Posts Tagged ‘harney’

Ireland’s Drinking Water – Poisoned By Design

September 26, 2010

The other day I was looking at recent photos from from a younger relative’s album, and I noticed something as I turned page after page of the smiling faces of their friends. Something jumped out at me immediately as being painfully and obviously wrong. In every picture, every one of these smiling teenagers had brown and yellow teeth. Not one good white set amongst them and yet these are all middle class families with good dental hygiene. All of those handsome young adults’ smiles were destroyed by discoloured enamel. I was shocked and decided to investigate because this was not how I remember teeth when I was growing up, nor is it what I see from people I meet from other countries.

What I was seeing was the results of a lifetime of drinking fluoridated water, from the bottle to the pint. The staining, flaking and pitting of the teeth enamel caused by the interference in the laying down of the enamel layers during the formation of the teeth by the compound commonly known as Fluoride, that is added to our water supply.

Now it is an age old adage that the teeth are a window into the health of the body, Slave traders would always check the teeth of a potential purchase. So is this an indication of more serious problems in the body?

This substance is in fact a byproduct of the aluminium and fertilizer businesses and is classified as toxic waste so dangerous that it cannot be dumped. It is also used as an insecticide, in rat poison and as an ingredient in military nerve gas. A lethal dose of fluoride can in fact kill a human being in just two hours.

The toxicology report describes sodium fluoride as a “protoplasmic poison” which means that when it is dissolved in water it becomes readily absorbed through the mouth, throat and digestive tract. It can also be absorbed through the skin while you bathe and even inhaled.

The symptoms of fluoride poisoning are many and varied depending on exposure ranging from nausea, abdominal problems and sores to more serious problems like damage to the kidneys, thyroid gland, pineal gland, bone cancer, osteoporosis and neurological damage.

This is all common knowledge, so you may ask what on earth is causing the inertia in Ireland on the issue of fluoride? All around the world the practice of fluoridating water has been exposed as unsafe and has been removed from the supply, yet here in Ireland the advocates for it’s removal seem to be running into a stone wall of intransigence from the various government departments in the face of overwhelming evidence and best practice in other countries. No other country in Europe bar Britain (partially) fluoridates water.

Following this story over the years one couldn’t help but conclude that there was a determination to keep fluoride in the water regardless of whatever evidence is presented. Even to the point of defending the indefensible. So who is blocking this and why are they doing it?

Pressure has been mounting on the politicians of late. From what I have heard first hand there have been a plethora of people contacting representatives about this issue, especially the Green Party members of government. John Gormley himself promised some of my associates that the fluoride issue was currently under review and he was awaiting a new report. Although when pressed on why this report has not been published he had no answer.

His last report criticising fluoridation in 2006 was blocked at the Joint Oireachtas Committee on Health and Children by the government. Indeed John Gormley seemed to have grasped the nettle back in 2007 when he went on RTE Prime Time and demanded fluoride be removed, citing the the terrible scourge of dental fluorosis that is affecting 40% of our children now and the risk of bone cancer. However since he went into government he seems to have done a u-turn.

It appears to be government policy to continue to add this poison regardless of whatever evidence is placed in front of them. Yet on investigation I find there is very little independent science backing the use of fluoride and this is borne out by the York University report from 2000.

Only this week The Examiner printed a damning letter from Cathy Sinnott highlighting the terrible downside of fluoride ingestion, but up until this the mainstream media have been conspicuous by their absence on this very serious issue.

Not that there is a lack of information for them to report on and force the Department of Health to answer the difficult questions. For instance we have the 2002 North South report which highlighted the fact that children in the Republic had three times the incidence of dental fluorosis than those in the Northern Ireland, who did not fluoridate, and that the incidence had increased seven fold between 1984 and 2002.

In 2001 a group of dentists (IDOF) also broke ranks with the mainstream view this decade and brought a case against Mary Harney and her Health Department. This being the same pairing that have since continued to push the HPV vaccine against the backdrop of all the deaths and injuries from the vaccine in the US and Britain. This also being the same pairing who are still behind the continued push to vaccinate every child with the H1N1 vaccine even after the EU Commissioner for health declared it a fraud. So there is clearly a very poor and complicit track record to consider here.

Even now in the US the Centre for Disease Control and the American Dental Association have issued guidelines that fluoridated water should not be given to children under four nor mixed with baby milk formula. The Food Safety Authority of Ireland reported the same thing to the government. However pressure seems to have been applied by government and now they have changed their finding, omitting the desire to stop fluoridating water and replaced it with a statement that all mothers should breast feed, though how this helps most children over a year isn’t explained.

There are even newer reports available now from the US highlighting the clear correlation between fluoridated water areas and the increased incidences of bone cancer, osteoporosis and broken bones, so why are these reports being ignored in Ireland?

A Sordid History

The history of this substance is a very sordid business and the dangerous effects of fluoride seem to have been known by it’s advocates for a very long time. Extensive toxicology studies were done in the US and published in neurotoxicology journals back in the 1994 by Dr Phyllis Mullenix of the Harvard Medical School. It was also presented to the US National Institute of Dental Research who then buried the results.

What the study found was that fluoride could cause a permanent change in the behavior of animals with as little as 3 days exposure. It also documented changes in behavior that included many the symptoms of what psychiatrists are now calling ADHD. It also documented a condition they called “couch potato syndrome” which has all the same symptoms of what we call chronic fatigue syndrome.

Mullenix’s team discovered that the fluoride finds it’s way into the brain which was contrary to what officialdom’s advocates of fluoride say in their literature. Yet they continue this charade despite the fact that these changes to the mental state were known as far back as 1944 when the original fluoride tests were done, as has been discovered in declassified US documents from the Manhatton Project.

The documents reveal a catalogue of deceit including orders from the highest levels for the cessation of all tests regarding mental confusion due to fluoride intake, even though funding had originally been given to carry them out.

However the most cynical document of all was a memo from 1946 from the project’s chief pharmacologist sent to the Colonel in charge regarding chemical releases on the public, identifying fluoride with absolute certainty as the cause of neurological damage and illness. The memo then goes on to state “Would there be any use at making attempts to counteract the local fear of fluoride ……… through lectures in fluoride toxicology and perhaps the usefulness of fluoride in tooth health”.

So it was 1946 that the lie was hatched about dental health and the coverup of the terrible effects on the central nervous system and literally the character of humanity. With all of this known the government of the US then went about promoting fluoride as “good for your teeth” in a marketing plan devised by the recognised king of manipulation of public opinion Edward Bernays, the nephew of Sigmund Freud and the man who convinced women that smoking was good for women’s equality amongst other things.

It seems strikingly obvious that the governments of the old Empire like Canada, Australia, Britain, Ireland and the US have knowingly and deliberately maintained the illusion that fluoride is safe. They have kept this mind altering substance in the water for a reason. Perhaps because a nation of couch potatos would be much easier to control and will not threaten the authority of the elite group who run things?

Confirmation of this hypothesis might be strengthened when one realises that fluoride can be found in many pharmaceuticals including those used in the treatment of depression. What this amounts to is the forced medication of a population. This is illegal under international law since the Nuremberg Code was drafted after the end of World War II.

It is interesting that the issue of mass drugging of populations made it into the Nuremberg code because the Nazis at the Nuremberg trials were guilty of using fluoride in the water supply to their concentration camp prison population to keep them “docile”. I’m sure the Gestapo weren’t interested in the inmates’ children’s healthy teeth.

Don’t think that the Nazis were the first to think of it though. Stalin’s regime used fluoride in the prison water supply from the 1930s as a tranquilizer. This was when the idea was exported to Britain. In testimony to the government in the Un-American Activities Report in 1939 it was revealed that Communist sympathisers in the US has discussed using fluoride to make the population docile while they brought in Communism by degrees in the US upon a lethargic population. Even to the point of keeping a large store of fluoride at each reservior in the event they needed to poison the population to maintain power.

So you see there is a long and established history of mass medication and tranquilizing of the population with this chemical. Fluoride is a highly toxic and lethal substance in very small quantities. It can cause illness and mental disorder, and it can be used to subdue the spirit of anyone who drinks it. As chemist Charles Perkins famously said in 1954 “Any person who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person mentally or physically.”

Fluoride is a medication and it is a fact that any medication that is to be allowed used in Ireland MUST be approved by the Irish Medicines Board. Fluoride has never been approved for use in water by the IMB and hence those responsible of keeping it in our water are guilty of a crime.

Finally, one of the most shocking aspects I have discovered about fluoride is that it has been shown that there is a chemical process whereby the fluoride attracts aluminium and tricks the body into allowing it to pass through the blood/brain barrier. It should be noted that studies have shown an increased level of aluminium in the brains of people who suffer from altzhiemers disease, which we all see is on the increase and is affecting people younger and younger to different degrees.

All of these issues are being purposefully ignored by the authorities and when you look at the whole picture, with our isolation in Europe as the only country out of 500 million people who are given no choice but to drink fluoridated water, and the flat out intransigence of the government, you might conclude that we are somehow being used as a mass social experiment in population control. By the way people sit idly by while the politicians are robbing the banks in broad daylight, I think it is working.

As a measure of how cynical this defense of the forced medication of the public is and how far the government, for whatever reason, will go to maintain it, I refer to the constitutional challenge made in 1967. In this case the plaintiff challenged the practice based on a right to bodily integrity. However, the judge ruled that there was no case to answer as the government is not obliged to supply water to the population and the people are not obliged to drink it. Well now the government are trying to introduce water charges I think we will see a new challenge very soon because this man certainly will not be paying for his poison.

It may also have escaped your notice that fluoridated toothpaste used to carry a warning that if you swallow a pea sized amount of toothpaste you should call poison control, however in more recent times this warning has been quietly removed from the instructions on the tube by the manufacturers, as if fluoride magically became safe to swallow.

This persistent and deliberate sidelining of all scientific information that highlights fluoride as the danger to public health that it has always been known to be, is an act of criminality on the part of the people controlling the information. The good people of Ireland must stand up to these criminals and demand prosecutions for the mass poisoning of a population before another generation is destroyed.


Advertisements

More Health Department misinformation is putting Irish schoolgirls’ lives at risk

June 25, 2010

The HPV vaccine fraud as Gardasil reaches Irish schools

In September this year the government are going to roll out yet another vaccine programme aimed at our children. It is called the human papillomavirus vaccine or HPV. The HSE are marketing the use of this vaccine in Ireland on the basis of it curing cervical cancer and hence saving the lives of the 73 women a year who die of that particular cancer. In this campaign they are being disingenuous.

What the HSE are allowing to happen is a false idea to circulate through the media that this vaccine prevents cancer when in fact it is designed only to prevent a virus that might possibly cause some types of cervical cancer. Yes it really is that vague.

In fact in the manufacturer’s (Merck) own words from their US television advertisements they say that “Gardasil (HPV vaccine) is the only vaccine that may protect you from four types of the papilloma virus (type 6, 11, 16 and 18) that may cause 70% of cervical cancers, and that It does not protect against all types of cervical cancer, and it may not protect everyone”. So with that kind of uncertainty, why do the Department of Health feel this was a good or even necessary investment to make?

Let’s look at some of the factors involved with this virus., which is in fact classed as a sexually transmitted disease. Approximately 80% of sexually active women will have the virus at some stage of their lives and for 90% of them it will be harmless and will be cured by their own immune system without them ever knowing they had it. Any cases that go on to develop pre-cancerous cells, or even cancerous cells in approximately 180 cases, can be successfully treated. We are also reminded that early detection through screening increases the chances that cancerous cells will not develop and guarantees successful treatment

So there seem to be other factors at play here that bring into question the reasoning for vaccinating 30,000 12 year old girls every year. What we are not being told by the HSE is how many of the 73 annual deaths from cervical cancer are actually caused by this virus and how many are from other causes of cancer. This would seem vital to any investment in a vaccine programme. Neither are we being told how many of these deaths are due to late diagnosis due to the deficiencies in a national screening strategy.

From just these statistics alone the case for vaccinating everyone is seriously weakened. Then one must also consider that if we start vaccinating people against a virus that in 90% of the population the body’s immune system will deal with it, then what is this going to do to our body’s natural defenses in the long term. We should not be fixing something that isn’t broken or we will never develop a permanent herd immunity, something that a vaccine can never give us

If this wasn’t worrying enough, a piece of information that has been criminally overlooked is that the Gardasil vaccine will only offer protection for 5 years which means these 12 years old girls will have to go through it all again before most of them ever start having sex to be able to catch HPV. This is not the cure for cervical cancer the Dept of Health has been lauding it to be

However the most damning evidence is this quote from discussions at the FDA where it was admitted that HPV alone is insufficient to cause cancer. Dr. Elizabeth Unger of the Centers for Disease Control stated, “So it is believed that infection alone is insufficient to cause cancer, and additional factors are required for neoplasia”

Looking further into this vaccine we discover that it was fast tracked through approval procedures in 2006 in the US after testing on less than 1200 girls under 16. Many drugs have to go through a ten year process before gaining approval but this was somehow recommended for widespread use for girls as young as nine. This despite the trials throwing up a number of serious health complications and deaths in some of the test subjects which Merck and the Centre for Disease Control wrote off as “coincidence”. The issue that needs to be examined here is that the CDC itself is now barely independent as it is controlled by people who are either ex employees of or still contracted to the major pharmaceutical companies like Merck

A well documented example of this relationship that affected Ireland before was when another pharma company Bayer were stopped from selling a blood product called Factor 8 in the US by their regulators (FDA) because it was found to be tainted with HIV. However instead of destroying the products, and with the full knowledge of the FDA, the Factor 8 was shipped to Europe and other parts of the world and sold there. Europe had many deaths from this HIV tainted blood amongst it’s haemophilia sufferers who were mainly children when given this product, yet the US Government made no attempt to prosecute Bayer for the crime. This is why we are unable to trust these regulators when they continually refuse to recognise deaths and illnesses attributable to vaccines.

Indeed Merck themselves invented the polio vaccine back in the 1950s and discovered soon afterwards that it contained a simian cancer virus called SV40, however they continued to administer the vaccine to the world for over 30 years before it was fully removed. Unfortunately now that virus is passed down through generations which may go some way to explaining why 1 in 3 people suffer with cancer now.

This apparent corruption has not gone away as the EU Commission report by Dr Wodarg into the H1N1 pandemic concluded the pandemic and vaccine to be a pharmaceutical hoax yet the WHO still lists it as a pandemic today

Since Gardasil was recommended in the US 70 girls have died and 18,000 have suffered chronic health problems including paralysis, personality change, numbness, fatigue lupus, seizures, auto-immune problems, weakness, strokes, and the future inability to carry a pregnancy, yet Merck and the CDC still maintain it is “coincidental”.The VAERS group who collect this data also believe that the the actual reporting of adverse reactions they are receiving may be as little as 10% of the actual numbers as the reporting is purely voluntary.

More worrying still is that the pharma lobby is trying to make it mandatory and are pressuring school boards to mandate it for school entry. This raises concern here in Ireland because of the coming referendum on children’s rights. Hidden within this is a change to Article 42 (which makes the family superior to government). Once changed it will mean that if you do not vaccinate your child with Gardasil as directed by the state, they can deem you an unfit parent and have your child forcibly adopted and you will never see the child again. The additives alone in our general vaccines are of more concern than the viruses themselves when you consider they contain mercury, aluminium and formaldehyde amongst others yet more are being thrust upon us and this referendum will take away the right to refuse.

The way the pharmaceutical industry advertised the HPV vaccine in the media in the US was with snappy little ads with the slogan “One less” referring to cervical cancer sufferers. A more accurate slogan might have been “One more” referring to human damage caused by yet another untested and dangerous vaccine. In the US this year the FDA has now ceded that there is a case to answer for Gardasil and has taken presentations from the groups lobbying against it and is reviewing their evidence, so the question that must be asked is why Mary Harney is not being investigated for attempting to force this upon our children?



%d bloggers like this: