blind eye as agents of the NKVD, the forerunner of the KGB, poisoned the general.

Mr Wilcox told The Sunday Telegraph that when he spoke to Mr Bazata: “He was struggling with himself, all these killings he had done. He confessed to me that he had caused the accident, that he was ordered to do so by Wild Bill Donovan.

“Donovan told him: ‘We’ve got a terrible situation with this great patriot, he’s out of control and we must save him from himself and from ruining everything the allies have done.’ I believe Douglas Bazata. He’s a sterling guy.”

This is the original full Daily Telegraph article

New leaders just more puppets of NWO

December 22, 2008

Obama and Biden to Protect Bush Administration Criminals

It’s par for the course for Obama and Biden, the men who promised “change” but in every step of their preparations for assuming office have pursued nothing but continuity, to acknowledge that they will protect criminals in the Bush administration from prosecution for authorizing torture, a complete violation of both the U.S. constitution and the Geneva Conventions.

When asked by ABC host George Stephanopoulos if top level Bush administration officials would be prosecuted for mandating prisoner abuse, Biden said that he and Obama would be “focusing on the future,” adding “I think we should be looking forward, not backwards.”

Such rhetoric goes to the very heart of the gigantic con job the “Obama change” hoax has wrought upon millions of befuddled Americans who naively presumed that voting for the lesser of two evils would result in anything other than more evil

Perhaps Göring, Ribbentrop and the rest of the Nazis prosecuted at Nuremberg for their war crimes were following the wrong line of defense when they claimed they were merely “following orders,” they should have just proclaimed that the world should be “looking forward not backwards” and according to the Biden/Obama view of justice, they would have got off scot free.

Likewise, pedophiles and rapists who abuse children and women in ways not far removed from what was approved at Abu Ghraib should merely tell police that since the abuse and rape occurred in the past, everybody should just move on, “looking forwards not backwards”.

Obama and Biden, with their de-facto pardons of the Bush administration torture masters, are ensuring that what happened at places like Abu Ghraib, including beating people to death, raping people with acid covered batons and sexual abuse of children, will continue to happen in future without consequence.

Of course, those that protect war criminals from prosecution should be treated no better than the war criminals themselves, and when real “change” comes to America, Obama and Biden will face the same justice as Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld

Are the Jews the New World Order ?

December 19, 2008

This might interest you

If you care to do some research you will find a million articles and films proving 911 was an inside job BUT who did it? Just take my word for it if you want to read on because you must aproach this from that perspective to properly appreciate this blog

This is a film I saw tonight that I thought made a very good case for itself regarding who the culprits are. My take has always been that it is the New World Order but who they are in reality could be “Illuminated” here

Before you watch the film a quick recap of history might help here to put this in context because the filmaker is suggesting that the criminal network that carried out this false flag attack is a Jewish run criminal network

OK history, let’s go backwards

We all should be aware of the illegal occupation of Palestine and the illegal settlements, the illegal wall built around Gaza and the sea blockade of the west bank, and their disregarding of UN resolutions to cease these activities. Well of course not in the mainstream press but look at the independant press

The film deals with the USS Liberty and the Suez canal, so we will start at World War 2 where the Jews were a minority in Germany yet controlled all the banks and all the media and much of the industry. While at the same time declared war on Germany in the 1930s and boycotted German produce worldwide. This may explain some of the distrust of Jews in Germany

This is not the only reason though because half way through World War 1 the Germans had the British blockaded and a week away from surrender but were offering a ceasefire, when the Jewish lobby in Germany did a deal to bring America into the war if Britain would give them Palestine. Hence the double crossing of the country that gave them a home and let them prosper when nowhere else would welcome them

The Russian revolution was headed up by Jews who controlled the economy and the forerunner to the KGB who were resposible for the anihilation of millions

We could go back further but we might end up at the Exodus from Egypt where the Jews were run out of Egypt for reasons not discussed. Some theorise that the Arc of the Covenant actually resided in the Kings chamber in the great pyramid and was the source of it’s power. This would explain the Pharoah’s biblical chase and also the fact that Solomon’s Temple where it was housed later was the exact same dimensions as the chamber in the pyramid

Anyway that was just a theory

Also before you watch take note that the international bankers who are purported to be the leaders of the New World Order aka Rothschilds, Rockerfellers and Warburgs are also Jewish hailing from the original German Jewish 18th century cabal that started this agenda to control the world’s wealth, economies and hence the world itself.

Also note that today almost all the world’s media is controlled or owned by Jewish people.

The AIPAC jewish lobby group supply around 50% of election funding for both Republican and Democrat Parties

OK this film simply puts together some of the facts surrounding the attack, that the 911 inquiry decided were not important enough to include in the investigation, and puts them all together .

See if you think it should have been included in the investigation

A couple of things the filmaker missed that are interesting.

The Mossad agents arrested in NY on 911 when interviewed in Israel said ” we were only there to record the event”. This confirms they knew beforehand that it was going to happen in order for them to be set up with cameras ahead of time in NY

There were a group of a dozen to twenty “Israeli Art Students” staying in the Twin Towers rent free for a month or 2 before the attack. Some workers in the buildings reported that there were many empty floors in the towers from which construction sounds were heard for weeks before the attack


I would like to know your opinion on this speculation especially in the light that it shows that the Jews hold an enormously disproportionate number of top government and judiciary jobs in America compared to their tiny population there.

Added to the joint nationality issue isn’t this a crazy situation to have allowed to happen?

Protest against Google/Youtube internet censorship

December 17, 2008

NuffRespect is an award winning Youtube video filmmaker who, amongst many others, has been subjected to mass cesorship by Google. This is a call to arms to protect the freedom of the internet for the people who made Youtube what it is today, namely US.

Now has anyone else noticed that all the changes made by Google since they bought Youtube have finally accumulated into a completely ineffective system?
Youtube is pretty useless now unless you are a corporate tool or a sheeple (which i am not)
so I will be participating in a boycott organised by Nuffrespect beginning on the 19th of December 2008… and I encourage you to do the same!
During this time I will only use other search engines like Yahoo and other video hosting sites like Metacafe

It seems as though Youtube no longer wants us to be able to spread videos around and make them popular by our choice. They want to choose which videos (and channels) will become popular and censor those that they wish would go away!

They removed our bulletins that appeared on all our friend’s pages…
They modified the video “share” feature to make it even HARDER to reach even LESS people…
And if anyone hasn’t read the terms of usage agreement lately, you might want to do that…
It basically says that even if “we the people” of Youtube decide that a video is most viewed, discussed, rated, etc. they will remove these honors if they don’t approve of the content… and we’re talkin’ about videos that have already met the criteria of acceptable for posting!
So basically if Youtube doesn’t agree with your opinion, they reserve the right to stifle it and censor you!
Is this the Youtube you’ve come to know and love??? i didn’t think so

“Here are just a few of the main censorship methods used by YouTube:

* Fiddling the View Counters by not displaying the true number of views on videos. This keeps the videos out of the most-viewed lists to stop them from going viral.
* Removing honors from videos to prevent the video being displayed in any of the lists.
* Removing pages of comments from the video to prevent it from reaching the most-discussed lists.
* Removing the video for no reason, and displaying the message “This video has been removed by the user” on the page where the video used to be.
* Preventing the video from playing properly, if at all (sometimes accompanied by the message: “This video is no longer available”).
* Failing to display a thumbnail image for your video.
* Displaying completely irrelevant videos in the “Related Videos” section on the video page.

“Unless we protest about these crude methods of censorship, the problem of censorship will not go away.”

“Youtube is doing is an assault on the most basic principle of the internet, the unrestricted free flow of information from computer to computer, from user to user, to hell with Youtube’s tv network like tactics”

Youtube is pushing garbage at you in it’s front pages. The same garbage that the TV spews out 24/7. Pop culture, sports, girls in bikinis, models and boy bands, and crass TV shows. Dumbing down the masses who escaped the TV networks to find the internet

ALL methods of communication on Youtube have been completely retarded to prevent ceertain information or users spreading their information regardless of Youtube’s fiddling the figures
Loads of people have reported that vids from particular contacts aren’t showing up in their subscription area…
We can’t bulletin them to all friends anymore… nor can we share them anymore (accept one at a time on the subscription list which takes too long)

So, if you wanna know what particular contacts have goin’ on, now ya gotta visit each channel… that is, until they find a way to screw with that too!

Outside of Youtube Goofle is also removing links in their search engine to articles they do not approve of. For instance, a news article on a web based news site could not be found any longer in Google search engine even if the entire title of the article was written in full in search, yet the article is still on the site.

This is happening to thousands and thousands of alternative news sites and they are only selecting stories and sites that question the “official version” of the world news

The removal of videos is supposed to be based on profanity or sexual content. However most of the notable issues that are being removed by Youtube or blanked out by Google include, 9/11 truth, Genetically Modified foods, fake terrorism, chemicals in food and water, vaccinations and research into the dangers, what is really going on in Iraq including the death toll and the actions of the soldiers, changes to the internet, government cover up revelations and official criminality, reports outlining the New world order strategy, health issues, militarisation, police misconduct, Israel, amd many many more. All serious issues covered by concerned people yet these moviemakers are being deleted from Youtube and their websites are being filtered by Google

Now ask yourself WHY would they do that?

Why commence revisionism just like the re-writing of history in George Orwell’s 1984. The ONLY reason for doing this is the sinister act of hiding the truth from the public so that the criminals running this world can get away with anything they damn well please

On top of this entire websites are being filtered out in government owned buildings including libraries, stations, schools, government departments, even trains

This is a direct attack on your freedom to read and see what you choose, and it is getting worse. Soon the internet is to be broken up into a few providers who are going to be filtering the entire net before you get to it. Australia starts in March 09 and Canada soon too. Brown wants it in the UK and Obama wants it in the US.

The time to act is now in the only way we can. Google earns advertising revenue based on the number of clicks, SO WE STOP CLICKING and we hurt them in their pocket where it matters to them


PS. please look on Youtube before the 19th to see videos to find out more about the December 19th boycott!

Financial Times Editorial Admits Agenda For Dictatorial World Government

December 11, 2008

Jaw-dropping report concedes that “global governance” is a euphemism for anti-democratic global government

Paul Joseph Watson
Tuesday, December 9, 2008

The Financial Times, one of the most respected and widely read newspapers on the planet, features an editorial today that openly admits the agenda to create a world government based on anti-democratic principles and concedes that the term “global governance” is merely a euphemism for the move towards a centralized global government.

For years we were called paranoid nutcases for warning about the elite’s plans to centralize global power and destroy American sovereignty. Throughout the 1990’s people who talked about the alarming move towards global government were smeared as right-wing lunatics by popular culture and the media.

Now the agenda is out in the open and in our faces, the debunkers have no more ammunition with which to deride us.

A jaw-dropping editorial written by the Financial Times’ chief foreign affairs commentator Gideon Rachman entitled ‘And now for a world government’ lays out the plan for global government and how it is being pushed with deceptive language and euphemisms in order to prevent people from becoming alarmed

“For the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible,” writes Rachman, citing the financial crisis, “global warming” and the “global war on terror” as three major pretexts through which it is being introduced.

Rachman writes that “global governance” could be introduced much sooner than many expect and that President elect Barack Obama has already expressed his desire to achieve that goal, making reference to Obama’s circle of advisors which includes Strobe Talbott, who in 1992 stated, “In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.”

Rachman then concedes that the more abstract term “global governance,” which is often used by top globalists like David Rockefeller as a veil to offset accusations that a centralized global government is the real agenda, is merely a trick of “soothing language” that is used to prevent “people reaching for their rifles in America’s talk-radio heartland”.

“But some European thinkers think that they recognise what is going on,” says Rachman. “Jacques Attali, an adviser to President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, argues that: “Global governance is just a euphemism for global government.” As far as he is concerned, some form of global government cannot come too soon. Mr Attali believes that the “core of the international financial crisis is that we have global financial markets and no global rule of law”.

Rachman proceeds to outline what the first steps to an official world government would look like, including the creation of “A legally binding climate-change agreement negotiated under the auspices of the UN and the creation of a 50,000-strong UN peacekeeping force”.

“A “world government” would involve much more than co-operation between nations,” writes Rachman. “It would be an entity with state-like characteristics, backed by a body of laws. The European Union has already set up a continental government for 27 countries, which could be a model. The EU has a supreme court, a currency, thousands of pages of law, a large civil service and the ability to deploy military force.”

“So, it seems, everything is in place. For the first time since homo sapiens began to doodle on cave walls, there is an argument, an opportunity and a means to make serious steps towards a world government,” concludes Rachman, before acknowledging that the path to global government will be “slow and painful”.

Tellingly, Rachman concedes that “International governance tends to be effective, only when it is anti-democratic,” citing the continual rejection of EU expansion when the question is put to a vote. “In general, the Union has progressed fastest when far-reaching deals have been agreed by technocrats and politicians – and then pushed through without direct reference to the voters,” writes Rachman.

So there you have it – one of the world’s top newspapers, editorially led by chief economics commentator Martin Wolf, a top Bilderberg luminary, openly proclaiming that not only is world government the agenda, but that world government will only be achieved through dictatorial measures because the majority of the people are dead against it.

Will we still be called paranoid conspiracy theorists for warning that a system of dictatorial world government is being set up, even as one of the world’s most influential newspapers admits to the fact? Or will people finally wake up and accept that there is a globalist agenda to destroy sovereignty, any form of real democracy, and freedom itself in the pursuit of an all-powerful, self-interested, centralized, unrepresentative and dictatorial world government?

Rachman’s article is all about the merits and necessity of global government and then at the end he brazenly adds the caveat that it will only be a success if it is anti-democratic in nature, ie dictatorial.

Rachman has since tried to backtrack on the article after it was referenced all over the world across the internet

Rachman’s attempt to backtrack and protest his innocence in claiming the article was anything but a PR piece for global government may fool the naive, but when we have dozens and dozens of highly influential figures throughout the decades calling for the same thing, the seriousness of the issue becomes clear.

Global government is by no means a new phenomenon proposed as a “solution” to current problems, it is the ultimate goal for a long-standing agenda that seeks to crush national sovereignty and freedom and replace it with a tyrannical new world order. That is not some kind of hare-brained conspiracy theory as Rachman would have it, it is a privately and publicly stated mission of the global elite.

Strobe Talbot, current Obama advisor and President Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State, wasn’t loosely “debating” the subject of one world government when in 1992 he told Time Magazine, “In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.”

Neither was Dr. Henry Kissinger absently chit-chatting when he told a Bilderberg conference in 1991, “Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat fro
m beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”

Likewise, international financier James Warburg was deadly serious when he told a Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1950, “We shall have a world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.”

The march towards a centralized global government is not a contemporary idea, it is a coordinated movement firmly entrenched in history.

At the end of his riposte, Rachman cracks a lame joke about pretending to be a member of the “Bilderberg/Illuminati/Council on Foreign Relations/UN/Zionist establishment” to make millions from tell-all books.

Deliciously ironic it is therefore that as a matter of routine, Rachman’s colleague Martin Wolf, the Financial Times’ associate editor and chief economics commentator, attends the Bilderberg Group meeting every year and hob-knobs with hundreds of the world’s power elite, and then routinely fails to report on it in the knowledge that if he did he’d be shunned by the very establishment that Rachman makes light of.

After all, 200+ global powerbrokers meeting in secret to discuss the future course of the planet doesn’t seem like a very interesting story now does it?

Perhaps Rachman should ask Wolf for an invite to Bilderberg 2009, and then he could stop hoping to be a member of the global elite and actually become one. With disgusting, anti-democratic and elitist opinions like his, I’m sure Bilderberg will welcome Rachman with open arms

Now do you believe me?

December 11, 2008

This is from Bloomberg so take notice people it is now mainstream finaly
Bernanke ‘War Powers’ Undermine Fed Bank Presidents (Update1)
Email | Print | A A A

By Craig Torres and Steve Matthews

Dec. 9 (Bloomberg) — The Federal Reserve’s interest-rate target is getting close to zero, and so is the power of the Fed’s regional bank presidents.

The district chiefs’ authority over borrowing costs has been marginalized in the past two months as Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and the Fed Board of Governors in Washington made their own decisions on emergency measures to flood the economy with cash.

“The Board has usurped authority,” said William Poole, former president of the St. Louis Fed and now a senior fellow at the Cato Institute in Washington. “This dramatic change in policy direction has not been announced or even acknowledged.”

Bernanke must now try to bring the Federal Open Market Committee, which includes district presidents and Fed governors, along as he turns to more radical strategies, such as buying Treasuries to drive down long-term rates. A lack of consensus at next week’s FOMC meeting could result in muddled communication that confuses investors and undermines confidence.

“Whatever our communications problems are now, they are going to be magnified in this new world we are going to be in,” James Bullard, Poole’s successor at the St. Louis Fed, said in an interview. “We have a bunch of analysis in the works right now. Frankly, I am mulling it over myself.”

Yields on 10-year Treasuries this month slid to the lowest level since at least 1962, in anticipation of Fed purchases and weaker growth. The notes yielded 2.73 percent at 10:32 a.m. in New York, compared with an average of 4.70 percent in the past decade.

Forgoing a Vote

A conference call last month showed how little say the central bank’s 12 regional presidents now have in some of the Fed’s biggest decisions.

The regional bank chiefs were invited to listen as officials in Washington outlined their decision on a new $600 billion program to help the housing market. The presidents weren’t asked to vote on the initiative, even though it aimed at cutting borrowing costs, something they vote on in regular FOMC meetings.

“If I am a regional Fed bank president, I have had my power diminished a lot,” said Ethan Harris, co-head of U.S. economic research at Barclays Capital Inc. in New York, who used to work at the New York Fed. “I think of it as war powers for the Board of Governors.”

Many of the new facilities have been studied and recommended by the New York Fed, whose president, Timothy Geithner, is the vice chairman of the FOMC. Geithner, President-elect Barack Obama’s nominee to be Treasury secretary, is leaving the FOMC and will be replaced at the Dec. 15-16 meeting by Christine Cumming, the New York Fed’s first vice president.

Emergency Powers

Regional bank presidents don’t have a vote when the Board uses emergency powers to lend to firms other than banks in “unusual and exigent circumstances,” as it’s done repeatedly this year.

The district-bank chiefs by design are supposed to offer a counterbalance to the Board, and in the past haven’t been shy about challenging chairmen. In February 1994, former chairman Alan Greenspan had to argue against four presidents who wanted to raise rates at least a half percentage point, compared with his own preference for a quarter-point move.

Greenspan worried about the effect on markets of an abrupt move, transcripts of FOMC discussions showed. He said he “also would be concerned if this committee were not in concert. If we are perceived to be split on an issue as significant as this, I think we’re risking some very serious problems in this organization.”

Fed’s Strategies

The Fed has deployed two main strategies during the current credit crisis. The FOMC, which currently includes five governors and five presidents, has lowered its benchmark federal funds rate target by 4.25 percentage points
since September 2007.

Acting separately, the Board of Governors has provided emergency funding to gridlocked markets and troubled institutions such as American International Group Inc. that were on the brink of failure. Those actions have made the key rate less relevant as a tool of policy, because they’ve driven down the overnight lending rate between banks below the target set by the FOMC.

While the target is 1 percent, the effective federal funds rate averaged 0.33 percentage point in the past week.

“The federal funds rate is trading persistently below target,” said Poole, who is a contributor to Bloomberg News. “That can’t be an accident.”

With its new $600 billion program, the Fed has stepped out of its traditional role of backstop liquidity provider, making a direct effort to manipulate long-term mortgage rates. Some presidents are wary of any strategy that appears to subsidize debtors by pushing rates below yields set by the market.

Allocating Credit

“Central bank lending policies should avoid straying into the realm of allocating credit across firms or sectors of the economy,” Philadelphia Fed President Charles Plosser said Dec. 2.

Richmond Fed President Jeffrey Lacker warned last week that officials should avoid any plan that would have the central bank pay for a fiscal stimulus. Obama has put an economic recovery program at the top of his agenda when he takes office Jan. 20. Lawmakers in Congress have suggested that the size of such a program may be between $500 billion and $700 billion.

“I personally do not believe the Fed should tie asset purchases to any specific fiscal programs, whatever their merits,” Lacker said after a speech in Charlotte, North Carolina, Dec. 3. At the same time, he said he was open to purchasing U.S. government debt for the purpose of fighting the danger of deflation.

FOMC Meeting

At next week’s meeting, Board officials will likely propose ways to lower longer-term interest rates so mortgage and corporate borrowers can borrow more cheaply. Bernanke said in a Dec. 1 speech the Fed could purchase Treasury or agency securities in “substantial quantities.” District presidents may simply be asked to support and expand on what the Board has already done.

“The Board’s importance has grown at the expense of the FOMC,” said Dino Kos, former markets director at the New York Fed and now managing director of research firm Portales Partners LLC. “The FOMC meeting itself is going to become a very uncomfortable place if people don’t know what they are there for. Institutional issues are at stake.”

To contact the reporters on this story: Craig Torres in Washington at; Steve Matthews in Atlanta at 1310 or

Last Updated: December 9, 2008 10:34 EST
This is the start of the Bankster take over of the USA and I recommend you go look for the articles calling for World government. A Telegraph article just covered it and described it as Tyranical.
If you want to know who the banksters are who will be ruling you then look where the money went in this article in the San Francisco Business News

U.S. bailout, cash infusions at $8.5T

Wichita Business Journal – by the Charlotte Business Journal

Federal bailouts, equity buys into banks and investment houses, liquidity infusions by the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank, loan guarantees and economic-stimulus checks now total $8.5 trillion.

That equals about 60 percent of the U.S. gross domestic product, according to economists.

The $8.5 trillion total is nearly twice the size of annual GDP in Japan and accounts for more than the annual GDP of every national economy except the United States, the European Union and China, according to federal data.

It includes the $700 billion bank and Wall Street bailout, federal takeovers of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, individualized bailouts of Citigroup Inc. (NYSE:C) and American International Group Inc. (NYSE:AIG), and various cash infusions into financial and lending markets by the Fed.

The $700 billion includes federal equity buys into Charlotte-based Bank of America Corp. (NYSE:BAC), JP Morgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM), Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (NYSE:GS) and other financial institutions.

The $8.5 trillion total was determined by various economists and the San Francisco Chronicle.

If you want to survive this when the dollar is massively de-valued you must take advantage of one thing in your favour NOW. For reasons beknown only to the Banksters the price of Silver and Gold is being suppressed still. By rights Gold should be up between $2,000 and $3,000 per ounce, however it is still at just under $800 today. You need to get all your money into Gold coin while it is still suppressed so that your savings hold value through the designed recession. Then you will come out the other side unchanged. Do it NOW as Gold is getting short in supply

9/11 by former head of Pakistani Intelligence

December 10, 2008

This is getting more and more interesting. Here is a transcript of the interview with Hamid Gul who headed the ISI in Bhutto’s government when the CIA were working with Pakistan to assist in the Afghan war that they were backing to assist their man Usama Bin Laden and the Mujahadin in fighting the Soviet Union. This therefore is a man with very detailed knowledge about which intelligence services run which groups in the Middle East and Asia

He first went on record about his knowledge 2 weeks ago after the False Flag attack in Mumbai which was supposed to start war between India and Pakistan failed (so far) to do so, mainly because of the internet news sites getting behind the mainstream news veil.

Since he has started going public the West has now tried to list him as a “terrorist” and are attempting to silence him (as in the censored CNN interview) or tarnish him.

This is an old tactic which you probably saw this week in Illinois when the Governor was arrested for corruption the day after he stood up and told his constutuents and Illinois businesses to stop doing business with Bank of America after they refused to put liquidity back into the State’s industry after receiving their bailout.

Well read the transcript of Gul’s comments on 9/11 and I will add a comment at the end

Ex-ISI Chief Gul Exposes 9/11 Inside Job

Former Pakistani ISI chief Hamid Gul appeared on Independant Radio in the US yesterday and shared his contention that the 9/11 attack was an inside job, laying out details that were censored during a CNN interview on the same subject last weekend.

Gul served as the director general of Pakistan’s Inter Services Intelligence during 1987-89 and worked with the CIA in the covert war against the Soviets in Afghanistan, helping to train the U.S.-backed mujahideen.

During the CNN interview on Sunday, host Fareed Zakaria attacked Gul and claimed his opinions on 9/11 were “thoroughly discredited,” but the majority of the evidence he presented for 9/11 being a false flag attack was edited out by CNN bosses.

No such censorship took place during the interview yesterday as Gul got in depth on why he considered 9/11 to be a staged event.

Gul said that he first went public on who he thought was behind 9/11 UPI two weeks after the attacks, but that the report was blocked by the western news media.

The UPI interview with Gul remains online and in it he questions the delayed response to the hijackings by the U.S. Air Force.

“9/11 took place on American soil, not a single person has been caught inside America even though for doing such a job I think a huge amount of logistic support is required in the area where such an operation is carried out,” Gul told the Alex Jones Show, adding that fighter jets were scrambled in the opposite direction to where the hijacked planes were heading as the attack unfolded.

“It is quite amazing that for a very long period of time the air traffic control did not report this nor did the U.S. Air Force act in time,” said Gul, noting that fighters were scrambled from bases further away than where the hijacked planes were.

“The time that it took was enormous, it was 120 minutes, a very long time in which to act – was the U.S. Air Force sleeping and if it was sleeping which heads were rolled?” asked Gul, adding that if the botched response was a mere intelligence failure then why was nobody disciplined or taken to task and why had nobody resigned.

“The air traffic control should have been re-hashed, it should have been turned inside out, but nothing of the sort happened,” said Gul.

Gul then questioned why standard operating procedure was not followed, stating, “In the past within minutes the U.S. aircraft has been on the wing of the hijacked aircraft, in this case it did not happen, the U.S. alert system is so high and it is so sophisticated that if a missile was to take off from Moscow and was to head towards New York, the U.S. Air Force and the missile system is supposed to intercept it within nine minutes….the system is in place but it did not work and nobody tried to question this.”

Gul then highlighted the implausible proficiency of alleged Flight 77 lead hijacker Hani Hanjour, who according to his flight instructors could barely fly a Cessna yet supposedly pulled off maneuvers that crack military pilots would have difficulty achieving in order to hit the Pentagon.

“The height (of the plane) was 9,000 (feet) and it came within seconds to a height of 1,000 and then went straight into its target, this is not possible for a person who has been trained on a light aircraft to be able to do this,” said Gul.

Gul said that he routinely confronts American journalists about why they do not probe into 9/11, and that they respond by telling Gul that the Patriot Act gets in the way and they are “not supposed to ask such questions”.

Gul said that as a result of 9/11 “everything has gone wrong with the world” and the motive behind the events being staged were largely geopolitical, and were used to exploit a window of opportunity for the U.S. to go into strategic areas where there was no U.S. presence before, as well as beating China in dominating the energy tap of the world, the middle east and south Asia.

Gul joins a raft of former government officials and intelligence heads in questioning 9/11, the most recent of which was former Italian President Francesco Cossiga, who last December said that the attacks were carried out by elements of the CIA and Mossad.

I will do a 9/11 blog soon because I think for a lot of people it has to be understood before you can take in the full scale of what is going on. For now though just watch this really really short video of World Trade Centre Building 7 and you will see why Mr Gul and half the world are saying 9/11 was a False Flag operation

Remember, it takes weeks to rig up a building to fall like that in a controlled demolition. You don’t just decide to do it that afternoon

%d bloggers like this: