This is just an exercise in examinining how the mainstream press are untrustworthy and not to be believed. The story that came up Saturday was the story of the now almost 19 year old Robert Fletcher who, as is reported in the Daily Mail has just been awarded £90,000 from the Vaccines Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) in the UK. A pretty derisory amount considering his entire life has been taken away, leaving him with the mind of a 14 month old, unable to walk, extreme bouts of epilepsy, and prone to many other illnesses.
However, the most important part of this case is the ruling. That being that the cause of Robert’s life destroying disabilities and brain damage was the MMR 3 in 1 vaccine he received at ages 13 months. The panel of two doctors and one barrister at the appeal hearing ruled the MMR as the cause despite the attempts to use the “not proved beyond a doubt” or “coincidence” get out that is used by every pharmaceutical company for every incidence of death or injury from every vaccine
This case should be the key to the door, the leak in the floodgates that finally starts the tearing down of the veil of secrecy and lies perpetrated by the government and medical profession over the safety of vaccines for decades. It was the golden moment for the free press to shine and go for the jugular and start real debate. To ask all the relevent questions and pull out the real data on vaccine damage and the real situation regarding the corruption of the law surrounding claims of damage and the lack of data being collated by the authorities on exactly what is causing all the human waste Ah, but then the Daily Mail got hold of the story and this is what happened
Look at the way this so called journalist has reported this story. The case was a matter of public record so it couldn’t be ignored and had to be covered by the newspapers. So Martin Delgado has done so but has gone to pains to make sure it reads as nothing more than an irrelevant blip, despite the findings of the panel.
On half a dozen occasions in the article he stresses that there is no proven link between MMR and brain damage or autism; and on 4 separate occasions he take the opportunity to link in the completely unrelated story of Dr Robert Wakefield and slates him based on a corrupt ruling by a bought and paid for Medical Council decision. Repeat, repeat, repeat a lie until it becomes the truth, wasn’t that Stalin’s mantra? Well Martin seems to have been taught this method.
Then to round it off he finishes with the expected post script of the MMR being perfectly safe according to scientific studies, while never actually referring to any or the sources and their links to pharma and the elite foundations. So by the time the reader gets to the end of the article they have forgotten that it was about the MMR being ruled the cause of disablement and come away with the idea that MMR is safe and anyone who says otherwise should be struck off.
Do you see how this controlled corrupt press writing works now? They must report it so they spin it. This highlights to us most distinctly why we cannot trust anything we read in the mainstream press. For if we could then why would they not do a piece on the ruling that opened the up debate, asking a lot of questions that then forced the medical fraternity to enter the debate to defend their vaccines with real independent data instead of corrupt corporate data.
Well if you look into who owns the mainstream press and follow the money trail you will find your answer
The “article” from the Daily Mail
Family win 18 year fight over MMR damage to son: £90,000 payout is first since concerns over vaccine surfaced
By MARTIN DELGADO
Last updated at 11:35 PM on 28th August 2010
A mother whose son suffered severe brain damage after he was given the controversial MMR vaccine as a baby has been awarded £90,000 compensation.
The judgment is the first of its kind to be revealed since concerns were raised about the safety of the triple jab.
He endures frequent epileptic fits and requires round-the-clock care from his parents Jackie and John, though he is not autistic.
He suffered the devastating effects after being given the combined measles, mumps and rubella vaccine when he was 13 months old.
The Department of Health had always denied that the jab was the cause of Robert’s disability.
But now, in a judgment which will give hope to hundreds of other parents whose children have been severely affected by routine vaccinations, a medical assessment panel consisting of two doctors and a barrister has concluded that MMR was to blame.
Robert’s mother Jackie said the money would help with his care, though she described the amount as ‘derisory’.
Her first application for compensation under the Government’s Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme was rejected in 1997 on the grounds that it was impossible to prove beyond reasonable doubt what had caused Robert’s illness.
But Mrs Fletcher appealed and in a ruling delivered last week, a new panel of experts came to a different conclusion.
Healthy: Robert in the bath as baby before he had the MMR jab
In a six-page judgment, they said: ‘Robert was a more or less fit boy who, within the period usually considered relevant to immunisation, developed a severe convulsion… and he then went on to be epileptic and severely retarded.
‘The seizure occurred ten days after the vaccination. In our view, this cannot be put down to coincidence.
‘It is this temporal association that provides the link. It is this that has shown on the balance of probabilities that the vaccination triggered the epilepsy.
‘On this basis, we find that Robert is severely disabled as a result of vaccination and this is why we allowed the appeal.’
The ruling will reignite the debate over the safety of common childhood vaccines, although it makes clear that Robert’s case does not involve autism.
There is one other reported case of a family being given compensation as a result of an MMR jab.
But Mrs Fletcher said she believed the compensation award to Robert was the first to a surviving MMR-damaged person since controversy erupted in 1998 when the now discredited Dr Andrew Wakefield raised concerns about a possible link between the combined MMR injection and autism. He has since been struck off the medical register.
The Government refuses to say how many awards have been directly attributed to this jab rather than other inoculations against illnesses such as diphtheria or whooping cough.
Details of successful claims involving vaccine-damaged children are seldom publicised because the Department of Health is thought to be anxious not to encourage a rush of applications.
Figures released in 2005 under the Freedom of Information Act revealed that tribunals had paid out £3.5 million over the previous eight years.
The Department for Work and Pensions, which administers the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme, said: ‘We do not hold any information on how many awards have been MMR-related.
‘It is not a requirement when a case is being assessed for the medical adviser to state which vaccine the damage has been attributed to.
‘Nor is it a requirement to list the disabling condition that gave rise to the award.’
The controversy over a suggested link between MMR and autism erupted in 1998 when Dr Wakefield published a paper in The Lancet medical journal.
His work has since been discredited and earlier this year Dr Wakefield, who has moved to America, was struck off the medical register after the General Medical Council ruled that he had acted against the interests of patients and ‘failed in his duties as a responsible consultant’.
Campaign: Robert’s mother Jackie set up JABS – a pressure group which provides advice and support to families affected by vaccinations
Robert Fletcher does not suffer from autism. But Mrs Fletcher, from Warrington, Cheshire, said the ruling would give hope to hundreds of other parents fighting to prove that their children’s disabilities were caused by the MMR injection.
Mrs Fletcher set up and runs pressure group JABS – Justice, Awareness and Basic
Support. Around 2,000 families seeking compensation for their vaccine-damaged children are registered with the group, which provides advice and support.
‘My husband John and I have battled for 18 years for the cause of Robert’s disability to be officially recognised,’ she said. ‘We were told the vaccine was perfectly safe. Like most people, we trusted what the doctors and nurses were putting to us.
‘Robert is nearly 19 but mentally he is like a 14-month-old toddler. He can’t stand unaided and he is doubly incontinent. ‘He can’t speak except to say “Hi, Mum” or “Hi, Daddy”.
‘We chop up his food and have to anticipate all his needs. He is prone to various illnesses and last week suffered around 40 severe epileptic seizures.
‘In April this year, we thought we’d lost him. He contracted a chest infection and had to go to hospital for several days.
‘He is such a lovely boy. When he’s not ill, he’s so cheerful and seems to take everything on the chin. In between seizures he says “Hi, Mum” and tries to kiss me.
‘The money is a derisory amount though it will help with making adaptations to the house for Robert’s benefit.
‘What matters is the recognition that MMR was the reason this happened.’
The first doctor who assessed Robert under the compensation scheme in 1996 concluded that he had suffered a ‘simple febrile convulsion with no long-lasting consequences’. Although he agreed that Robert had a degree of disability, he refused to accept that the MMR vaccine was to blame.
At this month’s appeal, evidence was given by a leading expert on vaccine-damaged children, paediatric neurologist Dr Marcel Kinsbourne. He explained the biological changes which had occurred in Robert’s brain following the vaccination.
The one-day hearing was chaired by a barrister sitting with two doctors, Professor Sundara Lingam, a former consultant at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, and Dr Adrian Allaway.
In a dissenting judgment, Professor Lingam said he believed Robert was ‘genetically predisposed to epilepsy and that the vaccination triggered it rather than caused it.
‘Robert would have developed epilepsy in any event, even if he had not had the vaccination’.
But Professor Lingam was overruled by his two colleagues.
In their final judgment, they accepted that MMR had caused Robert’s illness but added: ‘We would stress that this decision is fact-specific and it should not be seen as a precedent for any other case.
‘In particular, it has no relevance to the issue… as to whether there is a link between the MMR vaccine and autism.’
Last night, Tory MP Nadine Dorries, a member of the powerful Commons Health Committee, said: ‘If an independent panel has reached the conclusion that there has been a link between the MMR vaccine and the brain damage suffered by this boy in this case, then it is fair to assume that there could be as many as thousands of children and parents in the same position.
‘There should be full and easy access to all documentation relating to the judgment for any parent or professional to read and assess.’
Dr Michael Fitzpatrick, a London GP whose own son is autistic, said: ‘It is a very important principle that parents should be compensated in cases of this kind. ‘But although a causal link has been established in law in this instance, exhaustive scientific research has failed to establish any link between MMR and brain damage.
‘This case should not make parents feel any different about the safety of the vaccine.’
The Department of Health said: ‘This decision reflects the opinion of a tribunal on the specific facts of the case and they were clear that it should not be seen as a precedent for any other case.
‘The safety of MMR has been endorsed through numerous studies in many countries.’