Posts Tagged ‘tax’

Why the government wants to control your paycheck – an attack on the Sovereign movement

September 23, 2010

This week in the UK a proposal is being discussed by the Inland Revenue to take away control of your weekly or monthly pay from your employers and put it into their hands. The idea is that your employer will make deductions for union fees and pensions and the like, and then the money is paid to the Revenue who will deduct everyone’s tax as they see fit. Finally the Revenue will then pay the balance into your bank account. It is in a consultation period at the moment which ends today, after which they will be making revised proposals to the government to introduce legislation.

Most people would balk at the idea of the government coming anywhere near their private income but the BBC have been selling the story as if it is a fabulous idea that nobody should have any problems with. The way they will spin the idea is that it will save money for companies in accounting and will eliminate the duplication of work between accounts departments in companies and the revenue and the eventual balancing act that occurs. Perhaps there might be a saving overall, there is logic in that, but this is not why they want their hands in your pockets.

That is the question they will not push on the BBC, i.e. why exactly do the government want so desperately to take control of your money and to have access to your bank accounts? This seems quite openly now to be the next big step in the steady construction of the Big Brother state. A state that already sports CCTV cameras everywhere, even in homes, spying on your telecoms and emails, and a campaign of “report on your neighbours” that is disintegrating society.

David Cameron and Nick Clegg campaigned in the election to deconstruct this surveillance system that they blamed the Labour government for constructing, yet, as with every administration in the so called free world, they seem to be doing the complete reverse of what they promised before they were elected and are building upon what has been left to them.

What is the motivation for this though and why now? Well in this writers opinion what we are seeing here is a massive gamble by the government in reaction to the growing understanding amongst the awakened members of the public to the corruption of the system. To be more specific, there has been a huge awakening over the last two or three years to the fact that government is not in fact representing the men and women in the country, but is working for a corporate elite and managing a system of law that is solely commercial in nature.

The Common Law we thought we were living under has been replaced by Commercial or Admiralty Law of the Sea, and is implemented through Statutes and Acts that have no jurisdiction over flesh and blood men and women or above Common Law. These statutes and acts are all contracts and can therefore only be acted upon us with our consent. this is the great fraud.

Remember, if you look in the companies register you will find that the government is now a corporation, as well as every court, police force, council, utility, and even schools,  prisons and all government departments including Revenue.. All operating for profit and generating revenue. Hence the massive increase in legislation with monetary value attached to be extracted from us.

People who have discovered this and have researched remedies to it, have discovered how to beat the system. They have discovered that they can choose weather to operate in the public domain, using their legal fiction corporate entity, i.e. their NAME (all caps), which is registered to the government by your birth certificate and is owned by them and so can be acted upon by them, as it appears on any correspondence with government or utilities etc; or, alternatively people can choose not to use it but to operate in the private as themselves. In doing this they are not contracting commercially with the government system and therefore cannot be acted upon by the system.

How are these two linked? Well by not contracting with the system, people are able to avoid paying fines, taxes, bills etc issued by councils, utilities, courts, police, and revenue. Clearly the information has been spreading far and wide and is becoming a major worry that the scam might be realised by more and more people very quickly, and has forced the government into this kind of knee jerk reaction.

So by taking away control of your pay, the government will give themselves the power to deduct any amount of tax it deems correct. It may also raise tax at will without any possibility of taxation revolt. Furthermore they will have the ability to deduct from your pay any amount from any fines, council charges, court orders, debts, etc before you ever see your money in your account. All of the statutes, that are unenforceable on men and women without their consent, will be monetarily enforced before we even have the chance to lawfully do anything about it

This is how they are going to destroy the sovereign freeman movement which has discovered the corporate corruption that is masquerading as government in western nations. This will become a cashless society where everyone is a state employee in effect and you are dependent upon the state for money. Anyone who steps out of line or harbours opinions that differ from that of the state can then have their lives made very difficult indeed.

This is something that our elders fought against, that even our own crazies in our governments tell us was a terrible evil system when it was operated by Hitler or Stalin or Mau or in any other historical dictatorship. Yet here they are implementing it themselves in a new and improved version that is right out of Orwell’s 1984.

This is not going to be isolated to the UK. They are simply a testing ground to see how easily it can be implemented. Make no mistake, all other countries will follow suit, especially in Europe. Undoubtedly Ireland will be the first to fall in line as usual as they are still in reality under Crown (City of London) rule.

This will force an even bigger sea change in the minds of the people who already understand the fake reality of the system we live in. It will force them to make UK irrelevant. To leave the Corporate UK lawfully and exist as a private man or woman on the land, as many already have. It will mean groups will arise who no longer recognise the jurisdiction of the government over the land and this is going to lead to major conflict with the corporate police state that is being built.

As has happened before during depressions down the centuries, groups or regions are going to start issuing their own money and barter so as to avoid joining the UK Corporate system. This has already started happening in some places as a way of keeping the money in a town or village by issuing town money to trade in local outlets only. This is happening worldwide now as the system starts to crumble.

The black market is going to grow exponentially and the number of people renouncing UK citizenship will likewise increase. This will accelerate the system towards failure. So communities need to get together now and plan for their removal from the overreaching and interference of the Corporate government. By doing this they will hasten the system’s demise and be better placed to prosper when it does.

In a way this kind of outlandish legislative intrusion into our private lives by big government who promised to reverse this trend will only serve to wake up millions more people to the lies as the veneer falls from the tyranny of a government owned by and run for the benefit of an elite group of banking families.

.

Advertisements

Data shows world is cooling fast, yet warming hoax juggernaut rolls on

November 2, 2009

sn0w-dees

Below is an article, (reprinted for educational reason) by Dr Tim Ball on the current trend in global temperatures based on REAL data. It seem that the overwhelming ACTUAL data related to climate change as we now call it is proving only one thing. That the planet is is mortal danger of cooling down at a very rapid rate. The data collected since Al Gore’s error ridden film An Inconvenient Truth has shown the opposite to all the predictions he and the IPCC have made.

So with the science clearly disproving the theory of the IPCC, the question remains, why are they ignoring the data and pressing on with their agenda based on a lie? (comment after article)

Current Global Temperatures Impossible According to IPCC ‘Science’.

By Dr. Tim Ball Monday, November 2, 2009

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon says, “Unless we fight climate change, unless we stop this trend, we’ll have devastating consequences for humanity.”

Other leaders make similar silly statements. Obama claims the “threat from climate change is serious, it is urgent, and it is growing.”

But which way is it growing? Which trend are they going to stop? The one predicted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) or the one Mother Nature is providing? They’ve chosen the IPCC even though all their predictions (scenarios) are wrong. But it is worse. Global temperatures of the last few years are impossible according to the ‘science’ of the (IPCC).

What’s Actually Happening?

Temperatures were predicted to increase but are declining (Figure 1). Even their lowest scenario says the world should be at least 0.3¬∞C warmer. Doesn’t sound like much but it equals half the warming they claim occurred in the preceding 130 years.

ball110209-1

Figure 1: Global average temperature 2002 to 2009 and IPCC scenarios.

As physicist David Douglass said, “If the facts are contrary to any predictions, then the hypothesis is wrong no matter how appealing.”

Facts Contradict Hypothesis

Many people pointed to facts contradicting the “appealing” hypothesis but were ignored or marginalized for several reasons. These included; apparent support from rising global temperatures between 1980 and 1998; evidence too technical for most people; effective personal attacks on skeptics; Gore’s slick propaganda movie An Inconvenient Truth despite 35 scientific errors; and the mainstream media was ignorant of the science and biased.

A plethora of evidence has not brought the hypothesis down. For example,

The Medieval Warm Period 1000 years ago was warmer than today.

The Holocene Optimum from 3000 to 8000 years ago was warmer than today.

The last three Interglacial periods were warmer than the current one.

The claim of 0.6 degrees C rise during industrial times was unverifiable because the scientist refused to disclose the evidence and then the government ‘lost’ the data.

Four of the warmest years on record in the US were in the 1930s not the 1990s as claimed.

1934 was the warmest in the US not 1998 as claimed.

The Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS) adjusted historic data down to make the modern record relatively warmer.

Temperature increases before CO2 in all records.

CO2 levels currently at 388 ppm are the lowest in 300 million years.

There’s a limit of at most 1.4 degrees C to the amount of temperature can increase even if CO2 doubles or triples.

In the 20th century human production of CO2 didn’t fit the temperature record. From 1900 to 1940 human CO2 production levels were low but temperatures increased the most. From 1940 to 1980 human production levels increased the most but temperature declined.

The models predicted the atmosphere would warm faster than the surface but the opposite is happening.

These are more than enough facts to show the hypothesis is wrong. Polls indicate the public is learning, but AGW proponents and politicians are not and continue to push their political agendas.

Nature Not Playing By The Rules

Now they face facts everyone can grasp. The Earth is cooling with record low temperatures everywhere, a contradiction with the IPCC hypothesis anyone can grasp without scientific understanding. Figure 2 shows 1998 was an unusually warm year attributed to El Nino. 1999 was cooler and AGW proponents correctly said the drop from 1998 was not evidence of a trend.

ball110209-2

Figure 2: Global temperatures 1985 to 2009 and atmospheric CO2 levels.

Temperatures increased slightly again in 2000 (Figure 2) seeming to support the AGW contention. However, since 2002 temperatures declined gradually, making a trend that began in the Southern Hemisphere 10 years earlier global. AGW proponents are now trying to prove the trend doesn’t exist.

They play statistical games by pre-determining the trend by the starting point chosen. Choosing 2002 as a starting point appears to play the same game, however, there’s a major difference. The decline can’t happen according to the IPCC hypothesis. Their report says, “Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic GHG concentrations.”

“Very likely” is defined as greater than 90 percent likelihood.

They reinforce the point; “During the past 50 years, the sum of solar and volcanic forcings would likely have produced cooling. Observed patterns of warming and their changes are simulated only by models that include anthropogenic forcings.” But according to their Reports CO2 levels have continued to increase due to human additions. “Global GHG emissions due to human activities have grown since pre-industrial times, with an increase of 70% between 1970 and 2004.”

The second statement is also false because they don’t include two of the three known mechanisms of solar causes of temperature change in their models. They did acknowledge, “Difficulties remain in simulating and attributing observed temperature changes at smaller than continental scales” They must say this because they report, “It is likely that there has been significant anthropogenic warming over the past 50 years averaged over each continent (except Antarctica).” If CO2 was causing temperature increase it should be global. So what is happening cannot happen. The hypothesis and the models built on it are wrong. Temperature declining while CO2 increased did force one change; they switched focus from global warming to climate change.

Climate Change: What Happens When Nature Disobeys Government.

Political leaders say they are going to stop climate change. It is an arrogant, ignorant claim adopted because they accepted IPCC claims and then chose to ignore scientific evidence showing they were wrong. Now they’re ignoring nature, which doesn’t listen as the evidence shows. As Douglass says, “One finds the truth by making a hypothesis and comparing observations with the hypothesis.” The observations don’t support the hypothesis but that doesn’t matter because it fits the political objective. British MP Jeremy Thorpe said “Greater love hath no man than this, that he lay down his friends for his political life.” Our leaders are laying the people down for their political lives. Sadly none of them will ever be held accountable, but the people will pay the price.

(2) Reader Feedback | Subscribe

Dr. Tim Ball Most recent columns

Copyright © 2009 CFP

“Dr. Tim Ball is a renowned environmental consultant and former climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg. Dr. Ball employs his extensive background in climatology and other fields as an advisor to the International Climate Science Coalition, Friends of Science and the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.”

Dr. Ball can be reached at: Letters@canadafreepress.com

Original article in Canada Free Press

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/16460

For the answer we must look at who stands to gain from this plan to implement the “cure” for this non existent problem.

The “cure”, apparently, is multi-faceted and includes plans to monitor and tax every carbon creating activity known to man. Also there is a plan to create a carbon credit trade to allow developing countries to sell offsets to developed ones. There doesn’t however seem to be any attempt to cut any of the carbon these people are still blaming for the now non existent problem. With no limits being put on developing countries and developed ones being able to buy offsets to allow them to continue to produce carbon, then what exactly will the carbon trade achieve?

This is where you find out who gains. The Carbon credit trade will be run by the very man who is pushing the lie, Al Gore. His company will make billions in trade fees from trading these carbon credits. This is Gore’s pay off for pushing the agenda that will establish a carbon tax that will be paid to the UN run Environmental Government that is about to be created in Copenhagen in December. This carbon tax is the funding the World Government requires to further it’s aims to become a full World Government of the New World Order.

The aspect of this “cure” that is uppermost in the aims of the people behind it is the control and tracking aspect of carbon taxing. In order to be taxed, you must be monitored and controlled. The result of monitoring is that your every move, whereabouts and activity will be known to the governments. Total control means the powers that control you can never be removed.

It is very simple when you look at the reality behind pushing the lie against all evidence to the contrary. So please realise that nothing these people do happens for your benefit, as you will be the ones paying. Everything they do is for a reason they do not divulge to us, but when you look at the evidence it is so obvious.


%d bloggers like this: