Archive for May, 2009

Finally Mainstream media catches up with reality and truth

May 30, 2009

I can’t believe this slipped through the censor

Can anybody tell me how many viewers might have seen this show?


Finally Mainstream media catches up with reality and truth

May 30, 2009

Moves to stop civil assembly

May 29, 2009

Below is an article I would like you to quickly read which describes how a county official came to the HOME of a local pastor and told him he could not assemble a small group of people in his home for Bible study on pain of escalating fines unless he got a permit costing $10,000. Read on and my comment at the end

Home: No place for Bible study
County demands pastor spend thousands on ‘Major Use’ permit to host friends

By Drew Zahn
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

A San Diego pastor and his wife claim they were interrogated by a county official and warned they will face escalating fines if they continue to hold Bible studies in their home.

The couple, whose names are being withheld until a demand letter can be filed on their behalf, told their attorney a county government employee knocked on their door on Good Friday, asking a litany of questions about their Tuesday night Bible studies, which are attended by approximately 15 people.

“Do you have a regular weekly meeting in your home? Do you sing? Do you say ‘amen’?” the official reportedly asked. “Do you say, ‘Praise the Lord’?”

The pastor’s wife answered yes.

She says she was then told, however, that she must stop holding “religious assemblies” until she and her husband obtain a Major Use Permit from the county, a permit that often involves traffic and environmental studies, compliance with parking and sidewalk regulations and costs that top tens of thousands of dollars.

And if they fail to pay for the MUP, the county official reportedly warned, the couple will be charged escalating fines beginning at $100, then $200, $500, $1000, “and then it will get ugly.”

Dean Broyles of the Western Center for Law & Policy, which has been retained to represent the couple, told WND the county’s action not only violates religious land-use laws but also assaults both the First Amendment’s freedom of assembly and freedom of religion.

“The First Amendment, in part, reads, ‘Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,'” Broyles said. “And that’s the key part: ‘prohibiting the free exercise.’ We believe this is a substantial government burden on the free exercise of religion.”

He continued, “If one’s home is one’s castle, certainly you would the think the free exercise of religion, of all places, could occur in the home.”

Broyles confirmed the county official followed through on his threat. The pastor and his wife received a written warning ordering the couple to “cease/stop religious assembly on parcel or obtain a major use permit.”

“The Western Center for Law and Policy is troubled by this draconian move to suppress home Bible studies,” said the law center in a statement. “If the current trends in our nation continue, churches may be forced underground. If that happens, believers will once again be forced to meet in homes. If homes are already closed by the government to assembly and worship, where then will Christians meet?”

On a personal note, Broyles added, “I’ve been leading Bible studies in my home for 13 years in San Diego County, and I personally believe that home fellowship Bible studies are the past and future of the church. … If you look at China, the church grew from home Bible studies. I’m deeply concerned that if in the U.S. we are not able to meet in our homes and freely practice our religion, then we may be worse off than China.”

Broyles also explained to WND that oppressive governments, such as communist China or Nazi Germany, worked to repress home fellowships, labeling them the “underground church” or “subversive groups,” legally compelling Christians to meet only in sanctioned, government-controlled “official” churches.

“Therein lies my concern,” Broyles said. “If people can’t practice their religious beliefs in the privacy of their own homes with a few of their friends, that’s an egregious First Amendment violation.”

WND contacted a spokeswoman for San Diego County, who acknowledged the description of the incident seemed “bizarre,” but who was unable to locate the details of the account. She simply could not provide comment yet, she said, until she could become familiar with the case.

Broyles said the WCLP is nearly ready to file a demand letter with the county to release the pastor and his wife from the requirement to obtain the expensive permit. If the county refuses, Broyles said, the WCLP will consider a lawsuit in federal court.

Broyles also told WND the pastor and his wife are continuing to hold the Bible study in their home.


What we are seeing here is yet another small step in the ever increasing war against YOU from the authority. They want your total submission and to do this they are slowly turning up the heat. Yesterday we had police choking and trying to arrest ambulance drivers while they tried to tend to a very ill woman in the van. The day before we had a policeman put an inocent young man in a coma slamming him into a wall because he didn’t respond to him. Now today we hear officialdom wants you to bow down and submit when they tell you you cannot have a gathering in your own home or face increasing fines

This is all part of a constant barrage on your psyche teaching you to OBEY AUTHORITY, not to question however crazy they become or however ridiculous the laws are getting. The hostility with which these things are happenning is increasing too, as well as the number of things they demand your obedience too.

Some might say that this is a one off and it was pronbably the neighbour complaining that the cars were blocking up the road every Wednesday. However this is their OWN HOME and the authority should have NO BUSINESS in your home. This is not a one off. If the law exists it will be used. Then what will you do when you want to have a party in yuor home, pay ten thousand to the county? What about a family get together? What about any kind of club you might hold or regular meeting of friends? This is only the first step towards putting people in fear of associating with groups even in their own home.

When a government is becoming illegal or acting illegally or against the interests of the people they become paranoid of being discovered and afraid of the people they are betraying. When this happens they begin to try to censor the media and free speech, and curtail freedom to associate so that ideas cannot be discussed. It is the madness of a dictator that always happens when the dictator finally achieves power through the stealthy means you see going on now. He will eventually fear that everybody is trying to depose him and he will kill those people closest to him who brought him to the top because he knows they have the ability to do again what they did with him. Now his supporters have become the biggest threat. This is the madness we are now seeing growing in government. They fear the people and will do anything to supress discussion. Hitler did this. Stalin did this.

They also d
id this….. Soon you will have a million strong private youth brigade running around in uniforms looking over your fence, in your bin, listening to the way you speak about the government or the way you handle your kids and they have the hotline to the local gestapo…. er…… police, CSA, etc. Parents and family members afraid of what their own children might say to someone that might get them a bang on the front door.

There are 90 year old people in Germany who are scratching their heads and saying why? Why can’t the British and Americans see that what is happenning in their countries is exactly what happened in Germany in the 1930s? They cannot believe it is happenning again and that we have all forgotten

Already you have to get permits to protest, and Britain has laws banning people gathering in groups more than a certain number. They are even preventing your children from making physical contact at school now. It is mind control for slaves and it has gone too far

America and Britain are now in the top 6 of the most repressive governments and societies in the world according to a recent international survey. America has more people in jail per capita than any other country in the world. What are you going to do to stop it because it doesn’t seem to matter which of the mainstream parties you vote for it only stays the same or worse?

Well where did you think they got them from?

May 28, 2009

Today South Korea threatened to stop and search North Korean ships under direction of the US Navy so (naturally) North Korea ended the Armistice between North and South and issued a statement saying any attempt to impede their vessels will be seen as an act of war and would be swiftly responded to. This brings to an end a 50 year ceasefire (that neither side actually signed) and puts them back at war in effect.

The recent bomb tests in North Korea have been hyped out of context too. The report was that they had tested a 50 megaton bomb when really it was only a 1 megaton bomb. the media have deliberately hyped it to make it sound as though they have the capability to attack anyone of any stature. the second test was similarly hyped.

Now if you had done some background reading into the long term intentions of the Military industrial complex agenda you would realise as I do that this is all starting to fit neatly into a planned conflict drawn up some time ago by strategists of the Anglo-American Geo-political Empire and if you dig deeper still you can see how it was done. Here is an example of how nuclear knowledge is covertly moved around the world to create the next enemy.

How George Bush Gave Krazy Kim The Bomb

Greg Palast
Wednesday, May 27, 2009

How did a berserker like North Korea’s Kim Jong Il get the bomb in the first place? Answer: He bought it from the Dr. Strangelove of Pakistan in 2001 — while all our President’s men ordered our intelligence agents to keep their eyes shut tight.

On November 9, 2001, BBC Television Centre in London received a call from a phone booth just outside Washington. The call to our Newsnight team was part of a complex prearranged dance coordinated with the National Security News Service, a conduit for unhappy spooks at the CIA and FBI to unburden themselves of disturbing information and documents. The top-level U.S. intelligence agent on the line had much to be unhappy and disturbed about: a “back-off” directive.

This call to BBC came two months after the attack on the Pentagon and World Trade Towers. His fellow agents, he said, were now released to hunt bad guys. That was good news. The bad news was that, before September 11, in those weeks just after George W. Bush took office, CIA and Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) personnel were told to “back off” certain targets of investigations begun by Bill Clinton. He said there were particular investigations that were effectively killed.

Which particular investigations? The agent was willing to risk his job to get this story out, but we had to press repeatedly for specifics on the directive to “back off.” The order, he said reluctantly, spiked at least one fateful operation. As he talked, I wrote in my notebook, “Killed off Conn. Labs investigation.” Connecticut Laboratories? I was clueless until my producer Meirion Jones, a weapons expert, gave me that “you idiot” look and said, “Khan Labs! Pakistan. The bomb.” Dr. A. Q. Khan is known as the “Father” of Pakistan’s atomic bomb.

He’s not, however, the ideal parent. To raise the cash for Pakistan’s program (and to pocket a tidy sum for himself), Khan sold off copies of his baby, his bomb, to Libya and North Korea—blueprints, material and all the fixings to blow this planet to Kingdom Come.

From another source inside the lab itself, we learned that Dr. Khan was persuading Pakistan to test his bomb—on India.

Why would Team Bush pull back our agents from nabbing North Korea’s bomb connection? The answer in two words: Saudi Arabia.

The agent on the line said, “There were always constraints on investigating the Saudis.” Khan is Pakistani, not Saudi, but, nevertheless, the investigation led back to Saudi Arabia. There was no way that the Dr. Strangelove of Pakistan could have found the billions to cook up his nukes within the budget of his poor nation.

We eventually discovered that agents knew the Saudis, who had secretly funded Saddam’s nuclear weapons ambitions in the eighties, apparently moved their bomb-for-Islam money from Iraq to Dr. Khan’s lab in Pakistan after Saddam invaded Kuwait in 1990.

But, said the insider, our agents had to let a hot trail grow cold because he and others “were told to back off the Saudis.” If you can’t follow the money, you can’t investigate. The weapons hunt was spiked.

BBC got the call about Dr. Khan’s bomb in November 2001 and reported it that night on the tube and in the London Guardian. Over two years later, on February 11, 2004, President Bush, at an emergency press briefing, expressed his shock—shock!—at having learned that Dr. A. Q. Khan of Pakistan was running a flea market in fissionable material.

Our report on Dr. Khan’s nuclear bazaar was confirmed in 2004, not by U.S. intelligence, but by one of Khan’s customers, Muammar Gaddafi, the mischievous tyrant of Libya. It was Gaddafi’s last little bit of fun with Mr. Bush and Britain’s Prime Minister, Tony Blair. The U.S. and Britain had agreed to end their trade embargo on Libya in return
for Gaddafi’s shutting down his bomb program and, not incidentally, Gaddafi’s giving an exclusive oil drilling agreement to British Petroleum.

So with Libya giving up Dr. Khan’s bomb, it appeared we had a happy ending for the safety of the planet. Unfortunately, while our President was holding hands with Saudi King Abdullah at the Crawford Ranch and kissing Pakistan’s dictator Pervez Musharraf on both cheeks, Khan had given the secret of the bomb, hardware included, to
Kim of North Korea, a despot in a leisure suit a little less stable than Charles Manson.

Blow Back

The U.S. government missed discovering Dr. Khan’s radioactive fire sale because our agents were hard at work ignoring the Saudi money trail. If the agencies had not been told to “back off” the Saudis and Dr. Khan, would the U.S. have uncovered the nuclear shipments in time to stop them? We can’t possibly know, but, to paraphrase Yogi Berra, it’s amazing what you don’t see when you’re told not to look.

Now, in 2006, comes what the spook-world calls, “blow-back,” the ugly consequences of playing hide-and-don’t-seek with the Saudis five years ago. Kim has finally decided to unwrap his gift from Pakistan — and our President is, once again, in that toxic mood we all know so well: both befuddled and belligerent.

Well, I suppose George can do what he usually does in a crisis: offer Kim a big fat tax cut.

Story originally published October 2006.


You see back in late 2001 there was a very good reason to stop the investigation into the Bush’s business partners in Saudi Arabia considering that was where the all roads from 911 led to, as well as the arms smuggling funding, from both the money and the CIA incolvement in bringing people into America via Jedda

The CIA also had been protecting Khan for decades. The Dutch had opportunities to ar
rest him in 1975 and 1983 but were told not to touch him by the CIA. So the movement of nuclear blueprints, parts and equipment and other major illegal arms movements could continue unhindered. Khan admitted in 2004 to being the head of the worlds largest arms smuggling organisation

I would tell you that this large scale conflict in that region of the world has been planned for some time as I have mentioned before. You may not be aware but the Rand Corporation, which is run by the long time and current adviser to this and many previous US administrations Zbignew Brzezinski, petitioned the Pentagon for a war in this particular region on the back of the report they released which stated that the American economy needed a much bigger war than the current Middle East conflicts to recover. Something more atune to World War 3 into which they could drag China, Japan and Russia, hence North Korea. remember Taiwan was toyed with a few years ago but the Chinese didn’t bite.

You may also be interested to know that there are other components required to make a nuclear bomb and some of them were supplied in 2000 by a company called ABB of which Donald Rumsfelt was a CEO and lobbied for the lightwater reactors to be supplied to North Korea, which are used to produce weapons grade plutonium

Are you starting to see the pattern developing yet?

North Korea is historically supported by Russia and China, however those governments are in consultation with South Korea to diffuse the situation. They may well be prepared to sacrifice North Korea this time should it come to it. I doubt it ever will though because war will be fought for prolongued profit, not for gain or winning. If you study the Korean war in the 1950s you will discover that the US never intended winning that war. It was fought for money and the military was deliberately prevented from winning by it’s own backers. All manouvers were being fed through the UN and filtered back to the North Koreans via China or Russia to minimise damage and prolongate the war. See this article

Remember too that America has 28,500 troops in South Korea and has had many more over the last 50 years. that to me would predicate a bit of a local arms race if I had that on my doorstep. It should also be remembered that in 2002 after GW Bush had added North Korea to the so called “Axis of Evil” he still sent them $95 million that year and more the next year

Is this all becoming much clearer to you all now?

War I am afraid is just a racket, a game the elites play. They gain wealth, we lose lives.

If you wanted proof of that then a message from Major General Smedley Butler, probably one of Americas greatest ever heros, twice medal of honour winner and the man who prevented the attempted fascist military coup in the USA in 1933 orchestrated by the very bankers who are destroying the world economy by design now.

An exerpt from his speech in 1933 reads

Excerpt from a speech delivered in 1933, by Major General Smedley Butler, USMC.

War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of people. Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the masses.

I believe in adequate defense at the coastline and nothing else. If a nation comes over here to fight, then we’ll fight. The trouble with America is that when the dollar only earns 6 percent over here, then it gets restless and goes overseas to get 100 percent. Then the flag follows the dollar and the soldiers follow the flag.

I wouldn’t go to war again as I have done to protect some lousy investment of the bankers. There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket.

There isn’t a trick in the racketeering bag that the military gang is blind to. It has its “finger men” to point out enemies, its “muscle men” to destroy enemies, its “brain men” to plan war preparations, and a “Big Boss” Super-Nationalistic-Capitalism.

It may seem odd for me, a military man to adopt such a comparison. Truthfulness compels me to. I spent thirty- three years and four months in active military service as a member of this country’s most agile military force, the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from Second Lieutenant to Major-General. And during that period, I spent most of my time being a high class muscle- man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the Bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.

I suspected I was just part of a racket at the time. Now I am sure of it. Like all the members of the military profession, I never had a thought of my own until I left the service. My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of higher-ups. This is typical with everyone in the military service.

I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912 (where have I heard that name before?). I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested.

During those years, I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a swell racket. Looking back on it, I feel that I could have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents

So, when they tell you that North Korea is the enemy you know it is not true. You know that this is another engineered conflict for profit. Example? OK look at the top 15 companies making profit out of war in 2007

Lockheed Martin Corp……… $27,320,616,068
Boeing Co…………………………. 20,861,418,121
Northrop Grumman Corp.. …..16,769,641,720
General Dynamics Corp. ………11,472,032,564
Raytheon Co.. . . . . . . . . . ………10,411,293,335
KBR Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ……….5,972,078,973
L-3 Communications . . . . . ……..5,039,851,150
United Technologies Corp. .. ….4,574,841,469
BAE Systems. . . . . . . . . . . ……… 4,500,683,821
SAIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ……….3,404,387,189
General Electric Co.. . . . . . . ……2,933,412,009
Computer Sciences Corp. . . ……2,763,028,827
Humana Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . ……..2,632,567,928
Health Net Inc.. . . . . . . . . . ….. …2,117,988,171
Triwest Healthcare . . . . . . . …… 2,021,460,650

Big business aint it !

it before it starts. Demand your representatives vote NO and protest. Don’t send your family to die for elites profit and entertainment again in another fake war

Give these criminals up America, past and present

May 28, 2009

Women and Children Were Raped At Abu Ghraib

After years of corporate media whitewashing Abu Ghraib abuse in the context of college fraternity-style humiliation, truth about rape and sexual torture of women and children finally being reported

Paul Joseph Watson


Thursday, May 28, 2009

It only took five years, but the mainstream media has finally acknowledged the truth behind why certain photos and videos from the infamous Abu Ghraib prison camp have been blocked from public release – they show U.S. soldiers and other prison guards raping female detainees as well as children.

In an interview with the London Telegraph, Major General Antonio Taguba, the former army officer who conducted an inquiry into the Abu Ghraib jail in Iraq, confirmed the details of his original army report, that the unreleased photos showed rape and sexual abuse of women and minors. “At least one picture shows an American soldier apparently raping a female prisoner while another is said to show a male translator raping a male detainee,” reports the Telegraph, adding, “Further photographs are said to depict sexual assaults on prisoners with objects including a truncheon, wire and a phosphorescent tube.”

Taguba also verified the credibility of eyewitness statements from other detainees that described an American-Egyptian male translator in uniform raping teenage boys.

Among the graphic statements, which were later released under US freedom of information laws, is that of Kasim Mehaddi Hilas in which he says: “I saw [name of a translator] ******* a kid, his age would be about 15 to 18 years. The kid was hurting very bad and they covered all the doors with sheets. Then when I heard screaming I climbed the door because on top it wasn’t covered and I saw [name] who was wearing the military uniform, putting his **** in the little kid’s ***…. and the female soldier was taking pictures.” “

These pictures show torture, abuse, rape and every indecency,” Taguba told the Telegraph. Taguba’s confirmation that the photos depict rape mean that President Obama could only have been lying when he claimed, “I want to emphasize that these photos that were requested in this case are not particularly sensational, especially when compared to the painful images that we remember from Abu Ghraib.”

As we reported last week, such horrors have been on the record for years, yet corporate media coverage of the Abu Ghraib scandal still frames the entire issue in the context that the “abuse” consisted merely of college fraternity-style humiliation and stacking prisoners in human pyramids. In reality, the very worst of the torture has never been seen and it includes raping women and children, as well as brutally beating detainees to death.

Further details were also made public by New Yorker investigative journalist Seymour Hersh, who in July 2004 told an ACLU conference, “Some of the worst things that happened you don’t know about, okay?” said Hersh. “Videos, there are women there. Some of you may have read that they were passing letters out, communications out to their men. This is at Abu Ghraib … The women were passing messages out saying ‘Please come and kill me, because of what’s happened’ and basically what happened is that those women who were arrested with young boys, children in cases that have been recorded. The boys were sodomized with the cameras rolling. And the worst above all of that is the soundtrack of the boys shrieking that your government has. They are in total terror.

It’s going to come out.” Following his refusal to release the unseen photos, the ACLU charged that President Obama “has essentially become complicit with the torture that was rampant during the Bush years by being complicit in its coverup.” The Obama administration has also sought to protect intelligence officials involved in torture from prosecution at every turn.

A must hear interview from behind the curtain

May 28, 2009

Regardless of whether you like or loathe the interviewer, this interview with Billionaire Kevin Trudeau is one of the most revealing and eye-opening interviews you will get to hear in your life. Basically you are hearing from the horses mouth what is going on behind the curtain and you are for the first time being told what you can do to protect yourself and counter this

Please, please find time to listen to this interview with Kevin Trudeau. It won’t take much time out of your life, but it will enrich your life immensely

Part 1



Part 2



Part 3



Part 4



Part 5



Part 6



This is how close we are to their goal, just a few years. By then the middle class will be gone. The mega rich and the poorer masses will be left. Once that is established and the world’s resources, water and food are all in the hands of the few you can then expect the microchipping and the various methods of de-population to commence. Expect the number of wars to also increase in the next few years

Get rid of all your debt. Become as self sufficient as possible and you stand a good chance of staying above water long enough to fight this

More propoganda – disagree with the government means you’re mentally ill

May 27, 2009

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Psychologists Weigh In On 9/11

A new article in U.S. News & World Report quotes a couple of psychologists, one sociologist and one historian to argue that people who question the government’s version of 9/11 are prone to false thinking.

Initially, remember that, while there are many honorable psychologists and psychiatrists, psychologists helped to create the U.S. torture program, and actively participated in it.

Also, psychologists – such as Freud’s nephew Edward Bernays – have been central to propaganda efforts for a century (see this, this and this).

Moreover, many mental health professionals have concluded that the official version of 9/11 is false, and that those who believe the official version suffer from emotional problems or defense mechanisms. For example:

  • Associate Clinical Professor of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, as well as Radiology, at Duke University Medical Center D. Lawrence Burk, Jr., MD
  • Board of Governors Distinguished Service Professor of Psychology and Associate Dean of the Graduate School at Ruters University Barry R. Komisaruk
  • Professor Emeritus of Psychology at California Institute of Integral Studies Ralph Metzner
  • Retired Professor of Psychology at Oxford University Graham Harris
  • Ph.D. in Clinical Psychology from the University of Nebraska and licensed Psychologist Ronald Feintech
Finally, it should be obvious that the opinions of mental health professionals are only as sound as their knowledge. For example, a mental health professional in 1640 would likely have labeled Galileo crazy for saying that the Earth orbits around the Sun.

More importantly, a German psychologist who heard from a patient in 1933 – when Hitler started consolidating power in Germany – that Hitler was a dangerous fascist who would launch a world war, try to take over the world and kill millions would likely be labeled as delusional.

Just as with any field, the opinions of mental health professional are only as good as their knowledge.

Indeed, even the 9/11 Commissioners themselves now say that they don’t believe the government’s version of 9/11. For example:

  • The Commission’s co-chairs said that the CIA (and likely the White House) “obstructed our investigation”
  • The Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) – who led the 9/11 staff’s inquiry – saidAt some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened“. He also said “I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years…. This is not spin. This is not true.”

Given that even the 9/11 Commissioners themselves no longer believe the government’s version of 9/11, is a mental health professional who believes the official version really saying that the entire 9/11 Commission is delusional?

Another right removed – Now no right to a lawyer

May 27, 2009

Here is the reversal of the Miranda rights

Add that to the following

Recording of all your e-mails and telephone calls

Ability to listen through your mobile phone speaker even when it is turned off

Warrantless questioning and vehicle searches at illegal roadblocks

Warrantless copying of all information on your laptop, ipod, phone when you enter or leave the country

Indefinite detention under Patriot act

Warrantless GPS tracking of your car

Warrantless taking of DNA even if not convicted or charged with crime

Forced taking of blood by police at stop search points

Police confiscating cameras at arrest scenes

MIAC report listing anyone anti government including war vets as domestic terrorists circulated to police forces

Warrantless no fly list compiled now at 1.5 million, no charges no convictions, cannot own gun either

Banning of protests now moved to “free speech zones” at mmajor events like DNC or RNC

People arrested and convicted for “failing to obey an officer” when being told to stop something that was NOT illegal like holding a banner or wearing a t-shirt, or videoing on the street

and now no right to have a lawyer present when questioned by police

Er… hello? Can anyone say Soviet Union?

Add to that the new laws on free speech and the new Youth force and you have Nazi Germany

Police state here we come

I guarantee you the next thing to go quite quickly will be the 24 hour detention for questioning period. Then after that the 5th Ammendment right to silence will go. Your silence will imply guilt suddenly.

Finally, as has happened in Britain already, it will become illegal to film in public. You will no longer be able to film the police. This is the only defense people have left against the police who somehow have changed from being the peoples friend to being the enemy of the people of Britain, America, (Canada and Australia and NZ).

The police have now proved time and again they are corrupt and our last safety net against them is going to be lost soon. Everyday there is a new video of horrific abuse that would never be known without the cameras rolling. The man shot in the railway station this year or Mr Tomlinson killed by the policeman in London last month would never have been seen

Why do YOU think this has happened?

Time to stand and fight for your children’s future rights

Victims of power games

May 26, 2009

Daniel Estulin is a very hardcore investigative journalist and author who digs in places other journalists will not. He recently went undercover in Africa and I recently read this quote from him about his last trip and for him to say this is something serious

“Africa is an amazing continent, you know for 20,000 dollars you can kill an elephant, for about 15,000 you can kill a lion, for maybe 8,000 you can kill a zebra and for about 20 bucks you can kill a black person and for about a hundred dollars you can kill his whole family. That’s Africa and until you’ve been there you don’t really understand it.”

He also explained the reasons why the whole continent is in turmoil with 32 conflicts and the main centre of conflict in Sudan. It is all being orchestrated by the Colonial powers again trying to carve up the continent for it’s resources, particularly energy. There are Chinese, Iranians and Russians there and Americans, British, French and Israelis are all fighting by proxy in many countries around the continent to keep them from trading, and also compete with eachother

They tell you that Africa is a failed continent but they never tell you why. Ever wonder why Sudan exploded from nothing and this whole Darfor situation exists. How else were the Anglo American Empire going to get a reason to enter the country that China was getting oil from. This is how geopolitics works. This is how the Bilderbergers organise the world. People in Africa DO NOT MATTER and neither do you and I. This is a power game for domination of the world’s energy and minerals. I will be putting together the Bilderberg Group blog soon now the agenda has been leaked

The excuses are getting embarrassing now

May 25, 2009

How much more sleeze is it going to take to get America to admit it’s crimes and send somebody to jail ?

%d bloggers like this: