Archive for the ‘Climate change’ Category

Are the military’s scientists playing God with our planet ?

April 19, 2010

This is a question on many people’s minds these days. There have been ever increasing revelations of secret military projects past and present, ranging from mind control to biological testing on the public, which have remained largely buried until recently. The speed and access to information afforded by the internet has now combined with good old fashioned detective work using freedom of information requests and trawling through declassified documents, and has enabled researchers to piece together the true history and nature of some of these projects. One of the most current and infamous of these projects is HAARP.

HAARP stands for High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program and is a US military facility in Gakona, south eastern Alaska. It is run jointly by the US Navy and Air Force and the main focal point of the facility is a field of linked antennae which together can direct massive amounts of energy, in the form of high frequency electro-magnetic radiation, into the upper atmosphere.


Officially the facility is for research into the ionosphere which is a highly charged layer of the earth’s upper atmosphere that protects us from the sun’s radiation. When questioned about what they are doing there we are told that it is used to re-create the effects of the sun and can also simulate the northern lights. No other definitive uses are admitted to, so why would the military be interested in painting colours in the sky?

Well, if we go back through the history we will find out. This technology was patented in 1987 by Bernard Eastlund (US patent 4,686,605) and was designed to the backdrop of the cold war and Ronald Reagan’s space based “star wars” missile defence hoax. What Eastlund’s purely security minded motives had led him to invent was a ground based defence shield. His list of uses for his invention include disruption of land or satellite based communications including radar to affect enemy aircraft or missiles; destroying planes or missiles; deflecting missiles by lifting the ionosphere hundreds of miles out into space.

These all seem like reasonable goals for a futuristic defence system. So why is this of any concern? Well, because the nature of this system allows it to travel along the natural magnetic field lines of the earth, Eastlund expresses the potential of this system to affect not only the local area but much farther afield. Long time HAARP researcher Dr Nick Begich believes that it has the potential to shut down all other communication systems around the world, excepting their own, by flooding large ares with electromagnetic waves. A weapon this powerful in any nation’s hands is a worrying development, and especially in the hands of a country that might be building an empire.

Now we are all aware of how the military will take any and every new technology for peace and turn it into a weapon of war. Look at the humble microwave, used for ovens and telecommunications, yet it has recently been turned into a microwave canon that can burn the skin of protestors when fired at by police. So using this invention for offensive measures is a perfectly reasonable assumption. Remember also that this technology was designed in the early 1980s when computers were only first marketed, so imagine how much further the technology will have advanced if it paralleled the IT industry’s advances. With this in mind there are now plenty of educated observers who are rightly questioning HAARP on a number of sinister possibilities. Indeed there are many follow on patents held by military contractor Raytheon, who now run HAARP research for the military, that Dr Begich explains detail the weaponised uses of the antennae array.


The original patent declared it to be capable of weather manipulation. Indeed if you heat a portion of the ionosphere and lift it hundreds of miles into space it stands to reason that the air from below and beside the rising mass will rush in to fill the void. This will cause dramatic changes to the high atmospheric wind patterns. Eastlund also describes how to carry particles into the magnetosphere to either deflect or absorb more sunlight.

It should be noted that HAARP is not the only facility of it’s type in the world. The US will only admit to running three currently, but other estimates have put the worldwide number as high as 76 facilities owned by many different countries. Indeed there has always been paranoia in the US that the Russians were using scalar wave technology to wage weather wars on them. They have had an Office of Weather Modification in the Whitehouse since 1952. This technology was and is very real and was so worrying that the UN drafted a resolution in 1974 that limited weather modification to ones own borders and banned it’s use as a weapon. With all this going on for the last few decades and this technology being used worldwide plus decades of aerosol spraying, it does bring into question the motives of governments claiming climate change.


One of Eastlund’s other clams was that the system can be used to bounce back extra low frequency waves (ELF) to earth to communicate below ground, with submarines for instance. The estimates of the power now being shot up into the atmosphere from HAARP are in the billions of Watts, so when you consider that it only takes a mere 30 Watts of power using ELF to vibrate the earth enough to locate oil, coal and gas then you can understand why many scientists are wondering what a billion Watts would do when aimed at a fault in the earth and vibrating at the correct frequency. So have the US really perfected the earthquake machine?

This can only be speculated of course but we can look for unanswered questioned, like why was the HAARP usage data for the day before the Haiti earthquake erased, and why was there a US “excercise” for tsunami relief to Haiti running at the exact same time? Coincidental ? Perhaps, but these “exercises” coincidences have happened too many times now. Further the incidences of earthquakes have shown a marked jump since this facility went fully online and there have been a number of surprising events like Haiti, the Asian tsunami and even last weeks Icelandic volcano that have happened without any significant seismic activity preceding them and have scientists asking questions.. Whether this is due to a directed ELF wave or because the earth is reacting to the damage being done to it’s finely balanced natural power grid, the questions need to be answered.

The belief in this weapon exists at the highest levels as demonstrated by the Chinese accusing the US of causing the 2008 Sichuan earthquake based on scientific information given to them by Russia. With this in mind it should be noted that Eastlund referenced and expanded upon the work of Nicola Tesla for his invention. Tesla was the pioneer of the rediscovery and use of the earths natural energy fields, and before the end of WW2 he claimed to have invented what he termed the “death ray”. On Tesla’s death all his research immediately “disappeared”, no doubt into the Pentagon.


Eastlund also proved that HAARP could piggyback a second signal and direct it to a target for communication purposes. However this fact also means that the potential for mass mind or mood manipulation is very real. The resonating frequencies of the human mind are well known as are the frequencies it takes to induce feelings like anxiety, lethargy, lack of sleep or even euphoria. The only problem has been devising a system to disperse the signals on a large scale. This problem may well have been solved. The uses of this kind of technology are frightening as they could be used in everything from war to elections on a mass scale.

This is all well known to those in power. For instance these entries taken from a book by Zbignew Brzezinski, head of the Rand Corporation, the national security advisor to President Carter and election advisor to Barack Obama, written over 25 years ago reads:- “Political strategists are tempted to exploit research on the brain and human behavior. Geophysicist Gordon J.F. MacDonald, a specialist in problems of warfare, says accurately-timed, artificially-excited electronic strokes could lead to a pattern of oscillations that produce relatively high power levels over certain regions of the earth … in this way one could develop a system that would seriously impair the brain performance of very large populations in selected regions over an extended period … no matter how deeply disturbing the thought of using the environment to manipulate behavior for national advantages, to some, the technology permitting such use will very probably develop within the next few decades.”

Well, that technology was being used on a small scale in the 1960s in Moscow on an unsuspecting US embassy so you can guarantee the world has been perfecting it during the following fifty years. So real is the possibility that a Bill was introduced into the US Congress in 2001 (HR 2977) called The Space Preservation Act. It was to reaffirm the non-militarisation of space and the upper atmosphere including provisions for HAARP and it’s potentials as a weapon. However the Bill went no further after receiving “unfavourable executive comment” from the Department of Defense.


When the military takes control of a science they are only interested in it’s military uses, none of which are good for us or the planet. They have been zapping our atmosphere for the last 60 years and now that HAARP has been operating since the 1990s we have seen what can only be described as a fever descend on the earth.

The planet operates a very intricate and sensitive system, almost like a single living organism. It’s atmosphere is made up of many different concentric layers interlaced with a veritable spiders web of magnetic force lines, planetary power grids and a vast range of creatures and ecosystems that rely on these being in balance. A facility like HAARP is cutting through those grids and sending disruptive signals through those power lines. It is not then surprising that the earth seems to be letting off a lot of steam to try to redress the balance of what we could call the mental abuse they are inflicting on the planet with facilities like HAARP

One of the clearest indicators of these effects is the animal life. We have seen birds, fish and other creatures suffering problems with migration due to changes in the electromagnetic fields of the earth. We are also seeing in the last 15 years the disappearance of the bees who are extremely sensitive to electro-magnetic fields. Without bees we will starve within five years, yet no effort seems to have been made to correlate this with experiments of this sort.

What they are doing to the atmosphere is fraught with unknowns that may or may not have catastrophic results when they next crank up the HAARP beam for the biggest energy boost yet. This atmosphere belongs to all of us. Whatever they do affects us all. It should not be theirs to experiment on or risk destroying. It is time the people started taking responsibility and asking questions about these questionable experiments, even if only to eliminate them from suspicion. However, once something like this gets into military hands, then very little good ever comes of it.

Data shows world is cooling fast, yet warming hoax juggernaut rolls on

November 2, 2009


Below is an article, (reprinted for educational reason) by Dr Tim Ball on the current trend in global temperatures based on REAL data. It seem that the overwhelming ACTUAL data related to climate change as we now call it is proving only one thing. That the planet is is mortal danger of cooling down at a very rapid rate. The data collected since Al Gore’s error ridden film An Inconvenient Truth has shown the opposite to all the predictions he and the IPCC have made.

So with the science clearly disproving the theory of the IPCC, the question remains, why are they ignoring the data and pressing on with their agenda based on a lie? (comment after article)

Current Global Temperatures Impossible According to IPCC ‘Science’.

By Dr. Tim Ball Monday, November 2, 2009

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon says, “Unless we fight climate change, unless we stop this trend, we’ll have devastating consequences for humanity.”

Other leaders make similar silly statements. Obama claims the “threat from climate change is serious, it is urgent, and it is growing.”

But which way is it growing? Which trend are they going to stop? The one predicted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) or the one Mother Nature is providing? They’ve chosen the IPCC even though all their predictions (scenarios) are wrong. But it is worse. Global temperatures of the last few years are impossible according to the ‘science’ of the (IPCC).

What’s Actually Happening?

Temperatures were predicted to increase but are declining (Figure 1). Even their lowest scenario says the world should be at least 0.3¬∞C warmer. Doesn’t sound like much but it equals half the warming they claim occurred in the preceding 130 years.


Figure 1: Global average temperature 2002 to 2009 and IPCC scenarios.

As physicist David Douglass said, “If the facts are contrary to any predictions, then the hypothesis is wrong no matter how appealing.”

Facts Contradict Hypothesis

Many people pointed to facts contradicting the “appealing” hypothesis but were ignored or marginalized for several reasons. These included; apparent support from rising global temperatures between 1980 and 1998; evidence too technical for most people; effective personal attacks on skeptics; Gore’s slick propaganda movie An Inconvenient Truth despite 35 scientific errors; and the mainstream media was ignorant of the science and biased.

A plethora of evidence has not brought the hypothesis down. For example,

The Medieval Warm Period 1000 years ago was warmer than today.

The Holocene Optimum from 3000 to 8000 years ago was warmer than today.

The last three Interglacial periods were warmer than the current one.

The claim of 0.6 degrees C rise during industrial times was unverifiable because the scientist refused to disclose the evidence and then the government ‘lost’ the data.

Four of the warmest years on record in the US were in the 1930s not the 1990s as claimed.

1934 was the warmest in the US not 1998 as claimed.

The Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS) adjusted historic data down to make the modern record relatively warmer.

Temperature increases before CO2 in all records.

CO2 levels currently at 388 ppm are the lowest in 300 million years.

There’s a limit of at most 1.4 degrees C to the amount of temperature can increase even if CO2 doubles or triples.

In the 20th century human production of CO2 didn’t fit the temperature record. From 1900 to 1940 human CO2 production levels were low but temperatures increased the most. From 1940 to 1980 human production levels increased the most but temperature declined.

The models predicted the atmosphere would warm faster than the surface but the opposite is happening.

These are more than enough facts to show the hypothesis is wrong. Polls indicate the public is learning, but AGW proponents and politicians are not and continue to push their political agendas.

Nature Not Playing By The Rules

Now they face facts everyone can grasp. The Earth is cooling with record low temperatures everywhere, a contradiction with the IPCC hypothesis anyone can grasp without scientific understanding. Figure 2 shows 1998 was an unusually warm year attributed to El Nino. 1999 was cooler and AGW proponents correctly said the drop from 1998 was not evidence of a trend.


Figure 2: Global temperatures 1985 to 2009 and atmospheric CO2 levels.

Temperatures increased slightly again in 2000 (Figure 2) seeming to support the AGW contention. However, since 2002 temperatures declined gradually, making a trend that began in the Southern Hemisphere 10 years earlier global. AGW proponents are now trying to prove the trend doesn’t exist.

They play statistical games by pre-determining the trend by the starting point chosen. Choosing 2002 as a starting point appears to play the same game, however, there’s a major difference. The decline can’t happen according to the IPCC hypothesis. Their report says, “Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic GHG concentrations.”

“Very likely” is defined as greater than 90 percent likelihood.

They reinforce the point; “During the past 50 years, the sum of solar and volcanic forcings would likely have produced cooling. Observed patterns of warming and their changes are simulated only by models that include anthropogenic forcings.” But according to their Reports CO2 levels have continued to increase due to human additions. “Global GHG emissions due to human activities have grown since pre-industrial times, with an increase of 70% between 1970 and 2004.”

The second statement is also false because they don’t include two of the three known mechanisms of solar causes of temperature change in their models. They did acknowledge, “Difficulties remain in simulating and attributing observed temperature changes at smaller than continental scales” They must say this because they report, “It is likely that there has been significant anthropogenic warming over the past 50 years averaged over each continent (except Antarctica).” If CO2 was causing temperature increase it should be global. So what is happening cannot happen. The hypothesis and the models built on it are wrong. Temperature declining while CO2 increased did force one change; they switched focus from global warming to climate change.

Climate Change: What Happens When Nature Disobeys Government.

Political leaders say they are going to stop climate change. It is an arrogant, ignorant claim adopted because they accepted IPCC claims and then chose to ignore scientific evidence showing they were wrong. Now they’re ignoring nature, which doesn’t listen as the evidence shows. As Douglass says, “One finds the truth by making a hypothesis and comparing observations with the hypothesis.” The observations don’t support the hypothesis but that doesn’t matter because it fits the political objective. British MP Jeremy Thorpe said “Greater love hath no man than this, that he lay down his friends for his political life.” Our leaders are laying the people down for their political lives. Sadly none of them will ever be held accountable, but the people will pay the price.

(2) Reader Feedback | Subscribe

Dr. Tim Ball Most recent columns

Copyright © 2009 CFP

“Dr. Tim Ball is a renowned environmental consultant and former climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg. Dr. Ball employs his extensive background in climatology and other fields as an advisor to the International Climate Science Coalition, Friends of Science and the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.”

Dr. Ball can be reached at:

Original article in Canada Free Press

For the answer we must look at who stands to gain from this plan to implement the “cure” for this non existent problem.

The “cure”, apparently, is multi-faceted and includes plans to monitor and tax every carbon creating activity known to man. Also there is a plan to create a carbon credit trade to allow developing countries to sell offsets to developed ones. There doesn’t however seem to be any attempt to cut any of the carbon these people are still blaming for the now non existent problem. With no limits being put on developing countries and developed ones being able to buy offsets to allow them to continue to produce carbon, then what exactly will the carbon trade achieve?

This is where you find out who gains. The Carbon credit trade will be run by the very man who is pushing the lie, Al Gore. His company will make billions in trade fees from trading these carbon credits. This is Gore’s pay off for pushing the agenda that will establish a carbon tax that will be paid to the UN run Environmental Government that is about to be created in Copenhagen in December. This carbon tax is the funding the World Government requires to further it’s aims to become a full World Government of the New World Order.

The aspect of this “cure” that is uppermost in the aims of the people behind it is the control and tracking aspect of carbon taxing. In order to be taxed, you must be monitored and controlled. The result of monitoring is that your every move, whereabouts and activity will be known to the governments. Total control means the powers that control you can never be removed.

It is very simple when you look at the reality behind pushing the lie against all evidence to the contrary. So please realise that nothing these people do happens for your benefit, as you will be the ones paying. Everything they do is for a reason they do not divulge to us, but when you look at the evidence it is so obvious.

%d bloggers like this: