Archive for the ‘Control Grid’ Category

Ireland’s Drinking Water – Poisoned By Design

September 26, 2010

The other day I was looking at recent photos from from a younger relative’s album, and I noticed something as I turned page after page of the smiling faces of their friends. Something jumped out at me immediately as being painfully and obviously wrong. In every picture, every one of these smiling teenagers had brown and yellow teeth. Not one good white set amongst them and yet these are all middle class families with good dental hygiene. All of those handsome young adults’ smiles were destroyed by discoloured enamel. I was shocked and decided to investigate because this was not how I remember teeth when I was growing up, nor is it what I see from people I meet from other countries.

What I was seeing was the results of a lifetime of drinking fluoridated water, from the bottle to the pint. The staining, flaking and pitting of the teeth enamel caused by the interference in the laying down of the enamel layers during the formation of the teeth by the compound commonly known as Fluoride, that is added to our water supply.

Now it is an age old adage that the teeth are a window into the health of the body, Slave traders would always check the teeth of a potential purchase. So is this an indication of more serious problems in the body?

This substance is in fact a byproduct of the aluminium and fertilizer businesses and is classified as toxic waste so dangerous that it cannot be dumped. It is also used as an insecticide, in rat poison and as an ingredient in military nerve gas. A lethal dose of fluoride can in fact kill a human being in just two hours.

The toxicology report describes sodium fluoride as a “protoplasmic poison” which means that when it is dissolved in water it becomes readily absorbed through the mouth, throat and digestive tract. It can also be absorbed through the skin while you bathe and even inhaled.

The symptoms of fluoride poisoning are many and varied depending on exposure ranging from nausea, abdominal problems and sores to more serious problems like damage to the kidneys, thyroid gland, pineal gland, bone cancer, osteoporosis and neurological damage.

This is all common knowledge, so you may ask what on earth is causing the inertia in Ireland on the issue of fluoride? All around the world the practice of fluoridating water has been exposed as unsafe and has been removed from the supply, yet here in Ireland the advocates for it’s removal seem to be running into a stone wall of intransigence from the various government departments in the face of overwhelming evidence and best practice in other countries. No other country in Europe bar Britain (partially) fluoridates water.

Following this story over the years one couldn’t help but conclude that there was a determination to keep fluoride in the water regardless of whatever evidence is presented. Even to the point of defending the indefensible. So who is blocking this and why are they doing it?

Pressure has been mounting on the politicians of late. From what I have heard first hand there have been a plethora of people contacting representatives about this issue, especially the Green Party members of government. John Gormley himself promised some of my associates that the fluoride issue was currently under review and he was awaiting a new report. Although when pressed on why this report has not been published he had no answer.

His last report criticising fluoridation in 2006 was blocked at the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health and Children by the government. Indeed John Gormley seemed to have grasped the nettle back in 2007 when he went on RTE Prime Time and demanded fluoride be removed, citing the the terrible scourge of dental fluorosis that is affecting 40% of our children now and the risk of bone cancer. However since he went into government he seems to have done a u-turn.

It appears to be government policy to continue to add this poison regardless of whatever evidence is placed in front of them. Yet on investigation I find there is very little independent science backing the use of fluoride and this is borne out by the York University report from 2000.

Only this week The Examiner printed a damning letter from Cathy Sinnott highlighting the terrible downside of fluoride ingestion, but up until this the mainstream media have been conspicuous by their absence on this very serious issue.

Not that there is a lack of information for them to report on and force the Department of Health to answer the difficult questions. For instance we have the 2002 North South report which highlighted the fact that children in the Republic had three times the incidence of dental fluorosis than those in the Northern Ireland, who did not fluoridate, and that the incidence had increased seven fold between 1984 and 2002.

In 2001 a group of dentists (IDOF) also broke ranks with the mainstream view this decade and brought a case against Mary Harney and her Health Department. This being the same pairing that have since continued to push the HPV vaccine against the backdrop of all the deaths and injuries from the vaccine in the US and Britain. This also being the same pairing who are still behind the continued push to vaccinate every child with the H1N1 vaccine even after the EU Commissioner for health declared it a fraud. So there is clearly a very poor and complicit track record to consider here.

Even now in the US the Centre for Disease Control and the American Dental Association have issued guidelines that fluoridated water should not be given to children under four nor mixed with baby milk formula. The Food Safety Authority of Ireland reported the same thing to the government. However pressure seems to have been applied by government and now they have changed their finding, omitting the desire to stop fluoridating water and replaced it with a statement that all mothers should breast feed, though how this helps most children over a year isn’t explained.

There are even newer reports available now from the US highlighting the clear correlation between fluoridated water areas and the increased incidences of bone cancer, osteoporosis and broken bones, so why are these reports being ignored in Ireland?

A Sordid History

The history of this substance is a very sordid business and the dangerous effects of fluoride seem to have been known by it’s advocates for a very long time. Extensive toxicology studies were done in the US and published in neurotoxicology journals back in the 1994 by Dr Phyllis Mullenix of the Harvard Medical School. It was also presented to the US National Institute of Dental Research who then buried the results.

What the study found was that fluoride could cause a permanent change in the behavior of animals with as little as 3 days exposure. It also documented changes in behavior that included many the symptoms of what psychiatrists are now calling ADHD. It also documented a condition they called “couch potato syndrome” which has all the same symptoms of what we call chronic fatigue syndrome.

Mullenix’s team discovered that the fluoride finds it’s way into the brain which was contrary to what officialdom’s advocates of fluoride say in their literature. Yet they continue this charade despite the fact that these changes to the mental state were known as far back as 1944 when the original fluoride tests were done, as has been discovered in declassified US documents from the Manhatton Project.

The documents reveal a catalogue of deceit including orders from the highest levels for the cessation of all tests regarding mental confusion due to fluoride intake, even though funding had originally been given to carry them out.

However the most cynical document of all was a memo from 1946 from the project’s chief pharmacologist sent to the Colonel in charge regarding chemical releases on the public, identifying fluoride with absolute certainty as the cause of neurological damage and illness. The memo then goes on to state “Would there be any use at making attempts to counteract the local fear of fluoride ……… through lectures in fluoride toxicology and perhaps the usefulness of fluoride in tooth health”.

So it was 1946 that the lie was hatched about dental health and the coverup of the terrible effects on the central nervous system and literally the character of humanity. With all of this known the government of the US then went about promoting fluoride as “good for your teeth” in a marketing plan devised by the recognised king of manipulation of public opinion Edward Bernays, the nephew of Sigmund Freud and the man who convinced women that smoking was good for women’s equality amongst other things.

It seems strikingly obvious that the governments of the old Empire like Canada, Australia, Britain, Ireland and the US have knowingly and deliberately maintained the illusion that fluoride is safe. They have kept this mind altering substance in the water for a reason. Perhaps because a nation of couch potatos would be much easier to control and will not threaten the authority of the elite group who run things?

Confirmation of this hypothesis might be strengthened when one realises that fluoride can be found in many pharmaceuticals including those used in the treatment of depression. What this amounts to is the forced medication of a population. This is illegal under international law since the Nuremberg Code was drafted after the end of World War II.

It is interesting that the issue of mass drugging of populations made it into the Nuremberg code because the Nazis at the Nuremberg trials were guilty of using fluoride in the water supply to their concentration camp prison population to keep them “docile”. I’m sure the Gestapo weren’t interested in the inmates’ children’s healthy teeth.

Don’t think that the Nazis were the first to think of it though. Stalin’s regime used fluoride in the prison water supply from the 1930s as a tranquilizer. This was when the idea was exported to Britain. In testimony to the government in the Un-American Activities Report in 1939 it was revealed that Communist sympathisers in the US has discussed using fluoride to make the population docile while they brought in Communism by degrees in the US upon a lethargic population. Even to the point of keeping a large store of fluoride at each reservior in the event they needed to poison the population to maintain power.

So you see there is a long and established history of mass medication and tranquilizing of the population with this chemical. Fluoride is a highly toxic and lethal substance in very small quantities. It can cause illness and mental disorder, and it can be used to subdue the spirit of anyone who drinks it. As chemist Charles Perkins famously said in 1954 “Any person who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person mentally or physically.”

Fluoride is a medication and it is a fact that any medication that is to be allowed used in Ireland MUST be approved by the Irish Medicines Board. Fluoride has never been approved for use in water by the IMB and hence those responsible of keeping it in our water are guilty of a crime.

Finally, one of the most shocking aspects I have discovered about fluoride is that it has been shown that there is a chemical process whereby the fluoride attracts aluminium and tricks the body into allowing it to pass through the blood/brain barrier. It should be noted that studies have shown an increased level of aluminium in the brains of people who suffer from altzhiemers disease, which we all see is on the increase and is affecting people younger and younger to different degrees.

All of these issues are being purposefully ignored by the authorities and when you look at the whole picture, with our isolation in Europe as the only country out of 500 million people who are given no choice but to drink fluoridated water, and the flat out intransigence of the government, you might conclude that we are somehow being used as a mass social experiment in population control. By the way people sit idly by while the politicians are robbing the banks in broad daylight, I think it is working.

As a measure of how cynical this defense of the forced medication of the public is and how far the government, for whatever reason, will go to maintain it, I refer to the constitutional challenge made in 1967. In this case the plaintiff challenged the practice based on a right to bodily integrity. However, the judge ruled that there was no case to answer as the government is not obliged to supply water to the population and the people are not obliged to drink it. Well now the government are trying to introduce water charges I think we will see a new challenge very soon because this man certainly will not be paying for his poison.

It may also have escaped your notice that fluoridated toothpaste used to carry a warning that if you swallow a pea sized amount of toothpaste you should call poison control, however in more recent times this warning has been quietly removed from the instructions on the tube by the manufacturers, as if fluoride magically became safe to swallow.

This persistent and deliberate sidelining of all scientific information that highlights fluoride as the danger to public health that it has always been known to be, is an act of criminality on the part of the people controlling the information. The good people of Ireland must stand up to these criminals and demand prosecutions for the mass poisoning of a population before another generation is destroyed.


Advertisements

Why the government wants to control your paycheck – an attack on the Sovereign movement

September 23, 2010

This week in the UK a proposal is being discussed by the Inland Revenue to take away control of your weekly or monthly pay from your employers and put it into their hands. The idea is that your employer will make deductions for union fees and pensions and the like, and then the money is paid to the Revenue who will deduct everyone’s tax as they see fit. Finally the Revenue will then pay the balance into your bank account. It is in a consultation period at the moment which ends today, after which they will be making revised proposals to the government to introduce legislation.

Most people would balk at the idea of the government coming anywhere near their private income but the BBC have been selling the story as if it is a fabulous idea that nobody should have any problems with. The way they will spin the idea is that it will save money for companies in accounting and will eliminate the duplication of work between accounts departments in companies and the revenue and the eventual balancing act that occurs. Perhaps there might be a saving overall, there is logic in that, but this is not why they want their hands in your pockets.

That is the question they will not push on the BBC, i.e. why exactly do the government want so desperately to take control of your money and to have access to your bank accounts? This seems quite openly now to be the next big step in the steady construction of the Big Brother state. A state that already sports CCTV cameras everywhere, even in homes, spying on your telecoms and emails, and a campaign of “report on your neighbours” that is disintegrating society.

David Cameron and Nick Clegg campaigned in the election to deconstruct this surveillance system that they blamed the Labour government for constructing, yet, as with every administration in the so called free world, they seem to be doing the complete reverse of what they promised before they were elected and are building upon what has been left to them.

What is the motivation for this though and why now? Well in this writers opinion what we are seeing here is a massive gamble by the government in reaction to the growing understanding amongst the awakened members of the public to the corruption of the system. To be more specific, there has been a huge awakening over the last two or three years to the fact that government is not in fact representing the men and women in the country, but is working for a corporate elite and managing a system of law that is solely commercial in nature.

The Common Law we thought we were living under has been replaced by Commercial or Admiralty Law of the Sea, and is implemented through Statutes and Acts that have no jurisdiction over flesh and blood men and women or above Common Law. These statutes and acts are all contracts and can therefore only be acted upon us with our consent. this is the great fraud.

Remember, if you look in the companies register you will find that the government is now a corporation, as well as every court, police force, council, utility, and even schools,  prisons and all government departments including Revenue.. All operating for profit and generating revenue. Hence the massive increase in legislation with monetary value attached to be extracted from us.

People who have discovered this and have researched remedies to it, have discovered how to beat the system. They have discovered that they can choose weather to operate in the public domain, using their legal fiction corporate entity, i.e. their NAME (all caps), which is registered to the government by your birth certificate and is owned by them and so can be acted upon by them, as it appears on any correspondence with government or utilities etc; or, alternatively people can choose not to use it but to operate in the private as themselves. In doing this they are not contracting commercially with the government system and therefore cannot be acted upon by the system.

How are these two linked? Well by not contracting with the system, people are able to avoid paying fines, taxes, bills etc issued by councils, utilities, courts, police, and revenue. Clearly the information has been spreading far and wide and is becoming a major worry that the scam might be realised by more and more people very quickly, and has forced the government into this kind of knee jerk reaction.

So by taking away control of your pay, the government will give themselves the power to deduct any amount of tax it deems correct. It may also raise tax at will without any possibility of taxation revolt. Furthermore they will have the ability to deduct from your pay any amount from any fines, council charges, court orders, debts, etc before you ever see your money in your account. All of the statutes, that are unenforceable on men and women without their consent, will be monetarily enforced before we even have the chance to lawfully do anything about it

This is how they are going to destroy the sovereign freeman movement which has discovered the corporate corruption that is masquerading as government in western nations. This will become a cashless society where everyone is a state employee in effect and you are dependent upon the state for money. Anyone who steps out of line or harbours opinions that differ from that of the state can then have their lives made very difficult indeed.

This is something that our elders fought against, that even our own crazies in our governments tell us was a terrible evil system when it was operated by Hitler or Stalin or Mau or in any other historical dictatorship. Yet here they are implementing it themselves in a new and improved version that is right out of Orwell’s 1984.

This is not going to be isolated to the UK. They are simply a testing ground to see how easily it can be implemented. Make no mistake, all other countries will follow suit, especially in Europe. Undoubtedly Ireland will be the first to fall in line as usual as they are still in reality under Crown (City of London) rule.

This will force an even bigger sea change in the minds of the people who already understand the fake reality of the system we live in. It will force them to make UK irrelevant. To leave the Corporate UK lawfully and exist as a private man or woman on the land, as many already have. It will mean groups will arise who no longer recognise the jurisdiction of the government over the land and this is going to lead to major conflict with the corporate police state that is being built.

As has happened before during depressions down the centuries, groups or regions are going to start issuing their own money and barter so as to avoid joining the UK Corporate system. This has already started happening in some places as a way of keeping the money in a town or village by issuing town money to trade in local outlets only. This is happening worldwide now as the system starts to crumble.

The black market is going to grow exponentially and the number of people renouncing UK citizenship will likewise increase. This will accelerate the system towards failure. So communities need to get together now and plan for their removal from the overreaching and interference of the Corporate government. By doing this they will hasten the system’s demise and be better placed to prosper when it does.

In a way this kind of outlandish legislative intrusion into our private lives by big government who promised to reverse this trend will only serve to wake up millions more people to the lies as the veneer falls from the tyranny of a government owned by and run for the benefit of an elite group of banking families.

.

Are the military’s scientists playing God with our planet ?

April 19, 2010



This is a question on many people’s minds these days. There have been ever increasing revelations of secret military projects past and present, ranging from mind control to biological testing on the public, which have remained largely buried until recently. The speed and access to information afforded by the internet has now combined with good old fashioned detective work using freedom of information requests and trawling through declassified documents, and has enabled researchers to piece together the true history and nature of some of these projects. One of the most current and infamous of these projects is HAARP.

HAARP stands for High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program and is a US military facility in Gakona, south eastern Alaska. It is run jointly by the US Navy and Air Force and the main focal point of the facility is a field of linked antennae which together can direct massive amounts of energy, in the form of high frequency electro-magnetic radiation, into the upper atmosphere.

OFFICIAL SECRETS

Officially the facility is for research into the ionosphere which is a highly charged layer of the earth’s upper atmosphere that protects us from the sun’s radiation. When questioned about what they are doing there we are told that it is used to re-create the effects of the sun and can also simulate the northern lights. No other definitive uses are admitted to, so why would the military be interested in painting colours in the sky?

Well, if we go back through the history we will find out. This technology was patented in 1987 by Bernard Eastlund (US patent 4,686,605) and was designed to the backdrop of the cold war and Ronald Reagan’s space based “star wars” missile defence hoax. What Eastlund’s purely security minded motives had led him to invent was a ground based defence shield. His list of uses for his invention include disruption of land or satellite based communications including radar to affect enemy aircraft or missiles; destroying planes or missiles; deflecting missiles by lifting the ionosphere hundreds of miles out into space.

These all seem like reasonable goals for a futuristic defence system. So why is this of any concern? Well, because the nature of this system allows it to travel along the natural magnetic field lines of the earth, Eastlund expresses the potential of this system to affect not only the local area but much farther afield. Long time HAARP researcher Dr Nick Begich believes that it has the potential to shut down all other communication systems around the world, excepting their own, by flooding large ares with electromagnetic waves. A weapon this powerful in any nation’s hands is a worrying development, and especially in the hands of a country that might be building an empire.

Now we are all aware of how the military will take any and every new technology for peace and turn it into a weapon of war. Look at the humble microwave, used for ovens and telecommunications, yet it has recently been turned into a microwave canon that can burn the skin of protestors when fired at by police. So using this invention for offensive measures is a perfectly reasonable assumption. Remember also that this technology was designed in the early 1980s when computers were only first marketed, so imagine how much further the technology will have advanced if it paralleled the IT industry’s advances. With this in mind there are now plenty of educated observers who are rightly questioning HAARP on a number of sinister possibilities. Indeed there are many follow on patents held by military contractor Raytheon, who now run HAARP research for the military, that Dr Begich explains detail the weaponised uses of the antennae array.

WEATHER WEAPON

The original patent declared it to be capable of weather manipulation. Indeed if you heat a portion of the ionosphere and lift it hundreds of miles into space it stands to reason that the air from below and beside the rising mass will rush in to fill the void. This will cause dramatic changes to the high atmospheric wind patterns. Eastlund also describes how to carry particles into the magnetosphere to either deflect or absorb more sunlight.

It should be noted that HAARP is not the only facility of it’s type in the world. The US will only admit to running three currently, but other estimates have put the worldwide number as high as 76 facilities owned by many different countries. Indeed there has always been paranoia in the US that the Russians were using scalar wave technology to wage weather wars on them. They have had an Office of Weather Modification in the Whitehouse since 1952. This technology was and is very real and was so worrying that the UN drafted a resolution in 1974 that limited weather modification to ones own borders and banned it’s use as a weapon. With all this going on for the last few decades and this technology being used worldwide plus decades of aerosol spraying, it does bring into question the motives of governments claiming climate change.

TECTONIC WEAPON

One of Eastlund’s other clams was that the system can be used to bounce back extra low frequency waves (ELF) to earth to communicate below ground, with submarines for instance. The estimates of the power now being shot up into the atmosphere from HAARP are in the billions of Watts, so when you consider that it only takes a mere 30 Watts of power using ELF to vibrate the earth enough to locate oil, coal and gas then you can understand why many scientists are wondering what a billion Watts would do when aimed at a fault in the earth and vibrating at the correct frequency. So have the US really perfected the earthquake machine?

This can only be speculated of course but we can look for unanswered questioned, like why was the HAARP usage data for the day before the Haiti earthquake erased, and why was there a US “excercise” for tsunami relief to Haiti running at the exact same time? Coincidental ? Perhaps, but these “exercises” coincidences have happened too many times now. Further the incidences of earthquakes have shown a marked jump since this facility went fully online and there have been a number of surprising events like Haiti, the Asian tsunami and even last weeks Icelandic volcano that have happened without any significant seismic activity preceding them and have scientists asking questions.. Whether this is due to a directed ELF wave or because the earth is reacting to the damage being done to it’s finely balanced natural power grid, the questions need to be answered.

The belief in this weapon exists at the highest levels as demonstrated by the Chinese accusing the US of causing the 2008 Sichuan earthquake based on scientific information given to them by Russia. With this in mind it should be noted that Eastlund referenced and expanded upon the work of Nicola Tesla for his invention. Tesla was the pioneer of the rediscovery and use of the earths natural energy fields, and before the end of WW2 he claimed to have invented what he termed the “death ray”. On Tesla’s death all his research immediately “disappeared”, no doubt into the Pentagon.

MIND WEAPON

Eastlund also proved that HAARP could piggyback a second signal and direct it to a target for communication purposes. However this fact also means that the potential for mass mind or mood manipulation is very real. The resonating frequencies of the human mind are well known as are the frequencies it takes to induce feelings like anxiety, lethargy, lack of sleep or even euphoria. The only problem has been devising a system to disperse the signals on a large scale. This problem may well have been solved. The uses of this kind of technology are frightening as they could be used in everything from war to elections on a mass scale.

This is all well known to those in power. For instance these entries taken from a book by Zbignew Brzezinski, head of the Rand Corporation, the national security advisor to President Carter and election advisor to Barack Obama, written over 25 years ago reads:- “Political strategists are tempted to exploit research on the brain and human behavior. Geophysicist Gordon J.F. MacDonald, a specialist in problems of warfare, says accurately-timed, artificially-excited electronic strokes could lead to a pattern of oscillations that produce relatively high power levels over certain regions of the earth … in this way one could develop a system that would seriously impair the brain performance of very large populations in selected regions over an extended period … no matter how deeply disturbing the thought of using the environment to manipulate behavior for national advantages, to some, the technology permitting such use will very probably develop within the next few decades.”

Well, that technology was being used on a small scale in the 1960s in Moscow on an unsuspecting US embassy so you can guarantee the world has been perfecting it during the following fifty years. So real is the possibility that a Bill was introduced into the US Congress in 2001 (HR 2977) called The Space Preservation Act. It was to reaffirm the non-militarisation of space and the upper atmosphere including provisions for HAARP and it’s potentials as a weapon. However the Bill went no further after receiving “unfavourable executive comment” from the Department of Defense.

VANDALISM

When the military takes control of a science they are only interested in it’s military uses, none of which are good for us or the planet. They have been zapping our atmosphere for the last 60 years and now that HAARP has been operating since the 1990s we have seen what can only be described as a fever descend on the earth.

The planet operates a very intricate and sensitive system, almost like a single living organism. It’s atmosphere is made up of many different concentric layers interlaced with a veritable spiders web of magnetic force lines, planetary power grids and a vast range of creatures and ecosystems that rely on these being in balance. A facility like HAARP is cutting through those grids and sending disruptive signals through those power lines. It is not then surprising that the earth seems to be letting off a lot of steam to try to redress the balance of what we could call the mental abuse they are inflicting on the planet with facilities like HAARP

One of the clearest indicators of these effects is the animal life. We have seen birds, fish and other creatures suffering problems with migration due to changes in the electromagnetic fields of the earth. We are also seeing in the last 15 years the disappearance of the bees who are extremely sensitive to electro-magnetic fields. Without bees we will starve within five years, yet no effort seems to have been made to correlate this with experiments of this sort.

What they are doing to the atmosphere is fraught with unknowns that may or may not have catastrophic results when they next crank up the HAARP beam for the biggest energy boost yet. This atmosphere belongs to all of us. Whatever they do affects us all. It should not be theirs to experiment on or risk destroying. It is time the people started taking responsibility and asking questions about these questionable experiments, even if only to eliminate them from suspicion. However, once something like this gets into military hands, then very little good ever comes of it.


Data shows world is cooling fast, yet warming hoax juggernaut rolls on

November 2, 2009

sn0w-dees

Below is an article, (reprinted for educational reason) by Dr Tim Ball on the current trend in global temperatures based on REAL data. It seem that the overwhelming ACTUAL data related to climate change as we now call it is proving only one thing. That the planet is is mortal danger of cooling down at a very rapid rate. The data collected since Al Gore’s error ridden film An Inconvenient Truth has shown the opposite to all the predictions he and the IPCC have made.

So with the science clearly disproving the theory of the IPCC, the question remains, why are they ignoring the data and pressing on with their agenda based on a lie? (comment after article)

Current Global Temperatures Impossible According to IPCC ‘Science’.

By Dr. Tim Ball Monday, November 2, 2009

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon says, “Unless we fight climate change, unless we stop this trend, we’ll have devastating consequences for humanity.”

Other leaders make similar silly statements. Obama claims the “threat from climate change is serious, it is urgent, and it is growing.”

But which way is it growing? Which trend are they going to stop? The one predicted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) or the one Mother Nature is providing? They’ve chosen the IPCC even though all their predictions (scenarios) are wrong. But it is worse. Global temperatures of the last few years are impossible according to the ‘science’ of the (IPCC).

What’s Actually Happening?

Temperatures were predicted to increase but are declining (Figure 1). Even their lowest scenario says the world should be at least 0.3¬∞C warmer. Doesn’t sound like much but it equals half the warming they claim occurred in the preceding 130 years.

ball110209-1

Figure 1: Global average temperature 2002 to 2009 and IPCC scenarios.

As physicist David Douglass said, “If the facts are contrary to any predictions, then the hypothesis is wrong no matter how appealing.”

Facts Contradict Hypothesis

Many people pointed to facts contradicting the “appealing” hypothesis but were ignored or marginalized for several reasons. These included; apparent support from rising global temperatures between 1980 and 1998; evidence too technical for most people; effective personal attacks on skeptics; Gore’s slick propaganda movie An Inconvenient Truth despite 35 scientific errors; and the mainstream media was ignorant of the science and biased.

A plethora of evidence has not brought the hypothesis down. For example,

The Medieval Warm Period 1000 years ago was warmer than today.

The Holocene Optimum from 3000 to 8000 years ago was warmer than today.

The last three Interglacial periods were warmer than the current one.

The claim of 0.6 degrees C rise during industrial times was unverifiable because the scientist refused to disclose the evidence and then the government ‘lost’ the data.

Four of the warmest years on record in the US were in the 1930s not the 1990s as claimed.

1934 was the warmest in the US not 1998 as claimed.

The Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS) adjusted historic data down to make the modern record relatively warmer.

Temperature increases before CO2 in all records.

CO2 levels currently at 388 ppm are the lowest in 300 million years.

There’s a limit of at most 1.4 degrees C to the amount of temperature can increase even if CO2 doubles or triples.

In the 20th century human production of CO2 didn’t fit the temperature record. From 1900 to 1940 human CO2 production levels were low but temperatures increased the most. From 1940 to 1980 human production levels increased the most but temperature declined.

The models predicted the atmosphere would warm faster than the surface but the opposite is happening.

These are more than enough facts to show the hypothesis is wrong. Polls indicate the public is learning, but AGW proponents and politicians are not and continue to push their political agendas.

Nature Not Playing By The Rules

Now they face facts everyone can grasp. The Earth is cooling with record low temperatures everywhere, a contradiction with the IPCC hypothesis anyone can grasp without scientific understanding. Figure 2 shows 1998 was an unusually warm year attributed to El Nino. 1999 was cooler and AGW proponents correctly said the drop from 1998 was not evidence of a trend.

ball110209-2

Figure 2: Global temperatures 1985 to 2009 and atmospheric CO2 levels.

Temperatures increased slightly again in 2000 (Figure 2) seeming to support the AGW contention. However, since 2002 temperatures declined gradually, making a trend that began in the Southern Hemisphere 10 years earlier global. AGW proponents are now trying to prove the trend doesn’t exist.

They play statistical games by pre-determining the trend by the starting point chosen. Choosing 2002 as a starting point appears to play the same game, however, there’s a major difference. The decline can’t happen according to the IPCC hypothesis. Their report says, “Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic GHG concentrations.”

“Very likely” is defined as greater than 90 percent likelihood.

They reinforce the point; “During the past 50 years, the sum of solar and volcanic forcings would likely have produced cooling. Observed patterns of warming and their changes are simulated only by models that include anthropogenic forcings.” But according to their Reports CO2 levels have continued to increase due to human additions. “Global GHG emissions due to human activities have grown since pre-industrial times, with an increase of 70% between 1970 and 2004.”

The second statement is also false because they don’t include two of the three known mechanisms of solar causes of temperature change in their models. They did acknowledge, “Difficulties remain in simulating and attributing observed temperature changes at smaller than continental scales” They must say this because they report, “It is likely that there has been significant anthropogenic warming over the past 50 years averaged over each continent (except Antarctica).” If CO2 was causing temperature increase it should be global. So what is happening cannot happen. The hypothesis and the models built on it are wrong. Temperature declining while CO2 increased did force one change; they switched focus from global warming to climate change.

Climate Change: What Happens When Nature Disobeys Government.

Political leaders say they are going to stop climate change. It is an arrogant, ignorant claim adopted because they accepted IPCC claims and then chose to ignore scientific evidence showing they were wrong. Now they’re ignoring nature, which doesn’t listen as the evidence shows. As Douglass says, “One finds the truth by making a hypothesis and comparing observations with the hypothesis.” The observations don’t support the hypothesis but that doesn’t matter because it fits the political objective. British MP Jeremy Thorpe said “Greater love hath no man than this, that he lay down his friends for his political life.” Our leaders are laying the people down for their political lives. Sadly none of them will ever be held accountable, but the people will pay the price.

(2) Reader Feedback | Subscribe

Dr. Tim Ball Most recent columns

Copyright © 2009 CFP

“Dr. Tim Ball is a renowned environmental consultant and former climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg. Dr. Ball employs his extensive background in climatology and other fields as an advisor to the International Climate Science Coalition, Friends of Science and the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.”

Dr. Ball can be reached at: Letters@canadafreepress.com

Original article in Canada Free Press

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/16460

For the answer we must look at who stands to gain from this plan to implement the “cure” for this non existent problem.

The “cure”, apparently, is multi-faceted and includes plans to monitor and tax every carbon creating activity known to man. Also there is a plan to create a carbon credit trade to allow developing countries to sell offsets to developed ones. There doesn’t however seem to be any attempt to cut any of the carbon these people are still blaming for the now non existent problem. With no limits being put on developing countries and developed ones being able to buy offsets to allow them to continue to produce carbon, then what exactly will the carbon trade achieve?

This is where you find out who gains. The Carbon credit trade will be run by the very man who is pushing the lie, Al Gore. His company will make billions in trade fees from trading these carbon credits. This is Gore’s pay off for pushing the agenda that will establish a carbon tax that will be paid to the UN run Environmental Government that is about to be created in Copenhagen in December. This carbon tax is the funding the World Government requires to further it’s aims to become a full World Government of the New World Order.

The aspect of this “cure” that is uppermost in the aims of the people behind it is the control and tracking aspect of carbon taxing. In order to be taxed, you must be monitored and controlled. The result of monitoring is that your every move, whereabouts and activity will be known to the governments. Total control means the powers that control you can never be removed.

It is very simple when you look at the reality behind pushing the lie against all evidence to the contrary. So please realise that nothing these people do happens for your benefit, as you will be the ones paying. Everything they do is for a reason they do not divulge to us, but when you look at the evidence it is so obvious.

Get your free Obamaphone

October 25, 2009

mi-fone-mi-205f-obama-phone

Here is an interesting development in the control grid society. Free phones and free call minutes for people on Federal Government assistance programs, food stamps, etc. Now why would the Federal Government want to give free phones away with free calls to everyone on any type of welfare or housing program?

Obamaphone

Site adress

https://www.safelinkwireless.com/EnrollmentPublic/home.aspx

Here is a breakdown of the info on the site. Note that at the bottom of every info page you will find a box asking for your zip code to apply for a phone.

 

Lifeline Benefits

Lifeline Assistance is part of a program that was created by the government to provide discounted or free telephone service to income-eligible consumers. To help bring you this important benefit, SafeLink Wireless is proud to offer Lifeline Service. Through our Lifeline Service you will receive FREE cellular service, a FREE cell phone, andFREE Minutes every month! SafeLink Wireless Service does not cost anything – there are no contracts, no recurring fees and no monthly charges.

Any Minutes you do not use will roll-over. Features such as caller ID, call waiting and voicemail are all also included with your service. If you need additional Minutes, you can buy TracFone Airtime Cards at any TracFone retailer Walmart, Walgreens, Family Dollar, etc). SafeLink Airtime Cards will be available soon.

Your exact benefits, including the number of free Minutes you will receive, depend on the state you live in. Please enter your ZIP code to get the details for your state.

How to Qualify

The process to qualify for Lifeline Service depends on the State you live in. In general, you may qualify if…

  • You already participate in other State or Federal assistance program such as Federal Public Housing Assistance, Food Stamps and Medicaid.

    OR

  • Your total household income is at or below 135% of the poverty guidelines set by your State and/or the Federal Government.

    AND

  • No one in your household currently receives Lifeline Service through another phone carrier.

  • You have a valid United States Postal Address. In order for us to ship you your free phone you must live at a residence that can receive mail from the US Post Office. Sorry, but P.O. Boxes cannot be accepted.

  • In addition to meeting the guidelines above you will also be required to provide proof of your participation in an assistance program, or proof of your income level.

    How to Apply

    The process to apply for SafeLink Wireless Service depends on the state you live in. In general, there are several different ways to apply.

     

    COMMENT

     

    This seems a little strange at a time when the country is bankrupt, that they would run a program like this. I suppose many who still believe that the Republicans are a separate party from the Democrats might say this was buying votes from the poor leading up to the 2010 elections. Perhaps but we have learned that it doesn’t matter who controls the houses on Capital Hill, the same agenda moves forward regardless.

    My feelings would be more towards the surveillance society being put into place. We have seen stories this year about mobile phones being used by the NSA as listening devises even when the phone is not being used. We are also aware that the NSA now records all your calls. Well many people still use cell phones that are unregistered to avoid this type of interference. This new program however requires a name, date of birth, and zip code to apply for one. This will enable the NSA to identify everyone with one of these phones to an address.

    Offering this free will also make many people forego their privacy. The same thing has been mooted with internet access, whereby people will be offered a limited service for free. The desire is to remove as many people as possible from the full exposure of the internet. This was talked about in the Internet2 discussions.

    Perhaps it isn’t that sinister at all and they simply want us to get brain cancer ?


    %d bloggers like this: