Archive for July, 2009

Looting the poor and how to quell the angry mob

July 27, 2009

Below is an article from the blog of Catherine Austin Fitts, who is an investment banker and also was a high level official in the Administration of George Bush Snr. In this article she explains how the current flu scam is part of a larger agenda linked not only to the economic looting of the west but the neccessary cover-up to protect themselves from the angry mob of newly impoverished people.
Swine Flu: What I Believe
July 22, 2009 at 10:07 am
I believe one of the goals of the swine flu vaccine is depopulation. Perhaps it is the goal of a swine flu epidemic as well, whether bio-warfare or hype around a flu season.
These days, I keep remembering my sense of urgency leaving the Bush Administration in 1991. We had to do something to turn around the economy and gather real assets behind retirement plans and the social safety net. If not, Americans could find themselves deeply out on a limb. I felt my family and friends were in danger. They did not share my concern. They had a deep faith in the system.
As my efforts to find ways of reengineering government investment in communities failed to win political support, Washington and Wall Street moved forward with a debt bubble and globalization that was horrifying in its implications for humanity.
Overwhelmed by what was happening, I estimated the end result. My simple calculations guessed that we were going to achieve economic sustainability on Earth by depopulating down to a population of approximately 500 million people from our then current global population of 6 billion. I was a portfolio strategist used to looking at numbers from a very high level. Those around me could not fathom how all the different threads I was integrating could lead to such a conclusion. To me, we had to have radical change in how we governed resources or depopulate. It was a mathematical result.
A year later, in 1999, a very capable investment and portfolio strategist asked me if he could come have a private lunch with me in Washington. We sat in a posh restaurant across from the Capitol. He said quietly that he had calculated out where the derivatives and debt bubble combined with globalization were going. The only logical conclusion he could reach was that significant depopulation was going to occur. He said his estimates led to an approximate population of 500 million. I said very quietly, “that’s my estimate too.” I will never forget the look of sadness that crossed his face. I was amazed to find someone else who understood.
It turns out that we were not alone. Sir James Goldsmith had warned of the consequences of GATT in 1994. He described the process under way, involving the loss of land and livelihood for 3 billion people, “…This is the establishment against the rest of society.” Voices were rising around the planet as hardships exploded from global economic warfare and industrialization of agriculture.
As trillions of dollars were shifted out of America by legal and illegal means to reinvest in Asia and emerging markets and to build a global military empire, we left a sovereign nation economic model behind. Finally, the expense and corruption of empire resulted in bailouts of $12-14 trillion, delivering a new financial war chest to the people leading the financial engineering. Now we have exploding unemployment, an exploding federal deficit, an Inspector General for the TARP bailout program predicting that the ultimate bailout cost could rise to $23.7 trillion and a Congressional Budget Director who is concluding that we can no longer afford the social safety net.
That is, unless you change the actuarial assumptions in the budget – like life expectancy. Lowering immune systems and increasing toxicity levels combined with poor food, water and terrorizing stress will help do the trick. Review the history of vaccines rushed into production without proper testing and peer review – it is clear about the potential side effects. In addition, a plague can so frighten and help control people that they will accept the end of their current benefits (and the resulting implications to life expectancy) without objection. And a plague with proper planning can be highly profitable. Whatever the truth of what swine flu and related vaccines are, it can be used as a way to keep control in a situation that is quickly shifting out of control.
In short, an epidemic can be used to offset the inflation of capital with increasing deflation of the value and income of labor and continual demand destruction. It is a great deal of time and money spent on something that will not help build a real economy. The disinformation and control opportunities are profound. They keep the slow burn going. It is the next, meaner face of “the establishment against the rest of society.”
That’s what I believe. I am not an expert. I have no case worth presenting in a court of law. There are hundreds of hours of research on the swine flu and related vaccines that I have not done and I am not going to do. It is just what I believe, listening to the people I respect, and in no small part because if you map out all the financial ecosystems around the issue and people and incentives involved, it seems to me to be the logical conclusion.
Now, if this sounds ludicrous to you, it may be because you do not appreciate how dark the culture has become that is now in charge. Do you have any idea how impossibly frustrating it is to manage a highly centralized system in which the vast majority of people lack any responsibility to ensure that the whole thing works? Everyone wants their free lunch and there are no real markets or democracy to force accountability or a shared intelligence. 
Force works. Force has increasingly become the way to achieve most everything. Using force is a lot easier that living with rising risk and the costs of subsidizing an aging population.
So the question for you and me is “what do we do?” Are we going to take a vaccine? Are we going to allow our children to be vaccinated? Will we have a choice? How can we organize to make sure that we do? Is self-quarantine a practical option? How would we prepare for it?
What you believe is your responsibility. The time has come to build time into Summer schedules to research options, discuss them with those you trust and make informed decisions about what you believe and what actions you intend to take under a variety of scenarios.
I don’t have the answers yet. Somehow, I believe we can find them together. And while we do, let’s remember to pray for the love of humanity to be rekindled and nourished in each and every heart.

This is why we must do our duty

July 26, 2009
Today the last remaining “Tommy” died

This day should be one that will remind people ,who so far have done nothing, to get up and mobilize and help fight for themselves and their families against this common enemy

Comment after article:

Britain’s last WW1 veteran dies


Harry Patch, the last survivor of World War I to fight in the trenches, has died.

He passed away this morning at a care home in Somerset, aged 111.

The home released a statement which read: “It is with much sadness that we must announce the death of Mr Harry Patch.

Funeral arrangements are being made in accordance with Mr Patch’s wishes, and we wish to extend our deepest sympathies to his family, friends and the residents and staff of Fletcher House.”

Mr Patch was a machine-gunner in the Duke of Cornwall’s Light Infantry and fought during the Battle of Passchendaele, in Ypres, which claimed the lives of more than 70,000 soldiers.

He became Britain’s oldest man when another veteran of the war, Henry Allingham, died a week ago.


The men of Harry Patch’s generation did not stand idly by and pretend it wasn’t happening. These men, your great-grandparents or grandparents, who fought in conditions you wouldn’t dare walk into. Hand to hand combat, mud, wet, disease, hunger, gas, bombs and bullets raining down on you, and when you were ordered you would have to go up over the trench and run through a hail of lead to gain 50 yards while your friends dropped dead beside you. These men did it because they valued their families and the freedom they had

You are not being asked to do what these men had to, you are being asked to wake up and understand the reality around you. To do what you can by voting out the criminal elites, by writing and e-mailing, by protesting and supporting others, by helping your neighbour and standing side by side with those threatened by the system. All you are being asked to do is care. Just to care what you are leaving behind for the next generation. To take responsibility for now and stop the decline of our world into the hands of the criminal elites.

If the day comes too when you must raise a hand to help a victim then you must do that too, but first you must try every means possible to get the police, the army, the federal forces and anyone else on the side of the people for when the time comes and the people stand together the whole pyramid of power will come crashing down

You owe this to the millions of men and women who died fighting so that this oppression would never happen again. You will be shamed forever if you disrespect the names of those brave souls who gave you the chance to live freely and fail them


What do you think is Obama’s agenda with his strange list of appointees ?

July 25, 2009
What do you think is going on with these crazy Obama appointments to high office?

First we have Timothy Geithner appointed to the Treasury. A man who hadn’t even paid his taxes, who has been for the last few years Head of the New York Federal Reserve. This is the very bank closest to the Wall Street wholesale destruction of the US economy. An insider. A man who has been a regular at the Bilderberg meeting for the last half dozen years (so he was clear of his master’s intentions). He seems to have been put in place to control the cover-up of his own and his friends misdemeanors. Another man involved in the wholesale looting, Larry Summers, also got the nod as chief economic adviser. Larry is also a recent attendee of the Bilderberg group in 2008 (where the jobs were allocated) and was involved in the de-regulation process that caused this economic disaster. Can you smell a corruption ?

Then we have the appointment of the new Science Adviser John Holdren, who in his books written in the 1970s espoused the virtues of eugenics on the population, including forced abortion, sterilization through the water supply (which is actually happeningwith fluoride anyway) and mandatory implants in women. Also the removal of children from single parents. It is quite a read, and some passages from the 1977 book are included in this article.

This, just after the scandal of the Supreme Court judge who said that we have too many of the “wrong types of people”, should be switching you on to questioning whether your government has been taken over by a group of eugenicists. You might be surprised when you do some background reading about it considering The Rockefeller family, who run the Bilderberg and CFR and Tri-lateral Commission as well as funding the UN and WHO, have for one hundred years now been linked to the world eugenics movement and even funded Hitlers eugenics project’s in Nazi Germany as well as research in the US through the Rockefeller Foundation. Remembering of course that Obama’s two main advisers in Kissinger and Brzezinski are both employees of Rockefeller and Obama’s first job was for Kissinger (who is also the Bilderberg kingpin).

There are other appointment we could look at like Sotomayor who seems to have been brought in simply to facilitate the removal of the 2nd amendment but to keep this short let’s move on

Now the latest appointment of Obama’s Food Czar is soaked is even more controversy with wide ranging consequences for your health. Michael Taylor the former Monsanto vice president has been given charge of the FDA and Dennis Wolff has been given charge of Agriculture and Food Safety. Why should you be concerned?

Well, it is just latest in the revolving door of appointments to these posts since the 1990’s of lobbyists of Big Agri-business companies, in particular Monsanto. Taylor has been a Monsanto lobbyists and Wolff is a proponent of Monsanto’s Bovine Growth Hormone that has been proven to cause human cancer. These are the people who successfully lobbied so that labelling didn’t have to tell you that your food was genetically modified

Monsanto are the reason your diet is now poisoned by Genetically Modified food. They use seeds that have pesticide inbuilt and seeds that will only grow using their own brand of round-up spray. You cannot escape these chemicals. they also splice in all manner of genes of insects and fungi into the seeds causing unknown gene mutations in the crop andin your bowel bacteria. There GM food has been found to be seriously nutrient deficient also. Remember Monsanto cotton seed is the reason behind the failed crops and suicides of 200,000 Indian farmers. The same Monsanto who had it written into the Iraqi handover of power that the country’s farmers can only use their patented seeds and may not keep heirloom seeds any longer

This article below is how the Huffington Post viewed the appointment

and also on Prison planet they take a more rounded look at the whole recent history surrounding the position

Shouldn’t you be asking yourselves WHY?

Why does your government want Monsanto to run your food safety with their record? Why do they seem to want to force nutrient deficient genetically modified foods on you ? Can it really be for the betterment of your health? Nutrient deficient food and in 6 months time Codex Alimentarius will ban nutrient supplements too. What do you think they are trying to do to you? Anyone would think they wanted to suppress your immune system and make you susceptible to illnesses? Certainly looks like it doesn’t it?

So the banks now run the Treasury. Big Agri-business now run the Food. They along with Big-Pharma industry run the FDA. Lobbyists from the arms manufacturers run the defense department. Big Pharma lobbyists run the Health Dept. Does this not smack of a takeover to you? Does this not feel like a conflict of interest? Does this not feel to you like you are being raped by these billionaires and they will subject you to any poison or drug or food additive or illegal war just to make a nice fat profit?

Is this really how you think your government should be run?

Who benefits?


Obama breaks his only remaining election promise

July 22, 2009
They are laughing at you folks, not with you

They are laughing at you folks, not with you

Barrack Obama made many promises during his election campaign. He swept the  willing masses along with promises of Hope and Change. He explained how he was a constitutionalist and respected the founders views. He said that he didn’t believe that the Presidency should be accumulating more power outside it’s remit and suggested that the Bush Administration had done this.

So since his election what has happened

Before election he said he would ban lobbyists from the Whitehouse. Now most of his appointees are lobbyists

Before election he said he would bring the troops home from Iraq immediately. Now he has sent 30,000 more and there is no fixed timetable for withdrawal

Before election he said no Bills would be rushed through Congress or Senate and would have a minimum of 5 days to read them. Now the Bailout Bill was rushed through, two weeks ago he pushed through an 1,100 page Bill with only 1 day to read it and added a 300 page amendment at 3 AM that nobody could read. Also now the health-care Bill is getting the same “urgent” push

Before election he said he was against secret prison camps, illegal detention and torture. Now although he says he will close Gitmo, the timetable looks like years and these men will not be given freedom or even due process. None of the other secret prison camps around the world will be dealt with and have in fact increased in size

Before election he espoused the rule of law and liberty and freedom and the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Now he wants Military Tribunals and to imprison people for ten years for crimes they have not committed YET !

Before election he wanted smaller government not interfering in people’s lives. Now he thinks he can sack the board of a private company like Crysler

Before election he said the warrantless wiretapping was illegal. Now he has continued with the programme and allowed the NSA to legally use intercept hubs at exchanges

And  his final promise . . . .

Before election he said he would not use Signing Statement on parts of Bills he didn’t agree with like Bush did because it was illegal. Now he has done exactly that in the Defense Appropriations Bill

Does this littany of deception finally convince the rest of the die hard Democrat voters that they have been duped in exactly the same way that the Republican voters were duped into voting for Bush?

If you can all see this deception from both men is now real, you are ready to accept that there are no party lines for these people . They are just 2 sides of the same coin, and Rockefeller is flipping that coin

Abandon these liars now and vote for a strict constitutionalist who is not in those two corrupted parties

Handing over the government to the bankers is treason

July 22, 2009

The article below from the Daily Mail explains how Shadow Chancellor George Osborne has announced his plan to remove the independent regulator of the banks and hand power to carry out this function to the Bank of England. “Seems logical” I hear you say, “It is the Bank of England after all so they must have our best interests at heart surely”. Well, not exactly

What you are seeing unfold here is not one party (Conservative) promising to change a failed policy of the party in government (Labour) as a way of fixing the economy, even though that is exactly what it is supposed to make you believe

Read the article and I will explain why after in my comment:

Tory superbank: Osborne to scrap watchdog and give Bank of England powers to stop meltdown

By Sam Fleming and Tim Shipman
Last updated at 4:49 PM on 20th July 2009

The Bank of England will become a ‘superbank’ with unparalleled powers to prevent another financial meltdown under Tory plans announced today.
In a historic move, the Conservatives will give the Bank sweeping controls to regulate banks and building societies.
The plans are Shadow Chancellor George Osborne’s attempt to seize the mantle of reform from Gordon Brown, who granted the Bank independence to set interest rates when Labour won power in 1997.
The Tories will complete the revolution by handing it control of curbing bubbles in the housing market and consumer debt, clamping down on obscene City bonuses, and preventing future financial implosions. My vision: Shadow Chancellor George Osborne delivers a speech outlining Conservative Party plans on financial regulation and the economy, at Bloomberg HQ, in London. Their proposals will totally dismantle the failed system of City regulation set up by Mr Brown when he became Chancellor.
Now as Prime Minister, Mr Brown and Chancellor Alistair Darling have repeatedly pinned their faith on the Financial Services Authority to police the banks and resisted calls by Bank of England Governor Mervyn King for more powers.
But the Tories will scrap the FSA, which failed to prevent the reckless lending which led to the collapse of RBS and Northern Rock – both of which had to be bailed out by the taxpayer.
It would be replaced by a new Consumer Protection Agency, which would prevent families from being ripped off by financial firms. Offenders would be publicly named and shamed and banks forced to be transparent about account charges.
In a major step, the Bank would be granted responsibility for overseeing Britain’s insurance sector – currently in the hands of the FSA. All this comes on top of the Bank’s interest rate-setting tools. The Bank’s inflation target would be changed to incorporate house prices, which could help reduce the risk of future property bubbles.
Conservative Leader David Cameron said the tripartite system introduced by Gordon Brown was a ‘policy failure of historic proportions’ that was directly to blame for the crisis facing the country.
He dismissed the Government’s proposed reforms as inadequate measures that jeopardise recovery, promising instead to give sweeping new powers to the Bank of England.
Launching the reform plans, Mr Cameron said today: “The decisions that led to this crisis represent a policy failure of historic proportions. We now need deep, wide-ranging reform that matches both the magnitude of the crisis and the scale of the hardship inflicted on the British people.
‘The large, failed, British banks are the financial equivalent of Chernobyl. Like the former Soviet Union, the UK became over-reliant on dangerous financial reactors.
‘Since that misjudgement, they haven’t learned their lesson.”To prevent Britain from becoming the next Iceland, radical safety measures . . . are required. My approach to the City is not one of hostility, or of obsequiousness. I recognise its importance. But it needs “tough love”, not the freedom to run amok.’

Liam Byrne, the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, said: ‘David Cameron and George Osborne can talk all they like about banking reform, but when it mattered, they showed their inexperience and called it wrong.

‘They opposed the Government’s action to protect Northern Rock irrespective of the risks to savers and the wider economy.

“That reform must be based on a clear understanding of what went wrong in the first place and a clear determination to put it right.”

The debt crisis had been “at best ignored and at worst encouraged”, he said.
“For this, I believe the finger of blame points directly at the system of financial regulation established by Gordon Brown in 1997.

“At its heart was the tripartite system; a system in which no-one was looking at the big picture, no-one had responsibility and authority to act and no-one was effectively in charge.

“So those bad debts, those risky loans, the soaring house prices, the systemic risk, the asset price bubble – they all fell between the cracks of the system.
“I’m afraid the Government’s proposals that all we need are a few more tweaks and a little bureaucratic tinkering are totally inadequate and risk preventing a recovery.”The reforms would hand greater powers to the ‘Old Lady of Threadneedle Street’ than at any time in its 315-year history, potentially triggering fears of a ‘democratic deficit’ at the heart of government, with too much influence handed to unelected Bank officials.

In putting so much faith in the Bank of England, the Tories will be accused of ignoring that institution’s considerable failings in the lead-up to the financial crisis. Mr King was criticised for doing too little to flag up the dangers of the debt bubble and soaring house prices.

To counter such concerns, the Tories are explicitly aiming to downgrade the status of the Governor within his own institution by creating a third deputy governor, who would oversee the Bank’s new Financial Regulation wing.
The Tory scheme runs directly counter to Treasury proposals this month to boost the FSA’s authority.

And they also clash with proposals from the Liberal Democrats, who will today argue that the FSA should be retained. The LibDems’ Treasury spokesman Vince Cable will also demand that highly paid bankers disclose details of their pay and he will call for Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds to be broken up before they are returned to public ownership.

In a speech to the London Stock Exchange today, Mr Cable will say: ‘Some aspects of the financial services industry are simply too big for the British economy to manage safely.

Read more:




So why is this a bad idea?

As I said above, what you are seeing unfold here is not one party (Conservative) attempting to change a failed policy of the party in government (Labour) as a way of fixing the economy, even though that is exactly what it is supposed to make you believe. You are actually seeing two phases of the same agenda from two parties who are two sides of the same coin.

Shakespeare famously said “All the world’s a stage and the people merely actors”. Well he was not joking. He was warning us of the reality that escapes us. This whole episode is a charade played out for our benefit to gain our support and consent to, if not demand, the next phase of the long term plan. Let me explain how it works.

Since the end of the 1990s the banking regulatory authorities have been weakened by legislation enabling the creation of a huge derivatives bubble which in effect is a bubble with no real assets to back it up. It is simply money out of thin air represented by numbers in a ledger. This de-regulation was going on in the USA starting with Clinton repealing the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999 (even with a majority of Republicans in the Houses) thus expanding the limitations of lending by removing a law that prevented the banks from over lending based on their assets. Then GW Bush made this worse by removing all limits on assets to loans ratios and allowing the banks to make investments with money that did not exist. The same process was going on in Britain during the Blair years and in other western nations. So you see how this is a bi-partisan con trick in most countries.

The fact that the financial regulators in all these western countries were seemingly unaware of the impending situation says to us that either they were limited by weakened legislation and powers of enforcement, or they were allowing this to happen and therefore were part of the problem. The fact that they all walked away with golden handshakes and huge pensions, despite their dreadful job performance, should sound alarm bells at least. This must also make it quite obvious to everyone that this could not possibly have been an oversight by such a large number of experienced people

Well, you would be right. The inflation of the derivatives bubble was not a mistake. It was created by design. We know this because it was leaked from the meetings of the rich and powerful over a decade ago and reported in the independent press on-line. More recently it was leaked from the Bilderberg Meeting in Ottawa in 2006, and reported by Daniel Estulin, that the wealthy elites that host this meeting had discussed the deliberate collapsing of the world economy using the derivatives bubble (and to blame the housing market).

The meeting is full of politicians from all western nations and International groups as well as multinational conglomerates, Royalty, and Media Groups. At this meeting in 2006 were the representatives of banks such as:

Timothy F. Geithner, President and CEO, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Dermot Gleeson, Chairman, Anglo Irish Bank Group
Ronald S. Lloyd, Chairman and CEO, Credit Suisse First Boston
Frank McKenna, Deputy Chair, Toronto Dominion Bank Financial Group
Gordon Nixon, President and CEO, Royal Bank of Canada
David Rockefeller, Former Member, JP Morgan International Council
Rudolf Scholten, Member of the Board of Executive Directors, Österreichische Kontrollbank AG
Peter D. Sutherland, Chairman, BP plc and Chairman, Goldman Sachs International

Many other banks have been present in years previous and since. However let me take one example in AIB. Dermot Gleeson the Head of Anglo Irish Bank has attended Bilderberg since 2003 to 2009 so has been well aware of the developing plan and his part in it. In 2004 for instance Thomas L. Donilon, Vice-President, Fannie Mae, (and Council on Foreign Relations) was present, presumably to discuss their part in the home loans side show that the US government would blame the crash on. So in the two years since the meeting in 2006 where they decided to inflate the bubble to bursting, AIB doubled the amount of it’s total lending exposure right before the crash in late 2008

Many of the same names re-appeared in the 2008 meeting plus other interesting ones like

Josef Ackermann, Chairman of the Management Board and the Group Executive Committee, Deutsche Bank AG
Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman, Board of Governors, Federal Reserve System
Harold E. Ford, Jr., Vice Chairman, Merill Lynch & Co., Inc
Seppo Honkapohja, Member of the Board, Bank of Finland
William J. McDonough, Vice Chairman and Special Advisor to the Chairman, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
Tom McKillop, Chairman, The Royal Bank of Scotland Group
Rudolf Scholten, Member of the Board of Executive Directors, Oesterreichische Kontrollbank AG
Jean-Claude Trichet, President, European Central Bank
Robert B. Zoellick, President, The World Bank Group

Notable are RBS, AIB, Merril Lynch, the companies at the centre of the collapse in the US, Britain and Ireland that was imminent. As well as these men, there were also present many Finance ministers and, for reference to the article above, also present at the meeting were the following attendees indicating the cross party co-operation for this agenda

Edward Balls, Economic Secretary to the Treasury (Labour)
Kenneth Clarke, Member of Parliament (Conservative)
George Osborne, Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer (Conservative)

Kenneth Clarke in fact is an ever present participant. George Osborne has been attending for the last 4 years, and Ed Balls has been attending since 2002. So again we see no party lines and long term involvement.

You may ask why we have never heard of any of this considering how important it is. Well the simple answer is because the people who attend this meeting also control your media. A few examples of this are in these recent attendees

Martin H. Wolf, Associate Editor and Economics Commentator, The Financial Times
John Micklethwait, Editor-in-Chief, The Economist
Vendelin von Bredow, Paris Correspondent, The Economist
Adrian D. Wooldridge, Foreign Correspondent, The Economist
Anatole Kaletsky, Editor at Large, The Times
Paul Gigot, Editorial Page Editor, The Wall Street Journal
Donald E. Graham, Chairman and CEO, The Washington Post Company
Matthias Nass, Deputy Editor, Die Zeit
Christine Ockrent, CEO, French television and radio world service
Eric Schmidt, Chairman of the Executive Committee and CEO, Google
Oscar Bronner, Publisher and Editor, Der Standard (Austria)
Nicolas Beytout, Editor-in-Chief, Le Figaro (France)
Juan Luis Cebrian, Grupo PRISA media group (Spain)
Heather Reisman, Chair and CEO, Indigo Books & Music Inc. (Canada)
John Vinocur, Senior Correspondent, International Herald Tribune (USA)
Conrad Black, Telegraph Group

So you see they have the economic and Financial press sewn up so that they only send out the message the Bilderberg Group wants the public to hear. Even the Director General of the BBC has attended around 2002

You may have noticed something in Europe whereby Britain and Ireland’s Prime Ministers both stepped down before the crash and left their fall guys to carry the can. This is what Gordon Brown and Brian Cowan are, however they will probably be well rewarded for this while Tony Blair will be free to become European President and Bertie Ahern will most probably be given a top job in Blair’s administration

Back to the article then, you can see that in Bilderberg there is no difference between Labour and Conservative, or Republican and Democrat. They are simply working together to carry out an agenda phase by phase. Hence Bilderberg has already decided that Gordon Brown will oversee the crash so that the Conservatives will win the next election, leaving George Osborne to implement the next stage of the agenda which is to remove independent regulation of the banks over to the Bank of England. While in Ireland the government has made a report of “urgent” budgetary measures, but has gone on summer break for 3 months and wont deal with it till autumn. By then the IMF will have taken over the country.

At this point you should also be aware that the IMF and World Banks are also owned by private banking families and the IMF ONLY lends money under the condition that they have a say in how the country is run. You have seen this time and again in Africa and the result is that the country ends up handing over it’s resources and lands to the private bankers in lieu of the IMF loans

What most people in Britain are not aware of is that the Bank of England is not exactly what it says on the tin. It is actually controlled by the Rothschild banking family and has been since the Napoleonic wars when Nathan Rothschild basically took over the country by buying up the stock market after it crashed when he gave out a story that his courier had brought news that Napoleon had won the battle of Waterloo, which was a simple and effective con. Recently just like Clinton, Brown gave the Bank total autocracy for monetary policy back in 1998 and since then, just like in the US with the autocratic Federal Reserve, certain financial houses have made extraordinary profits while the country heads for hyper-inflation.

George Osborne then will also give full regulatory powers to the privately run Bank of England to oversee the very banking institutions that control it. This is like asking the captain of one football team to referee the match he is playing in.. The net effect being that the Bank of England controllers will tilt everything in their own favour and use their power to absorb other banks and insurance houses to eliminate their competition and give them an unassailable position from which to orchestrate the new world order’s global financial governance agenda into being. This will be done after the nations have suffered massive hyper-inflation due to the policy of printing money to bail out the indebted banks of toxic debt that only ever existed in a balance sheet and never in reality. This bailout money of course gets re-directed straight back to the creditor banks who just happen to be the controllers of the Bank of England

The exact same thing has happened in the USA with Barrack Obama’s Senate colleagues using a procedural rule to block any attempt to pass Senator De Mint’s Audit the Federal Reserve amendment. Also Obama’s House speaker Nancy Pelosi is the one standing in the way of Ron Paul’s Audit the Fed Bill which now has 273 co-sponsors (63% of the House). At the same time Obama has introduced new legislation, the same as proposed by Osborne, to give the Federal Reserve even more power to regulate every aspect of the US economy, including the banking sector, i.e. themselves. Now does that sound like a President who wants CHANGE ? Seems to me to be exactly what Bush Jnr was pushing for.

So now you can see that in both nations the agenda is the same and the party lines mean nothing to them and are simply a play for the electorate to believe they are in control of their leaders. The reality is the people are not. The people are manipulated by the corporate owned press to elect the party the elites of this world want in power to carry out the next phase of their agenda

What is the agenda? One world government, one world currency, all controlled by the banking families that own our governments and who meet in secret at their Bilderberg club. This one world government will be a total control grid surveillance system. A cashless society. All movements monitored. All transactions monitored. All rights removed.

If this is the future you want you can have it but please don’t condemn the rest of us into it.


Look behind the corporate news for the real story

July 20, 2009
It has long been accepted that politics and corruption go hand in hand. Some people believe that power corrupts. Others believe that power attracts the corruptable. The reality today howerver is something a little different
Read the article below and I will comment on that reality at the end
Governors Discover Resisting the Fed Has Consequences

 Kevin Jones
July 19, 2009

Cynical observers of the U.S. political scene weren’t surprised when it was revealed in June 2009 that Mark Sanford, Governor of South Carolina, who is married, had been carrying on a long-term affair. Sanford admitted that the affair had been going on for at least a year and soon resigned as chairman of the Republican Governors Association.  

Sanford had resisted accepting stimulus funds for South Carolina from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, which he correctly saw as part of the process of bringing the states further under Federal control.

featured stories   Governors Discover Resisting the Fed Has Consequences  
Mark Sanford featured stories   Governors Discover Resisting the Fed Has Consequences
Matters became worse for Sanford when it was revealed the following month that he had visited and entertained his mistress, an Argentine commodities broker named María Belén Chapur, using public funds. As of this writing, Sanford is clinging to the governorship, but his hold appears to be tenuous.
Here’s the more interesting part. Earlier in 2009, Sanford had resisted accepting stimulus funds for South Carolina from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, which he correctly saw as part of the process of bringing the states further under Federal control. His resistance led to a lawsuit heard by the South Carolina Supreme Court, and the state was ultimately forced to accept the money.

The public humiliation of Mark Sanford following his fight against the U.S. Treasury Dept. and the Federal Reserve banks that control it is part of a clear and disturbing pattern:

Governors who speak out against member banks of the New York Federal Reserve and other major Wall Street institutions tend to be publicly humiliated and taken down through the discretionary leaking of compromising information.

Consider the case of former Gov. Eliot Spitzer of New York. Prior to serving as governor, he had been New York Attorney General, a role in which he made a name for himself by taking on organized crime and securities fraud. Among those he charged in lawsuits was Richard Grasso, former chairman of the New York Stock Exchange. Spitzer also campaigned against stock price inflation by investment houses, predatory practices by mortgage lenders, and mutual fund fraud. He continued to pursue his campaign against corrupt banking practices as governor.

In March 2008, the NewYork Times reported that Spitzer was a client of a prostitution ring then under investigation by the Federal government. Spitzer resigned two days later. Who leaked the information? The New York Times wasn’t saying. Could it have been retaliation for Spitzer’s campaign against Wall Street corruption?

Or consider the case of Rod Blagojevich, former governor of Illinois. He was nabbed by the Feds in December 2008 on a comprehensive catalog of charges, including wire fraud and solicitation of bribery. Many observers thought Blagojevich was simply carrying out business as usual and had simply had the misfortune of being caught.

The public was treated to the entertaining spectacle of politicians across the ideological spectrum—including” Blagojevich’s former allies and supporters—stumbling over one another to express their indignation and moral rectitude. Of course, none of them would do things like solicit bribes and accept kickbacks.

The day prior to his arrest, Blagojevich had declared that the State of Illinois would stop doing business with Bank of America, a member bank of the Federal Reserve. His action came in response to Bank of America’s cutting off a line of credit to a Chicago factory—an incident that had gained wide press coverage in the Chicago area and become a cause célèbre that Blagojevich would have been foolish to ignore.

Early on the morning of Dec. 8, 2008, the day following his declaration that Illinois would no longer deal with Bank of America, Blagojevich was taken away from his home in handcuffs by Federal agents. Interestingly, on the same morning but before the arrest had hit the news wires, quoted John Douglas, attorney for Bank of America and former general counsel for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., as describing Blagojevich’s declaration against Bank of America as “dangerous.”

 Dangerous for whom? For the banking industry, or for those who dare to resist it? Perhaps for both?

One former governor who has talked openly about the extortion game played against governors by the Federal government and the banks that own it is Jess Ventura, who served as Governor of Minnesota from 1999 to 2003. He ran for and won the governorship as an independent with Libertarian leanings, which placed him outside the political establishment.

Shortly after becoming governor, Ventura says he was summoned to a meeting with numerous people who turned out to be agents of the Central Intelligence Agency. In a television interview, Ventura said:

I wouldn’t have known a CIA guy if he would’ve came up and bit me. I went to my old friends, my old teammates to try to get advice to pick up why they were questioning me and he was exactly right. He said, ‘They didn’t see you coming.’ They wanted to know if there were more independent governors on the horizon.”

Ventura correctly pointed out to the agents—if indeed that is what they were—that their domestic operation was illegal. He has since concluded that the agents were there to let him know who’s really in charge at the state level, and that it isn’t the state governors and legislatures.

A holder of public office needn’t be a governor to feel the nip of the wringer after criticizing member banks of the Federal Reserve. Just ask Sen. Richard Durbin of Illinois.

Never one to conceal what he really thinks, Sen. Durbin appeared on a Chicago radio talk show near the end of April 2009 and said, “And the banks—hard to believe in a time when we’re facing a banking crisis that many of the banks created—are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place.”

A month and a half later, Durbin was blindsided by accusations that he had sold more than $115,000 worth of stock after being tipped off to the severity of the financial crisis during a closed meeting with Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke in Sept. 2008.

The Chicago Sun-Times, which broke the “story,” reported that Durbin had bought about $43,000 worth of Berkshire Hathaway stock the same day he had liquidated his mutual funds and eventually invested a total of about $98,000 with the Oracle of Omaha’s fund.

A Durbin spokesman correctly pointed out that “Durbin was doing what a lot of other people were doing, taking a look at their savings” and seeing it “start to tank and trying to preserve some level of wealth by getting out of the market.”

This non-scandal has since gone nowhere, and in fact the original story has disappeared from the Sun-Times’ archives. But perhaps Durbin has gotten the message: If you’re a high-profile holder of public office, you don’t question or resist the banks.

As corrupt or immoral as many of them may be, governors and members of Congress probably deserve more pity than scorn. After all, most private citizens are subjected merely to passive surveillance—our telephone conversations and e-mails are filtered through facilities run by the National Security Agency in partnership with AT&T and other telecommunications companies that search out “hot” keywords. Our communications aren’t examined by a human being unless they’re flagged as containing something “suspicious.”

Governors and members of Congress, on the other hand, are far more likely to be placed under active surveillance—their communications are routinely eavesdropped upon by security personal working for the advancement of the takeover of the Federal government by Federal Reserve and its member banks, both domestic and foreign.

So before becoming too outraged at the next story about a corrupt governor or member of Congress, remember that we’re all living under the same tyranny. High-profile politicians are simply more likely to be humiliated when successfully nailed for refusing to go along with the program. In any story involving the humiliation of one of them, always look for the banking connection. You’ll usually find one.


What we are actually seeing the results of here is a long CIA run ecercise on behalf of the banking elite owners of the Federal Reserve and owners of the US government by virtue of this excercise. What these people do is find up and coming politians before they make their name and pay off escort agencies or other rogue companies to entrap these people in illegal or illicit activity. They either sting them or covertly record them.
 After this has been achieved they then promote these people into high office and by this method control the government through blackmail. The rewards are great for those who play by the bankers’ rules, but if you step oyut of line they will destroy you.
This is politics these days. This is how they have taken over America and Europe



Criminal charges of Genocide lodged against world Elites

July 16, 2009


Please follow this to the end where you will find all the information about the charges laid against the UN, WHO, World leaders and Multinationals and how you can take part in this to stop this vaccination genocide

The controlled mainstream media’s Government hype about the imminent so called “Swine Flu” pandemic is continuing unabated and they are upping the stakes now, proposing the need for mandatory vaccinations of all people. There are hundreds of articles pushing this line with and endless barrage of fear and disinformation.

Yet, at the same time, they are failing to report anything on the mass criticism of this whole scenario from the medical community who have researched the virus and found it to be most probably man made. More importantly still they have failed to report anything on the scandal in January this year when the company who is manufacturing the “Swine Flu” vaccine for the W.H.O. was caught mixing live Avian flu into the normal human flu vaccine and sending it out for manufacture around the world. Perhaps even more importantly, nobody is reporting that a shareholder of this company “Baxter Pharmaceutical” is none other than the man who is proposing to vaccinate every American, Barrack Obama. Can anyone say “conflict of interest”?

Here is a brief interview Wayne Madsen did on Russia Today. Wayne is a former NSA man and now investigative journalist who has been on top of this story since the first outbreak. Here he re-iterates the common belief that the virus is made in a lab reconstituted from the 1918 Spanish flu dug up by US military and in fact funded, I have read, by the Rothschild banking dynasty (renowned for being at the very top of the Globalist New World Order group and controlling owners many Central Banks including the Federal Reserve and the IMF)

The depth of this deception is truly stunning and the amount of corruption throughout governments, military and security forces, scientific and pharmaceutical groups, bankers and World bodies beggars belief. However for something this huge to be perpetrated there has to be an agenda far more important than money, because these people are not short of that.

The real danger is not the virus, it is the vaccine. The WHO back in the 1970s laid out the plan to use a 3 part vaccine to depopulate the world as follows

Vaccine 1 – disables the immune system

(the more “at risk” people start to die of flu and clamour for  vaccines)

Vaccine 2 – introduces the Spanish flu variant into the host

(which only kills healthy people with strong immune systems)

Vaccine 3 – re-enables the immune system and  then the virus hyper-activates the immune system and healthy people die from drowning in their own blood

(authorities blame a mutation of the virus for their vaccine’s failure)

If you don’t think they mean business getting this vaccine into you then listen to this  phone enquiry regarding vaccine exemption

The Nuremberg Code outlines why this is illegal, yet this is being disregarded

The real agenda is power, control, removal of rights and depopulation. The following series of links are of criminal charges lodged in Austria and at the US Embassy in Austria. These charges detail the scale of the genocidal  criminal plot and goes through the legislation that has been put into place prior to this event to enable the world governing bodies like the UN, WHO to seize control of all signed up countries to it’s treaty and put them into martial law. Signatories to the UN Treaty must vaccinate at gunpoint if required to by the UN or WHO. It has escaped most but not all people in America what is happening around them. Note well when Congressman Ron Paul mentions medical emergency here.

These are real legal charges against the highest level officials up to and including Presidents like Obama, Bush and Heads of the UN and WHO, International Bankers and Pharmaceuticals and regulators. Please read on because you can take part in this too

Jane Bergermeister has been the originator of these proceedings and at a huge personal cost. Only this week this award winning employee has somehow lost her job. However she does not intend to be intimidated into dropping this case which could uncover the massive criminal network behind this. Here is a short biography on Jane Bergermeister

The incredible amount of evidence she has compiled here is essential reading and it highlights the full scope of the international crime syndicate and how the legislative arm of this syndicate has put all the legal framework into place in preparation for this event

This link is an overview of the criminal charges Jane has levies against Baxter Pharmaceutical and Avir Green Hills Biotechnology

This is an English translation of the actual charges and evidence submitted to the police and courts in Austria

This link will give you advice and documents on how you can use this evidence to lodge a similar complaint with your own District Court in your country or seek an injunction on the use of the vaccine in your country. Within this document are two links at the top that give you pre-prepared forms to use to file the charges in the USA set up so they are ready for you to fill them in, Criminal Charges and Evidence

The following links are to an interview Jane Bergermeister did with Dr Rebecca Carley. In this interview the discussion covers the charges laid and how you can help by filing charges in your own country. Thankfully this radio show goes out to the military around the world and may well be a catalyst for soldiers, who are being used as guinea pigs for the flu, to refuse injections and turn the military back to the side of the people

Part 1

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Please help in this cause and file charges in as many countries and as many states as possible so that this cannot be ignored and we can smash this international crime syndicate together

Thank you

Last blog on 360 (No. 559) A POEM by Door32

July 13, 2009
Last blog on 360 (No. 559) A POEM by Door32 magnifyYapoo !


So farewell

Then, Yahoo 360

You gave us a platform

To express ourselves when

There was nothing on

The telly

And meet like minded people

From around all 360

Degrees of the world

Like in your name

But you thought Facebook was better

Than your page

So you closed it and lost

All your users and a big money buyout

From that twit Gates

You have posted content

In violation of our Community

Guidelines or Terms

Of Service

Yes ,

That was your catchphrase

EJ Thribb (aged 17.25)

Double Standards in the “Land of the Free”

July 10, 2009

How many of you were aware that former Congresswoman and 2008 US Presidential candidate Cynthia McKinney has just been released after spending a week in an Israeli jail along with 20 other people? News to you? Well that probably goes to show the level of coverage the mainstream media gave it. I haven’t found any news clips from mainstream sources at all, but correct me if I am wrong.

Here is the interview Cynthia did on after being deported home following her week in prison. She outlines how the boat she was on carrying medical supplies and childrens toys to Gaza was heading from Cyprus to Gazan territorial waters. Before they ever reached there they were basically kidnapped in an act of piracy in international waters by the Israeli navy, taken around Gazan waters to Israel and imprisoned for a week. Listen to the interview about the treatment they received



Now, don’t you think it is strange that someone of her status in the US being kidnapped by the Israelis in international waters and imprisoned should have been the number one item on the main evening news for the entire week? It should be an act of war shouldn’t it?

You don’t think so? Why? What is wrong with your sense of logic simply because it is Israel?

Say any old John Smith US citizen was kidnapped in international waters in the Straights of Hormuz by the Iranian navy and imprisoned. How do you think the media and the government would cover that incident? It would be the international incident that would start World War III and you know it. So why the non event in this case? Where was the special government envoy? Where was the high level condemnation, not just for the kidnapping but for the illegal naval blockade of the Gazan waters?

What does this tell you about your Government?

What does this tell you about your Mainstream media?

Isn’t it obvious? It tells you they are corrupt and it also tells you that they are liars and it also tells you that they are both run by people who are more supportive of Israel that they are of your own country.

Almost ALL of your mass media, newspapers, magazines, television, radio, cable, films, and even internet network sites are owned by Jewish people with a zionist leaning. Is it any wonder you never see a word printed against Israel. Also a large number of senior posts in the US administration are also filled by Dual citizens of ISrael and the US and Israel always comes first. Any other politicians have ALL been to AIPAC to beg for campaign money and cowtail to their masters in Israel.

Your country has become an appologist and supporter of genocide in Palestine and you have all been tricked into supporting it by a lying media and a lying government. If this incident does not prove that to you then absolutely nothing will and you are a lost cause with a dead soul

I bet you didn’t know about those gas deposits either did you. Now I wonder what the Israelis are doing with them. You don’t think they could be…… . . . . . stealing them do you, while they starve the Gazans to death?

All these years they got your unwavering support yet it is the same “nations” bankers who have brought your country to it’s knees and bled you dry for the next two generations by printing 15 trillion dollars and paying it to themselves in the last 6 months. How they must be laughing at you.

Where was your great Obama on this one huh? Change? Hope? Bullshit !


Assessment of fear in the community by Senior Policeman

July 10, 2009

Scott Wagner (via e-mail)

Friday, July 10, 2009

Scott Wagner is a Police Academy Commander and Professor at Columbus State Community College in Columbus Ohio, and Commander of the 727 Counter Terror Training Unit. A 29 year law enforcement veteran, and current Deputy Sheriff, he is the Precision Marksman for the Union County Sheriff’s Office SRT Team.

The fear on the street is palpable to anyone who is paying attention. Ever since the election of Barack Obama as President of these United States in November 2008, coupled with the election of a democrat party majority in both the U.S. House and Senate, concern for the United States and personal safety has ignited like a fire in dry grass.

Sales of guns – black guns, rifles, shotguns and handguns (particularly 9mm) everywhere, have gone through the roof. AR15s have literally flown off of dealer shelves, and only now in the spring of 2009, have I seen the display samples of ARs begin to reappear on the wall of my favorite shooting emporium after the initial post election rush. Manufacturers of ARs are still working to catch up and some of the major suppliers are as much as 150,000 guns behind. Not only that, ammo is in the shortest supply I have ever seen in the 43 years of my shooting life. Have you recently tried to get 5.56mm, 9mm or even 380 ammo?

Supplies of 5.56mm and 9mm ammo are in short supply due to the black gun buying craze; .380ACP because of the rise in people getting concealed carry permits and the resurgence of interest in convenient 380 handguns like the fine Ruger LCP. In fact, in doing a review of the Ruger LCP, my gun store only had a small supply of ONE .380 round on hand, the Winchesters 95-grain SXT, which they had just gotten in. Unfortunately, I had to do a 30-round review of that pistol. There was none other to be found.

What is odd about this new fear is that it is not coming from the average citizen gun owner out there, but it is coming from what to me is an almost shocking source: street cops.

Street cops and SWAT cops that I know from various agencies – rural, suburban and metro – in my area are scared. Cops that before November 2008 never gave much thought (that I knew of anyway) to politics or more importantly to gun rights. For the most part, these are the guys that didn’t generally have any interest in shooting or gun ownership beyond keeping track of where their duty gun is, and a few of them didn’t even do that so well.

The guys I am talking about now are some of the same guys who used to not even carry off duty on a regular basis- but not anymore. They don’t scare easily, defenders of the Constitution of this State and the United States (as our oath of office reads), have been buying ARs, survival gear, and all the ammo they can lay their hands on. All of them (or I should say “us”) have been discussing and have been acquiring guns to provide a layered perimeter defense.

What are we suddenly so afraid of? Well in our discussions it seems to boil down to four areas.

First, fear of federal government intrusion into our lives. Every time I look at or listen to the news, there is something new and intrusive coming out of the Obama administration and this Congress. New tax schemes, government-run Canadian-style healthcare, a volunteer citizen defense force (whatever that is, what happened to the National Guard?) equipped with funding similar to our military, forced voluntary “service” after retirement, a lack of a southern border with hordes of illegal and criminal aliens pouring over our border, the swine flu scare as well as government forced closing of thousands of privately held Chrysler and GM dealerships, which will be the final nail in the coffin for these companies and the list goes on and on.

But these items in the news are just the tip of the iceberg. We can’t see the full impact of these actions yet, but we don’t know what was added into the thousand of pages of stimulus package bills in the dead of night yet. I predict however that when the plans contained in the stimulus packages go into effect, a lot of us are going to be surprised if not shocked by what has suddenly and sweepingly changed.

What also scares us is the second, well-founded fear that there is an assault weapons ban looming, one that would make the Clinton Ban appear like a look of disdain in comparison. I remember well the 1990s and the Clinton years: the rise of militia groups, the “black helicopter” rumors and paranoia, all of which was motivated by the Brady Law and the Assault Weapon’s ban. What if a new ban comes requiring registration or confiscation and turn-in of banned weapons as what happened in Australia?

…I foresee much civil disobedience coming down the road. Americans are citizens, and not subjects like the British, Canadians or Australians. They just don’t always obey the law blindly and not one officer or citizen that I spoke to said anything like “I hope I get to keep this gun for awhile before they are banned; They are fun to shoot, so I would hate to give it up.” It isn’t going to happen, so the cop on the street and the soldier on the base needs to think now what he will do if the orders come down. I think you all get what I am saying here.

Which leads me to the third fear, that there is a revolution coming, yes, a revolution on the scale of the original American Revolution. You can hear this topic discussed on many of the talk radio shows by even the big name hosts. The possib ility of an armed revolution against the U.S. government being discussed, albeit very gingerly and fleetingly and as something to be avoided, which it is. I never heard this mentioned in the 90s. One of my quietest, low profile officer friends brought it up the other day.

He said that at some point in the near future, he felt there is going to be an armed revolt if things keep going the way they are. Something has got to give. I was shocked. Yes, I had heard this from some of my more radical cop friends in the past, but to hear it from a guy like this was unprecedented. Now, these guys are not saying this will happen to foment revolution, preach sedition or to even participate. They just want to be ready if it happens, to at least defend their families, because number four on the fear list is general societal chaos.

Cops fear for their parents, wives, children or grandchildren more now than ever before. Most cops are encouraging their spouses and loved ones to get concealed carry permits. Not only that, but some of these same cops are buying gun mounts for their personal cars so they can carry an AR in the family ride at the ready all the time. They are also strapping on heavier forms of off-duty hardware. I have other friends that are issued ARs or subguns for tactical team use, who always have their gear with them and are planning on just commandeering these weapons for personal use in defending hearth and home.

Final Notes

This is pretty heady and maybe even dangerous stuff. Know fully that I am not advocating anything here. I am reflecting to you what I see and hear going on around me, and maybe saying things that haven’t been said in the open, until now. It is something to think about.

%d bloggers like this: